Re: [GNC] Pack with Python bindings on macOS?

2023-04-22 Thread john
I guess about an hour per release, but most of that time would be the computer working, not me. The main effort would be in figuring out how to set things up so that the two builds wouldn't get mixed up. Regards, John Ralls > On Apr 22, 2023, at 1:44 AM, Geert Janssens > wrote: > > Out of

Re: [GNC] Pack with Python bindings on macOS?

2023-04-22 Thread monson
Thanks John. Then I'm thinking to pack a no-gui gnucash (a.k.a. python bindings and libgnucash) on conda-forge. This could drop massive dependencies and work on multi platforms. I have successfully build one, but it fails to import due to macOS's rpath mechanism and I'm not quit familiar with it.

Re: [GNC] Pack with Python bindings on macOS?

2023-04-22 Thread Geert Janssens
Out of curiosity, would it be much more work to create two release bundles ? One with and one without python bindings ? I recall Libreoffice has done that for quite a while to optionally bundle a java runtime. Though they seem to have stopped doing that. Regards, Geert Op vrijdag 21 april

[GNC] Pack with Python bindings on macOS?

2023-04-21 Thread monson
Hi there, The pure python client `piecash` seems obsoleted and no longer worked with latest sqlalchemy and gnucash, so I'm trying to switch to original python bindings. Since they aren't shipped in the pre-built bundle, I tried to build those bindings but it seems have to build the whole gnucash

Re: [GNC] Pack with Python bindings on macOS?

2023-04-21 Thread john
> On Apr 21, 2023, at 3:17 AM, monson wrote: > > Hi there, > > The pure python client `piecash` seems obsoleted and no longer worked with > latest sqlalchemy and gnucash, so I'm trying to switch to original python > bindings. Since they aren't shipped in the pre-built bundle, I tried to