Op donderdag 15 augustus 2019 06:52:45 CEST schreef David T.:
> Geert,
>
> I was beginning to understand this point as well. Not that it makes
> sense in any way. Why would a user choose to define an image along with
> its accompanying text box by pixel?
I appreciate your user perspective on
Geert,
I was beginning to understand this point as well. Not that it makes
sense in any way. Why would a user choose to define an image along with
its accompanying text box by pixel? Further: the setting is "Plot width"
--and not "Width of pie and accompanying text box" or something equally
Your screenshot doesn't show this, but did you report also display a legend ?
I believe the legend and chart together are fitted into the dimensions you
set. If the text in the legend varies from report to report, that my explain
why the charts themselves vary as well.
Geert
Op dinsdag 13
I'm pretty sure that this code isn't making sizing decisions based on
readability-- at least not in my experience. It is perfectly happy to cram
huge amounts of data into tiny on screen areas... Percentages default to 100%,
but remember previously stored values.
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at
I could see how more actual slices (regardless of how many accounts were
chosen) would maybe trigger a larger size than a really small one specified for
readability. But still, that should be only a default behavior and should not
override a specified size.
I think yes, the percentage is based
I could understand why a chart with more slices might default to a larger size,
but it appears the bottom two charts both have 3 slices, yet are different
sizes.
However, since they are set to all be the same size, they should all be the
same size.
What happens if you use the percentage
Dang. New mail client ate my screen shot! Next try...
On 8/12/2019 9:07 PM, David T. via gnucash-user wrote:
Hello,
The attached screen shot shows three iterations of a standard
Piechart. Each has its own set of accounts and slices, but each is set
to plot its chart to the same 485 by 240
Hello,
The attached screen shot shows three iterations of a standard Piechart.
Each has its own set of accounts and slices, but each is set to plot its
chart to the same 485 by 240 dimensions--and yet, each one is clearly a
different size! While the first is an Expense piechart, I believe
