Re: [GNC] Mutual fund cost basis changes between 2.6.6 and 2.6.19

John, Thanks for fixing the issue on average cost basis in release 3.3. I can now confirm that 3.3 reports balance sheet numbers correctly and my imbalance only shows 0.20 over 18 years of data (instead of 100’s of thousands before). With this fix and the CSV price importer feature, I have

Re: Mutual fund cost basis changes between 2.6.6 and 2.6.19

Noted. As suggested, I have kept both 2.6.11 and 2.6.19 for now. Hopefully, when 3.0 is released, I can run a single version to maintain the correct cost basis. Cheers. On 13-Jan-2018, at 8:31 PM, John Ralls > wrote: On Jan 12, 2018, at 9:43 PM,

Re: Mutual fund cost basis changes between 2.6.6 and 2.6.19

> On Jan 12, 2018, at 9:43 PM, Deva - wrote: > > Thanks John. > > I haven’t filed a bug/enhancement before - GnuCash has been wonderful as it > is! I will look into how to do this and add the use case as you suggested. > > In the meantime, should I downgrade to 2.6.11

Re: Mutual fund cost basis changes between 2.6.6 and 2.6.19

Thanks John. I haven’t filed a bug/enhancement before - GnuCash has been wonderful as it is! I will look into how to do this and add the use case as you suggested. In the meantime, should I downgrade to 2.6.11 (last version where cost basis is correctly reported)? The reason I upgraded was

Re: Mutual fund cost basis changes between 2.6.6 and 2.6.19

> On Jan 12, 2018, at 3:43 AM, Deva - wrote: > > Hello, > > I am on Mac OS Sierra v10.12.6. > > Until a few days ago, I was using GnuCash 2.6.6 and just in the last 2 days, > I upgraded to the latest version 2.6.19. > > After running a preliminary test of some of the