Re: [GNC] Rethinking the placeholder account concept (was: Re: Fwd: The two modules)

Am 02.07.2018 um 03:05 schrieb Christopher Lam: > Discussions are useful; but would anyone have an idealised template, or > sample output that the balance sheet should produce? Idealy with the > 'account-has-children-and-amounts' peculiarity? > The balsheet in development will, ideally, replace

Re: [GNC] Rethinking the placeholder account concept (was: Re: Fwd: The two modules)

On 07/01/2018 06:05 PM, Christopher Lam wrote: > Discussions are useful; but would anyone have an idealised template, or > sample output that the balance sheet should produce? Idealy with the > 'account-has-children-and-amounts' peculiarity? > The balsheet in development will, ideally, replace the

Re: [GNC] Rethinking the placeholder account concept (was: Re: Fwd: The two modules)

Discussions are useful; but would anyone have an idealised template, or sample output that the balance sheet should produce? Idealy with the 'account-has-children-and-amounts' peculiarity? The balsheet in development will, ideally, replace the current (non-eguile) one. The existing one has amounts

Re: [GNC] Rethinking the placeholder account concept (was: Re: Fwd: The two modules)

Am 01.07.2018 um 01:57 schrieb DaveC49: > Stephen John, Geert > > In accounting terms there are really only 3 basic account types: > Asset > Liability > Equity > > These all *must *satisfy the basic accounting equation Assets=Liabilities > +Equity. > > The two sides of this equation

Re: [GNC] Rethinking the placeholder account concept (was: Re: Fwd: The two modules)

Am Samstag, 30. Juni 2018, 05:37:28 CEST schrieb John Ralls: > > On Jun 29, 2018, at 3:26 PM, Christian Kluge > > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Am 29.06.2018 um 19:26 schrieb John Ralls: > >>> On Jun 29, 2018, at 9:52 AM, Geert Janssens > >>> wrote:>>> > >>> Op vrijdag 29 juni 2018 16:59:07 CEST

Re: [GNC] Rethinking the placeholder account concept (was: Re: Fwd: The two modules)

Stephen John, Geert In accounting terms there are really only 3 basic account types: Asset Liability Equity These all *must *satisfy the basic accounting equation Assets=Liabilities +Equity. The two sides of this equation are what the German /European system defines as Activa and

Re: [GNC] Rethinking the placeholder account concept (was: Re: Fwd: The two modules)

Am 30.06.2018 um 22:52 schrieb John Ralls: > > >> On Jun 30, 2018, at 12:00 PM, Christian Kluge wrote: >> >> Am 30.06.2018 um 05:37 schrieb John Ralls: >>> >>> On Jun 29, 2018, at 3:26 PM, Christian Kluge wrote: Hi, Am 29.06.2018 um 19:26 schrieb John Ralls:

Re: [GNC] Rethinking the placeholder account concept (was: Re: Fwd: The two modules)

> On Jun 30, 2018, at 12:00 PM, Christian Kluge wrote: > > Am 30.06.2018 um 05:37 schrieb John Ralls: >> >> >>> On Jun 29, 2018, at 3:26 PM, Christian Kluge wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Am 29.06.2018 um 19:26 schrieb John Ralls: > On Jun 29, 2018, at 9:52 AM, Geert Janssens

Re: [GNC] Rethinking the placeholder account concept (was: Re: Fwd: The two modules)

Am 30.06.2018 um 05:37 schrieb John Ralls: > > >> On Jun 29, 2018, at 3:26 PM, Christian Kluge wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Am 29.06.2018 um 19:26 schrieb John Ralls: >>> >>> On Jun 29, 2018, at 9:52 AM, Geert Janssens wrote: Op vrijdag 29 juni 2018 16:59:07 CEST schreef John

Re: [GNC] Rethinking the placeholder account concept (was: Re: Fwd: The two modules)

> On Jun 29, 2018, at 3:26 PM, Christian Kluge wrote: > > Hi, > > Am 29.06.2018 um 19:26 schrieb John Ralls: >> >> >>> On Jun 29, 2018, at 9:52 AM, Geert Janssens >>> wrote: >>> >>> Op vrijdag 29 juni 2018 16:59:07 CEST schreef John Ralls: Stock accounts need to have a parent

Re: [GNC] Rethinking the placeholder account concept (was: Re: Fwd: The two modules)

Hi, Am 29.06.2018 um 19:26 schrieb John Ralls: > > >> On Jun 29, 2018, at 9:52 AM, Geert Janssens >> wrote: >> >> Op vrijdag 29 juni 2018 16:59:07 CEST schreef John Ralls: >>> Stock accounts need to have a parent denominated the currency in which the >>> stock trades in order for the asset

Re: [GNC] Rethinking the placeholder account concept (was: Re: Fwd: The two modules)

Op vrijdag 29 juni 2018 16:59:07 CEST schreef John Ralls: > Stock accounts need to have a parent denominated the currency in which the > stock trades in order for the asset roll-up to work correctly on the > Accounts page. Three-commodity transactions are possible using trading > accounts, but I

Re: [GNC] Rethinking the placeholder account concept (was: Re: Fwd: The two modules)

On 06/29/2018 09:52 AM, Geert Janssens wrote: > Op vrijdag 29 juni 2018 16:59:07 CEST schreef John Ralls: >> Stock accounts need to have a parent denominated the currency in which the >> stock trades in order for the asset roll-up to work correctly on the >> Accounts page. Three-commodity

Re: [GNC] Rethinking the placeholder account concept (was: Re: Fwd: The two modules)

> On Jun 29, 2018, at 9:52 AM, Geert Janssens > wrote: > > Op vrijdag 29 juni 2018 16:59:07 CEST schreef John Ralls: >> Stock accounts need to have a parent denominated the currency in which the >> stock trades in order for the asset roll-up to work correctly on the >> Accounts page.

Re: [GNC] Rethinking the placeholder account concept (was: Re: Fwd: The two modules)

> On Jun 29, 2018, at 2:24 AM, Geert Janssens > wrote: > > Op donderdag 28 juni 2018 19:27:47 CEST schreef John Ralls: >>> On Jun 28, 2018, at 10:10 AM, Geert Janssens >>> wrote:> >>> Op donderdag 28 juni 2018 18:47:18 CEST schreef Stephen M. Butler: On 06/27/2018 04:41 PM, DaveC49

[GNC] Rethinking the placeholder account concept (was: Re: Fwd: The two modules)

Op donderdag 28 juni 2018 19:27:47 CEST schreef John Ralls: > > On Jun 28, 2018, at 10:10 AM, Geert Janssens > > wrote:> > > Op donderdag 28 juni 2018 18:47:18 CEST schreef Stephen M. Butler: > >> On 06/27/2018 04:41 PM, DaveC49 wrote: > >>> An active non-placeholder account should not have