On 5/30/2017 8:54 AM, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) wrote:
On 30 May 2017 at 12:26, Mike or Penny Novack
> wrote:
I was not referring to meetings among the people
designing/writing/testing the new software. I
On 30 May 2017 at 12:26, Mike or Penny Novack <
stepbystepf...@dialup4less.com> wrote:
> On 5/29/2017 10:45 PM, Bruce Danielson wrote:
>
>> I agree Dave, and getting that done in 100 hours I think is optimistic.
>> Realistically I think it is probably well beyond the scope of “free”
>> software.
May 29, 2017 2:44 PM
To: Bruce Danielson Cc: Adrien Monteleone; GNU Cash User Subject: Re:
Issues with Jobs and Purchase Orders. On 29 May 2017 at 16:53, Bruce
Danielson <daniels...@logroom.com> wrote: I see that clearly Dave as an
excellent addition – and quotations are related to purchas
On 29 May 2017 at 16:53, Bruce Danielson wrote:
> I see that clearly Dave as an excellent addition – and quotations are
> related to purchase orders as invoices are to bills and customers to
> vendors.
>
>
>
> Thanks for that bit of insight.
>
>
>
> Bruce
>
I doubt
appreciate it.
> Bruce
>
> -Original Message-
> From: gnucash-user
> [mailto:gnucash-user-bounces+danielsonb=logroom@gnucash.org] On Behalf Of
> Adrien Monteleone
> Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2017 6:21 PM
> To: gnucash-user@gnucash.org
> Subject: Re: Issues with Jobs a
Bruce,
If you are in a situation where vendors honor POs as issued and fill them in
full or not at all, you could probably get away with creating a bill and not
posting it and using that as the PO until the order is filled and then posting.
However, there’s the intermediate step of shipping
Thank you Adrien, all that is pretty much what I figured. Sorry about the
misleading subject, left over from a previous question.
In the construction contracting world, a vendor invoice better match the PO to
the penny, or there's the devil to pay. The PO is an implied contract, and