On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 06:25:45PM +0200, Valentin Gagarin wrote:
> curl -L https://nixos.org/nix/install | sh -s -- --daemon
Blind execution of something potentially corrupted coming
from the Internet, and by use of a pipe you don't even have
a way to retroactively find out if your system
> On 3/16/24 17:08, carlo von lynX wrote:
> > No, there are machines that *need* to be online, but there are
> > always human beings that *like* to have machines always online
> > even if they don't need it for GNUnet.
On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 07:54:56PM +0200, MSavoritias
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 04:19:21PM +0200, MSavoritias wrote:
> By servers I mean a separate machine that is used to run services non
> graphically that usually needs to be always online.
No, there are machines that *need* to be online, but there are
always human beings that *like* to have
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 02:32:51PM +0200, MSavoritias wrote:
> - XMPP uses the XEP 0313 which is basically a protocol to retrieve messages.
> Where these messages stored is left as an exercise to the reader although
> most people use servers including secushare it seems which made my interest
> in
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 01:26:18PM +0530, Sahil wrote:
> Sorry for the delayed response. I was trying to wrap my head around
> this.
That's the most noble thing to say and all the reason why
asynchronous messaging was invented in the first place. :)
> Thank you for your reply. I am able to
Hi Sahil,
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 02:37:36AM +0530, Sahil wrote:
> This looks very interesting. "Multicast distribution trees" is a new topic for
> me. I'll read up on this too.
It's the way how cloud technologies achieve scalability, and it is
the biggest failure of the free world that it let
Moin Martin,
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 06:26:09AM +, Martin Schanzenbach wrote:
> - Hiding in "common" Internet traffic: e.g. if two peers communicate
> via HTTPS (and assuming we can obfuscate the traffic patterns of the
> applications in GNUnet), they look like browser/web server to an
>
On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 10:30:07AM +0200, em...@msavoritias.me wrote:
> XMPP can work fine through p2p. Its just not being done a lot because of
> other reasons i can expand if needed.
Yes, you can rewrite any protocol radically enough to cook rice
or iron your shirts but then you are really just
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 02:15:02PM +, Schanzenbach, Martin wrote:
> This release marks a noteworthy milestone in that it includes a
> completely new transport layer.
Congrats!!!
> - There are known major design issues in the CORE subsystems which
> will need to be addressed in the future
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 12:49:07PM +0530, valdaarhun wrote:
> Or how's the idea of writing a new communicator plugin for
> TNG? For eg., a plugin for XMPP [4]? I am not sure if this needed
> in GNUnet. I thought I would put my idea out there to get some
> feedback.
I tried to pretend not having
Thank you, madmurphy! I think several of the gnunet
CLI tools need improvements of this kind, actually.
I vaguely remember doing similar edits somewhere -
making outputs friendly to parse.
On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 08:09:02AM +, madmurphy wrote:
>1. What do you think about the fact that I
Hello Loki!
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 11:55:02AM +0200, Loki Schmidt (They/Them) wrote:
> https://git.gnunet.org/bibliography.git/plain/docs/gnunet-psyc.pdf
>
> I have always been curious about the multicast implementation of
> PSYC, does it run on top of CADET or is it a parallel service or is
>
On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 09:03:36AM +0100, Tobias Platen wrote:
> I had a quick look at the gnunet psycstore, which is part of the
> musticast implementation. ASSIGN is already implemented,
Thank you for taking a look. Oh yes, I find it should really
be called musticast rather than multicast.. ;)
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 07:49:48PM +0100, Jeff Burdges wrote:
> I’ve forgotten what PSYC does.. I vaguely recall key values pairs ala HTML..
> I’ve no real idea why a key-value abstraction helps in messaging.
Check out t3sserakt's talk explaining modeling
the many facets of visibility of
Heya Jeff, happy new year...
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 03:52:41PM +0100, Jeff Burdges wrote:
> Moxie loves talking about platforms vs protocols, but really only legacy
> cruft like Bitcoin and Ethereum adopted this non-upgradeable protocol
> bullshit fairy tails, and even Ethereum wants to
As much as I notoriously doubt that the end-to-end
encryption Whatsapp actually stops agencies from
having any insight, I appreciate Moxie's recent dive
into the world of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs):
https://moxie.org/2022/01/07/web3-first-impressions.html
I heard similar doubts from CCC people
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 11:05:06AM +0200, carlo von lynX wrote:
> The circular topology of end points *does* satisfy the secushare
> expectations on privacy and metadata privacy in particular AFAICT,
> so that's very cool.
Whoopsa I'm posting faster than I am thinking, sorry. No, without
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 10:29:02AM +0200, TheJackiMonster wrote:
> Because the messenger service was mentioned I thought I could try to
> clarify. I'm unsure if it's the proper back-end for secushare but
> technically speaking you can just think of it as layer on top of CADET
> to form groups
Tobias, so happy to hear that your hands-on on the matter! Everything
t3sserakt warns about is unfortunately true - after all the effort put
into those subsystems we don't know if they have a chance of delivering
what we need at any happy point in the future. Some additional thoughts
on what
On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 02:06:21PM +0200, Tobias Platen wrote:
> I'm interested in contibuting to gnunet-secushare, so I tried joining the
> chat on psyced.org. But that one does not work.
>
> Secure Connection Failed
>
> An error occurred during a connection to psyced.org:3. SSL received a
On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 12:38:56PM +0100, Lukas Schmidt wrote:
> >>> Sure, you could argue that most centralized services probably just
> >>> visualize an option of deletion or modification while keeping the
> >>> old
> >>> state stored anyway. But I would like to actually provide this
> >>>
On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 12:23:31PM +0100, TheJackiMonster wrote:
> Waiting for the completion of a message is far worse for most users
> than looking at dynamic previews or states from my experience. Because
> you can't expect the people to be physically separated while
> sending/receiving a
Good morning!
> > Super inefficient for small pieces of data I would assume,
> > and introducing so much latency that in the end it feels
> > slower than using the web. When simple things arrive in-band
> > you can display them immediately. I'd rather use FS for
> > things >1M.
On Sat, Mar 06,
On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 06:55:21PM +0100, TheJackiMonster wrote:
> Files will most likely be shared through the FS submodule of GNUnet.
> They get encrypted and the key for decryption gets shared through the
> messenger service. That's quite similar to the implementation of
> Threema except this
On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 04:09:17PM +0100, TheJackiMonster wrote:
> I'm not currently sure if we should use JSON (which is more common in
> current web) or use PSYC (which would be more efficient). The service
> itself should allow both, so this would probably be something to decide
> on
That sounds pretty awesome!!! Does it also work in the wild
or only within testbed simulations? Does it have any sorts
of server component or does it manage to distribute state
in the gnunet?
The feature list sounds a lot like things that were supposed
to go into secushare but we didn't get there
Sorry if as usual I sounded more harsh/bitter than I actually am.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 10:54:49AM +0900, Martin Schanzenbach wrote:
> We do have a "hidden" roadmap (not 100% up to date anymore):
> https://gnunet.org/en/roadmap.html
We have one as well… similarly hidden:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:36:21PM +0100, Christian Grothoff wrote:
> gtk+: I'm still undecided ;-).
Since most of GNUnet apps have nothing to do with file sharing,
all of file sharing would deserve its own repo. That implies
a split of gnunet-gtk.
> > - Is "messenger" a part of "secushare"?
>
On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 10:28:02PM +0900, Schanzenbach, Martin wrote:
> That sounds like it allows anyone to highjack any (established) channel
> after a successful kx.
Oh, transport does not guarantee the identity of nodes so CADET
has to handle authentication itself... great. Still, an attacker
Why Anna? Because Alice sounds too much like it's about crypto!
Greetings from the secushare workshop. We're discussing the
implications of the protocol design bug regarding that Alice
(Anna) or Betty logic by which if the channel breaks and
Betty wants to re-open it, then she can't actually do
On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 12:20:34PM +0100, Schanzenbach, Martin wrote:
> We are delighted to announce that ICANN has invited the GNUnet project to
> speak at the next ICANN Annual General Meeting [1]. We have been invited to
> join a panel discussion on Emerging Internet Identifier Technologies
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 12:44:26AM +0200, rexxnor wrote:
> Due to popular demand from the people at camp I submitted a self
> organized session for the camp.
That's heartwarming to see. <3
Saturday I have to be downtown
pretty much immediately after the
time of that session.
Unlikely I'll make
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 03:23:48PM +, Olie Ayre wrote:
> Thanks for taking time to answer my questions! "Late" or otherwise, they're
> still helpful :)
GReat!
> The "pub-sub" approach makes a lot of sense. I think you explaining that sort
> of helped it
> click. So if I'm understanding
One month late, but what do you expect from a guy gone arty.
> > ### 1: How might I "serve" files?
Should secushare step out of its unvoluntary condition of
vaporware, then there would be a pub-sub API which actively
pushes content to all subscribers (unlike the humbug they've
put into IPFS in
On Sat, Nov 03, 2018 at 10:06:36PM +0100, Christian Grothoff wrote:
> TLDR: one could do this, but would likely be bad for performance and to
> achieve strong privacy we need it on another layer.
Excellent and convincing argumentation as always.
Thank you.
You may find this off-topic but I find it
motivating to not give up the fight.
___
GNUnet-developers mailing list
GNUnet-developers@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
Received this message from a supporter:
hey, I lack the time to chase this and I figure you have the right
contacts to chase this, googling gnunet from the UK (you can try via
google.co.uk) yields uk.gnunet.org as the first result.
which wouldn't seem so bad, but combined with
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 07:55:26PM +0200, Phil Buschmann wrote:
> the last mails on this mailing list discussed design of the logo and the
> website but I was thinking of another important design question:
> As it is kind of my work to design a website for the rest API of GNUnet
> (GSoC), I want
Thanks for the kind words or rather.. I'm glad
you're agreeing with us on most of this!
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 09:20:58AM +0200, hyazin...@emailn.de wrote:
> I'm wondering a bit about the text not being 'GNUnet', but 'gnu:net'. Wasn't
> consensus in case of text application, that it should be
Ladies and gentlemen,
from the heights of the swiss mountains comes
a sense of decentralised consensus regarding
the beauty of things.
I picked one of amirouche's most promosing
designs (thanks for the svg!), changed the
horns and head to look a bit more like a
gnu and less like a 'V', changed
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 04:45:06PM +0200, Christian Grothoff wrote:
> I think this is the time where I have to disclose a major unfortunate
> development (but which may be resolved soon without too much drama).
So how did it end?
> Thus, I think that choosing a logo that may remotely resemble a
I think I remember that either the answer is no, or that
the way GNUnet uses its DHT ensures that it is not a problem.
I am asking to know whether it is an aspect we need to keep
an eye on when designing new DHT apps, given the terrible
experiences seen with the Tor, Retroshare and Bittorrent
Just when I wanted to remind the user of the
surveillance IRC that they can get anonymous
git notifications if they log into psyced.org
and issue '+subscribe git' from within #gnunet.
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 12:59:34PM +, n...@crash.cx wrote:
> > remote: WARNING: repo-specific-hooks:
> >
Martin, excellent: a CADET logo! :D
This guix-derived logo is amazing. For the print version
it's enough to remove the backlight effect, so no big deal.
So from my understanding of logo design this thing is compliant.
Krumelmonster's are also very neat, but I perceive
the gnu as too prominent -
Martin, we are the minority of people who accepted
the gnu on the web... maybe we want to extend our
audience to the people that think that such a home-
grown logo doesn't stand for professionality? Same
goes for the terrible Taler logo? Let Amirouche'
creativity go wild, it is going in a totally
This time there aren't dozens of things keeping me from
answering in due time! :) Sorry for the delay regarding
pubsub.
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 01:07:08AM +0100, amirouche wrote:
> I got into creating a new logo for gnunet
> logos and mockup at https://imgur.com/a/ZOjNU
Fabulous. I didn't dare
Welcome to the little GNUnet world!
I've seen fine and appetizing commits regarding gnunet-guile.
Thank you!
In former times, Amirouche Boubekki wrote:
> There is also a real-time or near realtime aspect that I would
> like to tackle. I could come up with the naming scheme that will
> allow to
Mary Xmas!
https://events.ccc.de/congress/2017/wiki/index.php/Assembly:NGI
now boasts with several sessions. Bernd has made
some large ones on 29th while we made some on 27th
because not everyone is available on the 29th.
Please feel invited to give us your input and
latest news on the 29th (by
On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 12:08:23PM +0100, Christian Grothoff wrote:
> "NOTE: Creating Self organized Sessions isn't possible right now. Please
> try it later. :)"
The situation was similar at the 30c3. I had already
collected something like 10 talks in a wiki table
on the assembly page before I
Pardon the lack of democracy but the strategy department has chosen
that this year we squat the European Commission's hackerspace...
Therefore, this year's YBTI/WeMakeUsAGNUOne is called ...
https://events.ccc.de/congress/2017/wiki/index.php/Assembly:NGI
Please edit and sabotage to your liking.
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 05:42:45PM +0200, Christian Grothoff wrote:
> 2) Yes, running in the 'global' network with outdated peers is likely to
> cause all kinds of fun problems, as the DHT may or may not work, or in
> the worst case the DHT discovers a path which then does not work on the
> CADET
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 05:26:39PM +0200, t3sserakt wrote:
> 1. On which days you will be at the CCC congress (please mark with x):
>
> - 27th
> - 28th
> - 29th
> - 30th
all
> 2. Would you be interested on participating a GNUnet all hands meeting
> for some days. Let us know how many days you
Thanksalot. Your git fork has been merged!
Thanks also for figuring out that silly crasher in gnunet-social.
See you in the chat... :)
--
E-mail is public! Talk to me in private using encryption:
http://loupsycedyglgamf.onion/LynX/
irc://loupsycedyglgamf.onion:67/lynX
Just in case you have heard of a swiss iniative to replace
BGP called SCION, https://www.scion-architecture.net - it,
too, is presented like a replacement for the current
Internet. I found this passage in the FAQ interesting:
> Is SCION a source-routed architecture?
>
> Source routing does not
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 08:10:41PM +0200, Jeff Burdges wrote:
> I donno if that article should be taken too seriously, but it suggest
Certainly not. Just because one journalist doesn't miss
any of his friends when going social, that doesn't mean
everyone is anti-social as he is.
> the many major
It is up to us to decide whether we want GNUnet to be easily
abusable like Android, or offer at least Affero style protection
to its users. I raised the worry and Christian first asked RMS
for an opinion before we'd bring it here. After some debate, RMS
concluded that he'll leave it to us to
The domains do indeed look somewhat neat, but I'm not
sceptic regarding first-come-first-served systems that
soon become useless if all cool words and brands are
squatted.. I think a heuristic what the majority of the
social network thinks that "CNN" is would be more
accurate in leading people to
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 12:39:37AM +0100, Jeff Burdges wrote:
> I'm in Berlin for NYE, so I'm available the 1st and 2nd, but I leave
> early on 3 January.
Sorry for late reply.. I wasn't getting feedback from my
university contact.. looks like the room assignment office
is closed until January,
I received the offer from Humboldt University
to host an YBTI/WeFix... type of event at their
facilities just after new year's eve. How many
of you hackers are planning to spend NYE in
Berlin and would like to meet people interested
in what we are doing?
We can do talks, workshops, hack
Hello eternal traveller!
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 10:59:53AM +0100, hellekin wrote:
> On 12/01/2016 07:27 PM, carlo von lynX wrote:
> >
> > http://secushare.cheettyiapsyciew.onion/broken-internet
>
> Nice. Why is faceboogle yellow? Is that to say it's compatible or
>
Picking up an old thread since there has been some misunderstanding
of what was said here:
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 03:50:19PM +0200, Christian Grothoff wrote:
> On 05/05/2016 02:29 PM, Daniel Golle wrote:
> > Hi everyone!
> >
> > I got a bunch of questions about the subsystems mentioned above:
>
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 03:28:19PM +0100, Drasko DRASKOVIC wrote:
> For decentralization - this is worh loking:
> https://safenetforum.org/t/maidsafe-and-gnunet-comparison/2779.
Huh.. there is no description of gnunet on that page at all.
dirvine explains some things of maidsafe that sound like
news: secushare participated at fiffkon with a nice booth:
http://secushare.cheettyiapsyciew.onion/img/fiffkon2016.jpeg
and we discussed with visitors a lot about the broken and
the gnu internet, driven by the illustration that puts the
two in comparison:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 01:30:37PM +0100, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> This sounds interesting.
Yes, Daniel.. keep up that good work you are doing!
> 3. What would be the difference to for example IoTvity, openHAB and
> other existing solutions?
Haven't seen an answer from Daniel and maybe you find
On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 06:29:40PM +0100, Martin Schanzenbach wrote:
> Okay got. But then you don't need GNS. As in: at all.
There is certainly a lot of conceptual duplication, but then
again there are constellations where GNS makes more sense
than distributed pubsubs. We found in one particular
> Definitively not. Neither the psycstore nor the existing
> namestore/namecache have the operation needed for what Martin is
> thinking about on the blog. However, the operation *you* are thinking
> about would be local.
Yes, doing it locally is the proper way to do it and
requiring people to
This summer I reported https://gnunet.org/bugs/view.php?id=4625
> For many kinds of applications we need to authenticate incoming connections
> as coming from a certain person or at least from a certain peer. The exit
> daemon is currently not providing a way to find out who is calling.
systems
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/45.1.1
Le 01/07/2016 à 14:02, carlo von lynX a écrit :
> Just thought.. strange.. Aymeric never bails out of a discussion,
> and guess what, I overlooked his reply! Here we go.
Maybe we can con
Thanks Martin for the in-depth reply.
Thanks Andrew for the good news that dbus does not do XML all the time. ;)
I would like to suggest one more GSoC job to submit:
Fix the following bugs so we can release GNUnet:
https://gnunet.org/bugs/view.php?id=3994
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 01:26:02PM +0100, Christian Grothoff wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> GNU has been approved by Google to participate in GSoC 2016. For GNUnet,
> we have currently four ideas proposed. If you are interested in working
> on these, let us know. Also, if you want to point other people
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 01:01:01PM +0100, Martin Schanzenbach wrote:
> At this point, if your GNUnet node does not expose the API over REST
> you are welcome to use sockets/custom JSON-RPC in your code for mobile
> (Android) and browser (JS) but then say hello to the year 1998.
> Today, apps
Hello again, Dan & Martin!
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 04:48:10PM +0200, Daniel Golle wrote:
> > Great. We already have an extensive jspsyc library that we used in
> > the psyczilla add-on for mozilla. It uses native sockets.
>
> That's the kinda stuff I was thinking of. JSON is useful beyond HTTP.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 01:04:01PM +0200, Daniel Golle wrote:
> Why are you specifying it to HTTP-based at all?
Are all browsers able to use localhost bus solutions and sockets?
> I believe a *re-usable* JSON-RPC, which could either be accessed via
> HTTP but just as well using a local socket or
On 02/15/2016 12:11 PM, Martin Schanzenbach wrote:
> RESTful GNUnet
>
> Design and implementation of REST APIs (http://jsonapi.org/) that
> expose the GNUnet API (https://gnunet.org/doxygen/modules.html) so that
> easy, hands-on development is possible. Also, browser-based UIs will be
> much
There is a meeting on the topic of doing secushare GUIs
in Berlin today. Ask in our chatroom if you're in town.
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 03:46:24AM +0300, LRN wrote:
> How are you going to call it? How about WhatsGNU? :)
Also a possibility.
See www.secushare.org for more.
--
E-mail is
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:23:10PM -0700, Ed Baskerville wrote:
An appealing narrative, but I don't buy it. Let's say the distributed social
network gains traction among on libre platforms. Then your plan is to
implement a jailbreaking tool that iPhone users will install in order to
connect
Sorry for the break of thread, the HTML view doesn't show the
Message-Id for me to refer to.
I was thinking of writing up an ebuild recipe for gentoo, that would
have a whole lot in common with Daniel's excellent openwrt Makefile.
To avoid further duplication I can imagine it would be practical
77 matches
Mail list logo
