Hi!
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019, 15:57 t3sserakt wrote:
> Hi Marcos,
>
> welcome and cool you are interested in helping with groupchat.
>
> Submitting a patch in Mantis is not the way it used to be, but your
> contribution was valuable.
>
> Did you read here
Hey all,
It's me again, with another proposal to meet.
To make clear: All of these proposals are just about sitting and hacking
together, with the deep believe that this can be very productive and
also fun.
Each one of them is also very suitable for newcomers!
So, here it is:
Some years back
On 6/27/19 7:28 PM, Schanzenbach, Martin wrote:
> As I understood this really has nothing to do with the eV or the
> organisational form (in legal terms).
>
> It was more related to how to organise processes within the GNUnet
> project/community.
>
> Regarding the eV/making profit: AFAIK the
As I understood this really has nothing to do with the eV or the
organisational form (in legal terms).
It was more related to how to organise processes within the GNUnet
project/community.
Regarding the eV/making profit: AFAIK the GUNnet eV is already _for_ profit
even if it does
not actively
Hi,
I don't understand why this is open for discussion, as it seems.
Exploration should be up to the listed members of the eV, which is one of the
points
exclusive to the eV where a difference of groups makes sense.
I was not around, but I was told it's just exploration atm.
Fabian Gerlach
Hi Marcos,
welcome and cool you are interested in helping with groupchat.
Submitting a patch in Mantis is not the way it used to be, but your
contribution was valuable.
Did you read here https://docs.gnunet.org/#Developer-Introduction? Be
careful, because the information in the C Tutorial, if
Hi,
since you just started the webpage discussion may I ask you to add two
additional chapter :
Comparing GNUnet to other projects
Beside the classical Tor, I2P/d, Freenet, ... personally, I would be very
interested in the comparison between GNUnet and Lokinet
