Re: Privacy Implications Of Signing Keys

2005-06-18 Thread Alphax
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Psy-Kosh wrote: Not to mention that anyone can sign keys, independant of the will of the key's owner. (I think a protocol to actually remove unwanted sigs from a key may be useful. (ie, a way to have the removal propagated by the keyservers))

Re: Corrupt keys

2005-06-18 Thread Werner Koch
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 18:28:59 +0930, Alphax said: Recently, I discovered the following message on GPG startup: gpg: signature packet without timestamp gpg in general needs the timestamp of the signature to figure out the latest signature. However when the signature is not used we should not

RE: How to detect inline PGP in mails! Best practice?

2005-06-18 Thread Kiefer, Sascha
Thanks. I use a similar approaches... I just finished (more less) the part yesterday where the body is text/html only and does not have an alternative text/plain. What i figuered that you can pipe any content (encrypted or/and signed) to gnupg using the option --decrypt and it will verify and/or

Re: How to detect inline PGP in mails! Best practice?

2005-06-18 Thread Alain Bench
Hello Patrick, On Friday, June 17, 2005 at 7:44:49 PM +0200, Patrick Brunschwig wrote: what I do in Enigmail. For attachments, I'm looking at the content-type (application/pgp-*) What about the types Mutt generates since version 1.5.1: | Content-Type: text/plain;

RE: How to detect inline PGP in mails! Best practice?

2005-06-18 Thread Kiefer, Sascha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm not aware of that. Are u using mutt? May u send me a signed, encrypted and your public key so i can get the idea? Regards, Sascha -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alain Bench Sent: