Maybe off topic.If so please point me in the right direction. OS is WIN XP
SP2
I have just installed the latest WinPT front-end 1.0rc2 from their web site.
I want to use my installed gpg 1.4.2 but it will not run. It produces an
error stating that it needs gpg 1.1 or higher. It runs OK with
On Thu Sep 08 2005; 16:04, Graeme Nichols wrote:
I have just installed the latest WinPT front-end 1.0rc2 from their web
site. I want to use my installed gpg 1.4.2 but it will not run. It produces
an error stating that it needs gpg 1.1 or higher. It runs OK with the
The SF.net site of WinPT
On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 15:30:39 +0200, Zeljko Vrba said:
1. PKCS#11
2. MS CAPI
3. vendor's proprietary API
4. do not support the HW at all
Pick your poison :)
Werner has chosen 4. for GnuPG, contrary to wishes of GnuPG users.
Not true. I simply do not have a 4758 or other tokens here.
Am 7 Sep 2005 um 19:23 hat David Shaw geschrieben:
I can't seem to duplicate your problem here. Are you sure you
saved the result when you exited from --edit-key?
As you can see, I did.
I get the message 'already clean', but the sigs are still there.
In spite the output being partly in
Does anyone know why there still isn't a Debian package for version 1.4.2
of GnuPG? http://packages.debian.org/gnupg
Oskar
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Oskar == Oskar L
No Debian package for 1.4.2
Thu, 8 Sep 2005 20:26:10 +0300 (EEST)
Oskar Does anyone know why there still isn't a Debian package for
Oskar version 1.4.2 of GnuPG? http://packages.debian.org/gnupg
You can file a Debian wishlist bug report against gnupg. See
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 10:25:20AM +0200, Dirk Traulsen wrote:
Am 7 Sep 2005 um 19:23 hat David Shaw geschrieben:
I can't seem to duplicate your problem here. Are you sure you
saved the result when you exited from --edit-key?
As you can see, I did.
I get the message 'already clean',
Am 8 Sep 2005 um 16:00 hat David Shaw geschrieben:
I'm trying, but I still can't duplicate the problem. Can you put
together a simple keyring and simple gpg.conf file that still shows
the problem?
I did what you asked me to do and now I'm completely confused!
First I deleted my gpg.conf,
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 12:33:47AM +0200, Dirk Traulsen wrote:
Am 8 Sep 2005 um 16:00 hat David Shaw geschrieben:
I'm trying, but I still can't duplicate the problem. Can you put
together a simple keyring and simple gpg.conf file that still shows
the problem?
I did what you asked me
I imagine it's because stable is frozen. Hence only fixes will get in
- and not new vewsions.
(I maybe wrong on that.)
(Naturally that only applies to stable..)
Building and installing your own gnupg.deb from gnupg.org sources has
significant merits though.
(For those unfamilar its a three
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 08:00:25PM -0400, David Shaw wrote:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 12:33:47AM +0200, Dirk Traulsen wrote:
3. Because now I was irritated, I did the same again with a different
keyserver 'keyserver.kjsl.com' and I got a completely different
result! When I fetched the key
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 10:08:24PM -0400, Jason Harris wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 08:00:25PM -0400, David Shaw wrote:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 12:33:47AM +0200, Dirk Traulsen wrote:
3. Because now I was irritated, I did the same again with a different
keyserver 'keyserver.kjsl.com'
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 10:28:29PM -0400, David Shaw wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 10:08:24PM -0400, Jason Harris wrote:
keyserver.kjsl.com is now stripping all GD sigs. The extra variable
in kd_search.c and code for 'case 2:' of make_keys_elem(), respectively:
It's your keyserver, and
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 11:10:23PM -0400, Jason Harris wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 10:28:29PM -0400, David Shaw wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 10:08:24PM -0400, Jason Harris wrote:
keyserver.kjsl.com is now stripping all GD sigs. The extra variable
in kd_search.c and code for 'case
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roscoe wrote:
I imagine it's because stable is frozen. Hence only fixes will get
in - and not new vewsions. (I maybe wrong on that.) (Naturally that
only applies to stable..)
Building and installing your own gnupg.deb from gnupg.org sources
has
15 matches
Mail list logo
