-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Recently, when checking my trustb I get the following appearing:
gpg: buffer shorter than subpacket
gpg: signature packet without keyid
gpg: buffer shorter than subpacket
gpg: buffer shorter than subpacket
gpg: signature packet without timestamp
Le Tue 25/10/2005, Alphax disait
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Recently, when checking my trustb I get the following appearing:
gpg: buffer shorter than subpacket
gpg: signature packet without keyid
gpg: buffer shorter than subpacket
gpg: buffer shorter than subpacket
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:53:51PM +0930, Alphax wrote:
Recently, when checking my trustb I get the following appearing:
gpg: buffer shorter than subpacket
gpg: signature packet without keyid
gpg: buffer shorter than subpacket
gpg: buffer shorter than subpacket
gpg: signature packet
Erwan David wrote:
Le Tue 25/10/2005, Alphax disait
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Recently, when checking my trustb I get the following appearing:
gpg: buffer shorter than subpacket
gpg: signature packet without keyid
gpg: buffer shorter than subpacket
gpg: buffer shorter
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:49:12AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
I got this when I retrieved the PGP GD key via hkp.
REmoving this key from my keyring was enough to suppress those
messages.
I had a similar problem with the version of the key that I received from
hkp. I downloaded the key
David Shaw wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 04:21:32PM -0500, Alex Mauer wrote:
I don't agree with this. The user ID system in all OpenPGP products
gives a regular UTF-8 string. Signatures simply bind that string to
the primary key. The system says exactly Alex Mauer belongs with key
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 06:22:10PM -0500, Alex Mauer wrote:
David Shaw wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 04:21:32PM -0500, Alex Mauer wrote:
I don't agree with this. The user ID system in all OpenPGP products
gives a regular UTF-8 string. Signatures simply bind that string to
the
David Shaw wrote:
Some people (myself included) check both before signing. The name via
some sort of formal ID, and the email via a mail challenge.
As do I, at least for a level 3 signature.
Still, if you don't want to bind both tokens together, just create an
user ID of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 08:50:11PM -0500, Alex Mauer wrote:
David Shaw wrote:
Some people (myself included) check both before signing. The name via
some sort of formal ID, and the email via a mail challenge.
As do I, at least for a level 3 signature.
Still, if you don't want to bind both
