Am 11 Sep 2005 um 23:01 hat David Shaw geschrieben:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 09:59:53AM -0500, John Clizbe wrote:
David Shaw wrote:
There is perhaps an argument to be made for a
super clean that does clean and also removes any
signature where the signing key is
not present (in
Joost van Baal wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:38:49PM -0400, David Shaw wrote:
It's not an issue of improving the trust, it's an issue of
disambiguation. In my case, there are many different David Shaws out
there, including a furniture designer in New Zealand, a Pulitzer prize
winning
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 21:37:06 +0200, Peter Engel said:
I have a class-2 cardreader (meaning: with integreated keypad for
entering the PIN). I found no clue yet wether GnuPG supports the
integrated keypad for entering the PIN. (using GnuPG v.1.4.2)
I am working on this. It has turned out to
David Shaw wrote:
Some people
will not sign such a user ID though,
It's not an issue of improving the trust, it's an issue of
disambiguation.
Right, so why is it any better to have a key with:
0x99242560 David Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
than to have
0x99242560 David Shaw
0x99242560 [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
I have the gpgol-0.9.3 plug-in installed in Outlook 2003 running on
Windows XP Pro.
It resolved the 'crash on signing' issues I was having with the older
plug-in, thanks!
Now I have a couple of questions:
Is there a way to set the default key
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 08:01:15PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
I wouldn't sign the email only one because an email address can be accessible
to more than one person. If I'm encrypting to this key, I want to know to
WHOM I am writing.
In some cases you can't to WHOM you are writing. What
Sorry, I earlier posted this with an old thread in the subject.
PGP 9 stores the file name in the encrypted data. You can take a file
xyz.pgp, decrypt it, and return it to the original My Word Doc.DOC. There
is nothing externally visible, either in a PGP Partitioned message, nor in a
hex dump
I hope this isn't something already discussed that I overlooked in the
list..
PGP 9 stores the file name in the encrypted data. You can take a file
xyz.pgp, decrypt it, and return it to the original My Word Doc.DOC. There
is nothing externally visible, either in a PGP Partitioned message, nor
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 02:50:30PM -0500, Wes wrote:
I hope this isn't something already discussed that I overlooked in the
list..
PGP 9 stores the file name in the encrypted data. You can take a file
xyz.pgp, decrypt it, and return it to the original My Word Doc.DOC. There
is nothing
Instead of --decrypt, use
gpg --use-embedded-filename myfile.pgp
--- Wes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I earlier posted this with an old thread in
the subject.
PGP 9 stores the file name in the encrypted data.
You can take a file
xyz.pgp, decrypt it, and return it to the original
Hi everybody.
(First of all sorry for crossposting to *devel and *users,.. I supposed
users list would be the appropriate,.. but Werner supposed *devel,.. so
I took both)
I have lots of general and specific questions about OpenPGP/GnuPG.
First of all I'd like to say that I've already read
11 matches
Mail list logo
