Charly Avital wrote:
Thanks for the information. I have never succeeded to build gpg 1.9.xx
on MacOS, in spite of help and tips from WK, so I gave it up.
If you are kind enough to keep posting your findings and tips, I shall
be very grateful.
Charly
Well, everything seems to work as
On Wed, 08 Mar 2006, David Shaw wrote:
Thanks, that seems to work (as does --expert and sign).
If you're tracking SVN, try the latest. I've added a notation command
under --edit-key.
Great, thanks. Adding notations and removing all of them works just
fine.
According to the manual page,
GnuPG does not detect injection of unsigned data
(released 2006-03-09, CVE-2006-0049)
Summary
===
In the aftermath of the false positive signature verfication bug
(announced 2006-02-15) more thorough
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 10:52:53PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
On Thu, 09 Mar 2006, David Shaw wrote:
Let's make it simpler: I just added the ability to delete notations
directly by using a minus sign prefix like [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Given these notations:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
in the announcement of the fix for this condition
on the gnupg announce list, it says the following:
=[ begin quoted text ]=
The only correct solution to this problem is to get rid of the
feature
to check concatenated signatures - this allows for strict checking
of
valid packet
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 05:55:43PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in the announcement of the fix for this condition
on the gnupg announce list, it says the following:
=[ begin quoted text ]=
The only correct solution to this problem is to get rid of the
feature
to check
We are pleased to announce the availability of the second release
candidate for the forthcoming 1.4.3 version of GnuPG:
ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/alpha/gnupg/gnupg-1.4.3rc2.tar.bz2 (3.0M)
ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/alpha/gnupg/gnupg-1.4.3rc2.tar.bz2.sig
SHA-1 checksums for the above files
