Re: GnuPG asks for confirmation...

2006-06-03 Thread Todd Zullinger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 engage wrote: On Thursday 01 June 2006 08:59 pm, Todd Zullinger wrote: engage wrote: Why is someone sending an encrypted message to this list? It's not encrypted. It's just signed and armored. Doesn't your mail client automatically display this

Info on sub keys?

2006-06-03 Thread Felix E. Klee
I've a couple of newbee questions concerning sub keys: * Aside from convenience, is there any difference between a sub key and an ordinary key signed with the master key? * Can such an ordinary key be transformed into a sub key? * Since when (date and version) does PGP and since when does

Re: Info on sub keys?

2006-06-03 Thread Felix E. Klee
At Sun, 04 Jun 2006 03:02:19 +0930, Alphax wrote: A subkey cannot issue a certification signature - at least not in any known implementations. Right, I read about that before. PGP 8 supports signing subkeys; no other offical version of PGP before then does. According to Tom McCune's FAQ

Re: GnuPG asks for confirmation...

2006-06-03 Thread Ingo Klöcker
On Saturday 03 June 2006 04:57, engage wrote: On Thursday 01 June 2006 08:59 pm, Todd Zullinger wrote: engage wrote: Why is someone sending an encrypted message to this list? It's not encrypted. It's just signed and armored. Doesn't your mail client automatically display this for you?

Re[2]: GnuPG asks for confirmation...

2006-06-03 Thread Sean Rima
Hello Ingo, Saturday, June 3, 2006, 9:19:36 PM, you wrote: On Saturday 03 June 2006 04:57, engage wrote: On Thursday 01 June 2006 08:59 pm, Todd Zullinger wrote: engage wrote: Why is someone sending an encrypted message to this list? It's not encrypted. It's just signed and armored.