Todd Zullinger wrote:
Eray Aslan wrote:
Surely there must be a better way. These all require admin access
to the IMAP server. The software already does what I want some of
the time (when I send the recipient encrypted email). I just want
it to do it all the time.
This doesn't like an
John Clizbe wrote:
[snip]
There is no provision for processing a message on multiple paths and
specifying
separate handling on each path when sending, nor would it be reasonable to
expect there to be.
Ahh, this is the problem.
There are two RFEs filed in Bugzilla to allow the unencrypted
John Clizbe wrote:
Sounds unreasonable to me. It's completely beyond our scope to
implement.
That seems more like not feasible than unreasonable. But the results
are the same. :-)
Thank you for the explanation.
--
ToddOpenPGP - KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
Eray Aslan wrote:
I thought it was a mis-configuration on my part.
Nope. As John pointed out this is simply not feasible to do from
within Enigmail based on the way it has to interact with Thunderbird.
If you don't trust the IMAP server admins, then you should store
your mail somewhere you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Eray Aslan wrote:
Please tell if there is an alternative.
Your best alternative at this point is to hire a professional
information security consultant. Your needs are highly specialized.
That means that nobody here can give you good advice on
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
Your best alternative at this point is to hire a professional
information security consultant.
[snip]
I'll fight for the budget but it's not likely. Thanks anyway.
--
Eray
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
hello all ,
i'm trying to import my belgium eID card but it only imports the belgium Root CA
this is the output i get
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/.gnupg gpgsm --learn-card
gpgsm[6605]: can't connect to `/tmp/gpg-GXgusb/S.gpg-agent': No such file or
directory
gpgsm: can't connect to the agent - trying
John Clizbe wrote:
Eray Aslan wrote:
The servers in question already have encryption at the file system level
with cryptsetupLUKS for Linux and truecrypt for windows boxes. But the
trouble is these do not provide any defense against attacks through the
network. They will happily serve the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA224
Was Tue, 05 Dec 2006, at 16:06:56 -0600,
when Robert J. Hansen wrote:
Whether you're secular or religious, atheist or devout, I think we can
all agree that the time of the year known as Christmas will soon be upon
us. This is
Randy Burns wrote the following on 12/5/06 9:01 PM:
It's a great idea. A more direct link is:
https://www.fsf.org/associate/support_freedom/donate
Randy
--- Robert J. Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
This year, I'm giving $10 to the Free Software Foundation
(http://www.fsf.org) in
Hi,
I'm scripting a Tcl/Tk frontend using Expect extension. It's all right up to
GnuPG 1.4.2.
With GnuPG 1.4.5, the spawned process from tcl script (spawn gpg --no-use-agent
--edit-key 0x12345678) echoes back character by character everything is sent to
gpg.
So my tcl script receive back a mix
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yes, I will join in too and donate to the FSF, as a strong supporter of
enabling *free speech* (GnuPG and other crypto/anonimity products), and
free software in general.
Peter.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment:
On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 10:59:14 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Send Gnupg-users mailing list submissions to
gnupg-users@gnupg.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
or, via email, send a message with subject
Peter Stoddard wrote:
Hi folks
I tried compiling Gnupg 2.0.1 on a 733 MHz PowerPC G4 running Mac OSX
10.4.8 and the make failed with the following error:
In file included from sysutils.c:41:
i18n.h:27:23: error: libintl.h: No such file or directory
sysutils.c: In function
Todd Zullinger wrote:
That seems more like not feasible than unreasonable. But the results
are the same. :-)
Infeasible: we have the manpower, we have the tools, we have the
talent, but the architecture is working against us in a big way.
Unreasonable: our manpower is stretched so thin that
On Dec 6, 2006, at 10:33 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
Peter Stoddard wrote:
Hi folks
I tried compiling Gnupg 2.0.1 on a 733 MHz PowerPC G4 running Mac OSX
10.4.8 and the make failed with the following error:
In file included from sysutils.c:41:
i18n.h:27:23: error: libintl.h: No such file or
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
Todd Zullinger wrote:
That seems more like not feasible than unreasonable. But the
results are the same. :-)
Infeasible: we have the manpower, we have the tools, we have the
talent, but the architecture is working against us in a big way.
Unreasonable: our
I was updating my system to 1.4.6 today and noticed the following in
the make install output (I've got 2.0.1 installed already):
install-info: menu item `gpg' already exists, for file `gnupg'
I don't recall seeing this before, but I don't use the info docs much,
so maybe I've just missed it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Todd Zullinger wrote the following on 12/6/06 11:37 PM:
I was updating my system to 1.4.6 today and noticed the following in
the make install output (I've got 2.0.1 installed already):
install-info: menu item `gpg' already exists, for file
Charly Avital wrote:
I am MacOS X user (10.4.6), unable till now to compile 2.0.1 (posted
a few messages explaining why).
If you are MacOS X user, could you please explain how you succeeded
to compile 2.0.1. Thanks.
Sorry, I'm using linux.
--
ToddOpenPGP - KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL:
20 matches
Mail list logo
