Hello Martin !
Martin Bretschneider mailing-lists-m...@bretschneidernet.de wrote:
I want to recreate my GnuPG keys. My question is if I can omit the email
address? Since I do not want my email addresses to appear on the
keyservers because of spammers and so on. I only want to put my name and
Am Samstag 27 Februar 2010 schrieb Laurent Jumet:
Hi Laurent,
Martin Bretschneider mailing-lists-m...@bretschneidernet.de wrote:
I want to recreate my GnuPG keys. My question is if I can omit the
email address? Since I do not want my email addresses to appear on
the keyservers because of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Jerry wrote:
Maybe not totally apropos to this discussion; however, I worked in
traffic analysis for several years. If given enough leeway, you would
be amazed at the information you can gather about an individual, and at
its astonishing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
news of the 8.8, or 8.3 earthquake that has stricken Chile have been
posted in many on-line dailies.
I have tried unsuccessfully to access a few portals in Chile (e.g. White
Pages, the dailies) they seem to be down.
I have also tried
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 08:24:07 -0500
John W. Moore III jmoore...@bellsouth.net articulated:
UAV Missile Operators don't need to know what the message said; just
where You are at the time it is Sent. Radio transmissions are
targeted using Huff-Duff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hello Martin !
Martin Bretschneider mailing-lists-m...@bretschneidernet.de wrote:
You can use whatever you want to identify your key.
But in some cases, mail programs expect to find your e-mail.
that was my expectation as well. But
On Feb 26, 2010, at 12:04 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
In some cases, the authorities knowing an individual used encryption
could be a problem.
Why? Because they have a key on the keyservers? If this is what you're
worried about, rest easy: there are so many easier ways to learn whether
Am Samstag 27 Februar 2010 schrieb Laurent Jumet:
Hello Martin !
Martin Bretschneider mailing-lists-m...@bretschneidernet.de wrote:
You can use whatever you want to identify your key.
But in some cases, mail programs expect to find your e-mail.
that was my expectation as well.
On 2/27/10 9:58 AM, David Shaw wrote:
Do you really mean to suggest that a US authority getting email
headers - even without a warrant - is easier than typing a name into
a search box on a keyserver?
No. You're right, that's clearly easier. However, that only tells you
whether someone has
On 2/27/2010 5:50 AM, Martin Bretschneider wrote:
that was my expectation as well. But what do the email clients do then?
Do they say no key available or do the look for the name? What are
your experiences?
TIA Martin
Enigmail will lookup the key by key ID (0xDEADBEEF) when you tell it
Hello Martin !
Martin Bretschneider mailing-lists-m...@bretschneidernet.de wrote:
It's not easy to answer that question, as it depends on your own
system. When you read a signed message, GPG provides a way to call
automatically the sender's public key on your designed servers, when
On Saturday 27 February 2010, Martin Bretschneider wrote:
Am Samstag 27 Februar 2010 schrieb Laurent Jumet:
Hi Laurent,
Martin Bretschneider mailing-lists-m...@bretschneidernet.de wrote:
I want to recreate my GnuPG keys. My question is if I can omit
the email address? Since I do not
On 02/26/10 10:34, Martin Bretschneider wrote:
Hi,
I want to recreate my GnuPG keys. My question is if I can omit the email
address? Since I do not want my email addresses to appear on the
keyservers because of spammers and so on.
1. It's been repeated many times on the list that those
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Saturday 27 February 2010 at 6:11:29 AM, in
mid:4b88b791.7000...@sixdemonbag.org, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
There is a perceived need for $150 bowls of soup, as
evidenced by dozens of high-priced gourmet restaurants
in major cities. The
On Feb 27, 2010, at 11:22 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
On 2/27/10 9:58 AM, David Shaw wrote:
Do you really mean to suggest that a US authority getting email
headers - even without a warrant - is easier than typing a name into
a search box on a keyserver?
No. You're right, that's clearly
On Feb 27, 2010, at 2:21 PM, MFPA wrote:
I have always been taught to challenge the status quo. Because that's
the way we do it is *never* a good reason to continue doing something
in a particular way.
The status quo has something going for it: it works. 95% of all new ideas are
awful and
On Feb 27, 2010, at 3:02 PM, David Shaw wrote:
Much as the email headers do in your example. If the mail is not encrypted,
the headers just show that it might be. In practice, headers won't show much
as the majority of modern mail programs have the capability for encryption of
one sort
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi Martin
On Saturday 27 February 2010 at 10:50:13 AM, you wrote:
that was my expectation as well. But what do the email clients do then?
Do they say no key available or do the look for the name? What are
your experiences?
I use The Bat!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Saturday 27 February 2010 at 4:22:27 PM, in
mid:4b8946c3.5050...@sixdemonbag.org, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
His position seems to have shifted.
As the thread has progressed, the posts I'm replying to have shifted
from It is a good idea to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi Robert
On Saturday 27 February 2010 at 8:23:25 PM, you wrote:
On Feb 27, 2010, at 3:02 PM, David Shaw wrote:
With regards to the second statement, you give a great reason
yourself a few paragraphs up: If you live in Cuba and you're using
And whist you have stated that you check first, you have advocated
that it's OK not to. Somebody following your advice could land this
hypothetical Cuban in a whole lot of trouble.
The hypothetical Cuban had a lot bigger problems the instant he shared his
public key with people he shouldn't
On Feb 27, 2010, at 4:10 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
Keep it on the list, please, and not in private mail.
Oh, ack. I completely misread the To- line, and didn't see the cc: to
gnupg-users. My error, and my apologies to MFPA. :)
___
Gnupg-users
Hi Charly
On Saturday 27 February 2010 at 1:29:22 PM, you wrote:
I have also e-mailed Faramir directly, trying to have news.
Farimir has just posted on PGPNET that he is fine, his house resisted
the quake, his family are OK. Phones down so he has been unable to
contact some friends.
--
Doh! Originally sent off list... Maybe Robert got a psychic vibe...
On 2/27/2010 2:21 PM, MFPA wrote:
I don't want such a vote. Whether somebody chooses to include an email
address in their UID is up to the individual. I have not seen anything
that convinces me it is better for me to
This may be a dup - I think the original went out with the wrong From addr
MFPA wrote:
Hi
On Saturday 27 February 2010 at 6:11:29 AM, in
mid:4b88b791.7000...@sixdemonbag.org, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
In any case, I've never seen a convincing argument *for* including email
addresses in the
On Sat, 2010-02-27 at 19:21 +, MFPA wrote:
There is a widespread perception (rightly or wrongly) that exposing
your email address publicly on the internet will lead to that email
address being spammed into oblivion. The new openPGP user is exhorted
to create a key pair using their name and
MFPA wrote:
Hi
On Saturday 27 February 2010 at 6:11:29 AM, in
mid:4b88b791.7000...@sixdemonbag.org, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
In any case, I've never seen a convincing argument *for* including email
addresses in the UID of a PGP key.
Nor have we seen compelling arguments for their omission
On 02/27/10 14:21, John Clizbe wrote:
Nor have we seen compelling arguments for their omission as a general rule
I think it would be more accurate to say that we haven't seen any
arguments that will sway those with strongly held beliefs on either
side. Since we're not likely to see them any time
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
February 27th 2010 in gnupg-users@gnupg.org thread Hot to give the
keyword from the command line.
Hi, I'm doing a bash script for pack (Tar), compress (lzip or bzip2)
and encrypt (GPG with Rijndael 128) very important files, but is
supposed to be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi Robert
On Saturday 27 February 2010 at 8:03:15 PM, you wrote:
On Feb 27, 2010, at 2:21 PM, MFPA wrote:
I have always been taught to challenge the status quo. Because that's
the way we do it is *never* a good reason to continue doing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi Grant
On Saturday 27 February 2010 at 9:54:56 PM, you wrote:
It sounds like you're using the software to do the opposite thing that
many people do. I think digital signatures are utilized much more than
encrypted communication.
I don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi Paul
On Saturday 27 February 2010 at 11:19:43 PM, you wrote:
GnuPG doesn't, at least as of 1.4.10, force you to include an e-mail
address in your user ID. It merely requests an e-mail address, and you
can just press enter and ignore the
On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 04:33 +, MFPA wrote:
Speculation is great, but speculation isn't fact -- and we need to
change the way we do things based on facts, not on speculations. We
can agree on facts, but our speculations will likely not overlap very much
at all.
I'm sure anybody
I think that MFPA has succinctly summed up his point of view in these
two quotes.
On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 04:33 +, MFPA wrote:
What you're saying here is, even if the advice were sound for one
million users, and destructive to the privacy of just one, I still
would not change because any
Kind of let's agree to disagree?
More like, since you are reacting emotionally and refuse to even entertain the
possibility of being persuaded, there is no point in continuing this
conversation.
I wish you a pleasant day.
___
Gnupg-users mailing
Hello Mario !
Mario Castel n Castro mariocastelancas...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I'm doing a bash script for pack (Tar), compress (lzip or bzip2)
and encrypt (GPG with Rijndael 128) very important files, but is
supposed to be non interactive, shouldn't ask the user for password
when executed,
36 matches
Mail list logo
