Am Mittwoch 16 Juni 2010 00:20:37 schrieb M.B.Jr.:
don’t have to worry about actually housing the files: we can just post
them to the internet and let someone else assume the burden of storing
the files for us... I can do the same with my keys...
Is this crazy stuff?
No, because later he
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 04:06, alava...@gmail.com said:
But shall do so now, to ensure I am not offending you or others. But at
present I see no reply-to addresses in my headers.
That was not the problem. The owner of supp...@resell.biz uses
procmail/formail or similar to redirect certain
On Tue, 18 May 2010 08:57, beppeco...@yahoo.it said:
We understand that the problem is about FDSETSIZE.
PTH has been configured and compiled --with-fdsetsize=8192
Which should have installed a pth.h file with the test
#if defined(FD_SETSIZE)
#if FD_SETSIZE 8192
#error FD_SETSIZE is
should have installed a pth.h file with the test
#if defined(FD_SETSIZE)
I assume that your system picked up the old pth.h header and not the
one from the newly compiled pth.
There are 2 pth.h.
One is in /pth.20.07, while the other is in /usr/local/include and
both have the test
/*
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 at 1:46:30 AM, in
mid:4c16cd66.7000...@fifthhorseman.net, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 06/14/2010 07:54 PM, MFPA wrote:
On Monday 14 June 2010 at 6:19:58 PM, in
mid:4c1664be.1080...@fifthhorseman.net, Daniel Kahn
On 06/16/2010 01:03 PM, MFPA wrote:
Plus, if we can demonstrate that GnuPG cares about
minimizing costs to the user in terms of disk space, we
also stand in a better rhetorical position to encourage
development (or adoption) of alternate keyserver fetch
requests that could apply similar
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:39, beppeco...@yahoo.it said:
/* check if the user requests a bigger FD_SETSIZE .
#if defined(FD_SETSIZE) .
The next 2 is more important; the one below /usr/local should have a
#if FD_SETSIZE 8192
No? Then you did not install pth properly or gpg does not use
Am Mittwoch 16 Juni 2010 19:10:17 schrieb Daniel Kahn Gillmor:
Do you have other suggestions? We should consider bringing a
prioritized form of these to the sks-devel list.
A different approach might save even more bandwidth:
Most keys do now change often. It is useless to download a key that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Wednesday 16 June 2010 at 6:10:17 PM, in
mid:4c190579.40...@fifthhorseman.net, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 06/16/2010 01:03 PM, MFPA wrote:
What sort of alternate fetch requests do you envision?
Fetch-minimal? Fetch-no-photos?
I was
