On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 12:59:45 -0700, Paul Richard Ramer wrote:
681 Messages sent by members of the list
628 Encrypted messages
36 NETMK messages
37-41 Keys
37-40 Members
32 Members sent encrypted messages
13 Members were responsible for not encrypting to someone's key
12 Members sent NETMK
On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 20:30:22 -0400, Faramir wrote:
El 07-08-2010 15:59, Paul Richard Ramer escribió:
...
So for me that makes approximately 1 in 29 encrypted messages was not
encrypted to my key, 1 in 19 of all messages was a NETMK message, and 1
in 12 of all messages was either not encrypted
On 8/8/2010 3:39 AM, Paul Richard Ramer wrote:
True. In fact over a third of all NETMK messages (14 to be exact) were
to members who posted fewer than ten messages in that three month period.
This is expected, and it's not specific to PGPNET. Communication links
that get used tend to be
On Saturday 07 August 2010, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
On 8/7/2010 1:58 PM, MFPA wrote:
Whether fully automated or ran on demand, I'm quite surprised
*nobody* was interested.
One person said they would use it. The overall reaction was
negative. These things happen. Sometimes, the tool you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Sunday 8 August 2010 at 10:07:25 AM, in
mid:201008081107.30...@thufir.ingo-kloecker.de, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
On Saturday 07 August 2010, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
Sometimes, the tool you think people need isn't the
tool they want. :)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Saturday 7 August 2010 at 8:59:45 PM, in
mid:4c5dbb31.3090...@gmail.com, Paul Richard Ramer wrote:
Well, I have some numbers to show the frequency of
NETMK (Not Encrypted To My Key) messages. I was on the
PGPNET mailing list for just
On 8/8/2010 10:49 AM, MFPA wrote:
How many of these 22 were within the first week or so?
I find very few messages not encrypted to mine.
Again, network theory to the rescue. Generally speaking, nodes that
carry little traffic are responsible for more problems than those that
carry a lot.
On 8/8/2010 12:47 PM, wegwe...@gmx.de wrote:
Just a repetition of my question, in a different way:
Does anybody out there know of any script to brute force a
list of passphrases?
Ten lines of Perl will do it. However, you might be waiting a really
long time.
If you have lost your passphrase,
wegwe...@gmx.de wrote on 08.08.10 18:47:
Just a repetition of my question, in a different way:
Does anybody out there know of any script to brute force a
list of passphrases?
nasty. http://www.vanheusden.com/nasty/
Ludwig
___
Gnupg-users mailing
http://www.roguedaemon.net/rephrase/
or google.com
Cheers,
Chris.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 10:47 AM, wegwe...@gmx.de wrote:
Just a repetition of my question, in a different way:
Does anybody out there know of any script to brute force a
list of passphrases?
I never tried it before but maybe jack the ripper might help.
I've only heard of it, never tried it.
11 matches
Mail list logo
