Re: GPG and PGP

2011-03-17 Thread Johan Wevers
Op 16-3-2011 17:38, ved...@nym.hush.com schreef: I've had a problem running Disastry's PGP 2.6.3 multi6 on 64 bit windows systems, because the DOS command line window didn't work with even Disastry's 32 bit pgp.exe. That is because his executables are DOS executables and not win32

compatible with PGP/Desktop

2011-03-17 Thread Bill Albert
Is PGP/ENIGMAIL compatible with folks using Outlook or Microsoft Mail with PGP Desktop? I've tried searching for this but no luck,-- :-( ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: Running GnuPG smartcard with CTAPI?

2011-03-17 Thread Malte Gell
Am Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:02:43 +0100 schrieb Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org: On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:31, malte.g...@gmx.de said: currently I have some trouble to get my Cyberjack running with PCSC. So I wonder, can GnuPG (2.0.16) also work with CTAPI drivers? I doubt that. CTAPI has not been

Re: Language question

2011-03-17 Thread Ingo Klöcker
On Thursday 17 March 2011, Charly Avital wrote: Hi, when the user's locale is e.g. French, and she/he is generating a key in Terminal (or DOS prompt, if that's what it is called in Windows), is the interactive dialogue displayed in French (or in the language of the user's locale)? Ditto

Re: GPG and PGP

2011-03-17 Thread Ingo Klöcker
On Wednesday 16 March 2011, Mark H. Wood wrote: On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 09:15:45AM +0100, Johan Wevers wrote: Op 15-3-2011 21:32, Ben McGinnes schreef: That's probably a worthwhile discussion to have. Even if RFC1991 support is maintained, there's still value in migrating encrypted

Re: Language question

2011-03-17 Thread Charly Avital
Ingo Klöcker wrote the following on 3/17/11 3:41 PM: On Thursday 17 March 2011, Charly Avital wrote: Hi, when the user's locale is e.g. French, and she/he is generating a key in Terminal (or DOS prompt, if that's what it is called in Windows), is the interactive dialogue displayed in French

Re: GPG and PGP

2011-03-17 Thread Ingo Klöcker
On Wednesday 16 March 2011, Johan Wevers wrote: Op 15-3-2011 21:57, Ingo Klöcker schreef: Why migrate away? Even if GnuPG 3 stops supporting RFC1991 there will always be GnuPG 1 and GnuPG 2 around to decrypt ancient data and verify signatures made decades ago. If that is the case, you

keyservers

2011-03-17 Thread Andrew Long
Anyone else having problems accessing pool.sks-keyservers.net? I've tried pointing nslookup at a couple of the root DNS name servers and get DOMAIN (not known) Regards, Andy -- Andrew Long andrew dot long at mac dot com PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: keyservers

2011-03-17 Thread Grant Olson
On 3/17/11 4:43 PM, Andrew Long wrote: Anyone else having problems accessing pool.sks-keyservers.net? I've tried pointing nslookup at a couple of the root DNS name servers and get DOMAIN (not known) There were a few emails on sks-devel this morning. Apparently it is indeed down.

Re: keyservers

2011-03-17 Thread Charly Avital
Andrew Long wrote the following on 3/17/11 4:43 PM: Anyone else having problems accessing pool.sks-keyservers.net? I've tried pointing nslookup at a couple of the root DNS name servers and get DOMAIN (not known) Regards, Andy Was down two hours ago, still down now 5:30 PM DST. Charly