Looks like the answer to my question iz: Not legally. I was thinking
that IDEA was more than ten years old, which I thot meant that the
patent on it was expired. Silly me, though, looks like patent law
changed for about seven more years of length. So, while I'm waiting for
six months or whatever,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
To make a long story short.
I created a key with jenuine pgp 10.
I exported it with IDEA.
I made gpg 1.2.2 work with IDEA.
Making gpg 1.4.11 work with IDEA failed.
I changed my pass-phrase using --crypt-algo CAST5 with 1.2.2.
Now, enigmail works, so I am one
Hi,
I'm revisiting my gpg card issues to see if someone can help out.
I have now installed GPG4WIN 2.1.0 on a new 32bit Win7 and is having some (and
same) issues like before.
One is scdeamon.exe that at intervalls needs to be killed when it starts to
generate incorrect output.
Hi, all. Please CC me on any replies, as I am not subscribed to the list.
I have GPG installed on a Windows 2003 server (32-bit). Looking in the install
folder, it appears that it is GPG version 1.2.2.
I am having an issue when I try to decrypt a file whose decrypted size is
greater than 2
Many apologies! When I posted my question, I was laboring under some
misinformation provided by the file's originator. The file was apparently
inadvertently truncated before being transferred, but we did not know. When
the originator supplied an un-truncated file, it did successfully decrypt
Is it a bad idea to place your secring in dropbox?
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Is it a bad idea to place your secring in dropbox?
Depends entirely on the strength of your passphrase. With a strong enough
passphrase you could publish your secret certificates in the newspaper of
your choice and still be confident of their safety.
I have GPG installed on a Windows 2003 server (32-bit). Looking in the
install folder, it appears that it is GPG version 1.2.2.
I would recommend upgrading. GnuPG currently comes in two 'flavors': the
1.4.x track, and the 2.0.x track. Speaking very broadly, 1.4.x is better
for servers, while
On 7/19/11 5:24 PM, Jonathan Ely wrote:
Can somebody please link to or refer me to the site that
contains the latest version 1 of GnuPG? Thanks.
ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/binary/gnupg-w32cli-1.4.11.exe
Enjoy!
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Thanks. I should have known better to ask before I copied an FTP's link
location from the page. They made it a bit more difficult for me since
they no longer link it directly but as long as the FTP server is still
in existence I should be able to find it.
On 19/07/2011 07:37 PM, Robert J. Hansen
Reference Robert J. Hansen's 19 Jul 2011, 1504 (-0700), Re: secring
and dropbox:
Is it a bad idea to place your secring in dropbox?
Depends entirely on the strength of your passphrase. With a strong
enough passphrase you could publish your secret certificates in the
newspaper of your
Using a decent password generator and specifying a mix of upper and
lower case letters, digits, and special characters, how many total
characters -- as a minimum -- would you recommend such a password be?
Generate 16 random bytes, base-64 encode them, memorize the output. I use a
Python
On 2011-07-19 6:18 PM, Kara wrote:
Reference Robert J. Hansen's 19 Jul 2011, 1504 (-0700), Re: secring
and dropbox:
Is it a bad idea to place your secring in dropbox?
Depends entirely on the strength of your passphrase. With a strong
enough passphrase you could publish your secret
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 01:20:21AM +0200, J. Ottosson wrote:
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd;
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; xml:lang=en lang=enhead
title/title
Still with the HTML? This excerpt is from the Fedora mail list but it
applies to all lists:
It applies to those lists which have a policy on HTML mail identical to that of
the Fedora mailing list. This is not the same as all lists.
Why? HTML is designed for web pages, not emails, and uses a
I thinks it's a bad idea.
If exposure of private keys is acceptable, why not just using AES like
methods?
To backup private keys, I think printer is better, and more realiable than
dropbox like cloud storages. The security of dropbox is far from claimed,
don't trust them. see
Hey all,
I'd like to just point this out. On June 20th Dropbox has a security snafu[1].
Why trust a 3rd party when you could do it yourself? When it comes to
security and privacy there isn't much transparency. Maybe postmortem but not
upfront.
[1] http://blog.dropbox.com/?p=821
[1]
17 matches
Mail list logo
