On 29/07/2011 02:45, Jerome Baum wrote:
The very purpose of smartcards is to keep secret keys confidential and
secure. This is achieved by physical protection, different layers,
puzzling structure etc. This makes it very, very difficult to extract
the keys. For a state-of-the-art smart card
On 29/07/2011 06:03, Jay Litwyn wrote:
The beauty is that this protection can be provided without the
burden for the user to remember a long passphrase, since this is not
required to encrypt the keys.
You could use random symmetric encryption keys and encrypt them with a
short passphrase:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 02:05, Crypto Stick
cryptost...@privacyfoundation.de wrote:
For a state-of-the-art smart card like the OpenPGP Card 2, I
guess the price tag would be around 100.000 Euros
100.000 as a one-time investment for breaking into an unlimited number
of OpenPGP smart cards? If I
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:58, rich...@r-selected.de said:
100.000 as a one-time investment for breaking into an unlimited number
of OpenPGP smart cards? If I were a government, I would definitely buy
Whatever the number is, it is for each break and you have only a certain
probability so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Thursday 28 July 2011 at 4:22:52 PM, in
mid:4e317ecc.1060...@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca, Jay Litwyn wrote:
Do not sign my photo until you see me in person,
OK, fair enough. If the key has WoT signatures from people I trust to
have such a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Thursday 28 July 2011 at 7:15:16 PM, in
mid:4e31a734.2000...@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca, Jay Litwyn wrote:
That's why void appears in my public key. Neither PGP
10, nor gpg were going to allow me to leave my given
and family names blank;
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 2011-07-29 6:03 PM, MFPA wrote:
Hi
On Thursday 28 July 2011 at 4:22:52 PM, in
mid:4e317ecc.1060...@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca, Jay Litwyn wrote:
Do not sign my photo until you see me in person,
OK, fair enough. If the key has WoT signatures from
