The nice folks at the claws list helped me narrow down my problem, as
you can see below. I'm using gnupg 2 normally, but I tried switching to
gnupg 1 and that didn't help. I'm using gpgme-1.3.1.
Any suggestions on how I can debug why gpgme is not recognizing that
there is a signature in the
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 04:54, markr-gn...@signal100.com said:
If anyone from GnuPG is reading this, please don't stop building (and
providing links to) Windows binaries for GnuPG 1.x. I'm sure I can't be
I deliberately removed the link. For those who really really need 1.4
for Windows, they
Hello!
How to verify if a certificate (in keyring) is valid?
I tried to encrypt file using gpgsm and no key specifiying methods worked
(http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2011-August/042580.html)
Could that be caused by invalid certificate?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
So I'm currently running 1.4.10 for GNU/Linux even though I know that
2.0 has been out for a while. I chose to stick with 1.4.10 and 1.4.11
because I don't like having to use pinentry since it doesn't support cut
and paste. My questions are these:
I've been using PGP 8.1 under Windows XP, but have to find a new GUI to use
under Windows 7. I found Gpg4win and figured out how to import my keyrings
bu changing the extension to gpg. I was able to decrypt a previously
encrypted file using gpg2.exe. There didn't seem to be a GUI. Reading thru
On 2011.08.22. 15:03, Werner Koch wrote:
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 11:07, y...@yyy.id.lv said:
How to verify if a certificate (in keyring) is valid?
gpgsm -k --with-validation USERID
without USERID all certifciates are validated. In case you want to skip
CRL checks, add the option
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 11:07, y...@yyy.id.lv said:
How to verify if a certificate (in keyring) is valid?
gpgsm -k --with-validation USERID
without USERID all certifciates are validated. In case you want to skip
CRL checks, add the option --disable-crl-checks.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org wrote:
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:29, papill...@gmail.com said:
because I don't like having to use pinentry since it doesn't support cut
and paste. My questions are these:
That is on purpose. If you have your passphrase on file for c+p
On 2011.08.22. 15:18, yyy wrote:
On 2011.08.22. 15:03, Werner Koch wrote:
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 11:07, y...@yyy.id.lv said:
How to verify if a certificate (in keyring) is valid?
gpgsm -k --with-validation USERID
without USERID all certifciates are validated. In case you want to skip
CRL
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 15:27, dpmc...@gmail.com said:
extremely shortsighted. Any password management program like Keepass
makes transfer via the clipboard easy and relatively safe (clearing it
after 10 seconds), so that doesn't sound like the safety of no
passphrase at all.
You may not
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 15:27, y...@yyy.id.lv said:
This certificate does not have BasicConstraints, maybe this is a cause
of error?
Quite likely. That is required for CA certifciates.
Is it possible to override check for BasicConstraints? Is it a bug?
Try adding the relax keyword to the
On 22/08/11 15:25, Werner Koch wrote:
BTW, pinentry is a separate package from GnuPG and easy to hack.
On this note, if anybody is interested, I recently wrote a pinentry
wrapper for password protecting a smartcard pin:
https://grepular.com/Protecting_PGP_Smartcards_from_Observation_Attacks
some of us use more than one email address. with GPG it is simple to add
a secondary ID to a key and this seems to work quite well.
when a change like this is made it is desirable to update the keyserver.
what happens when you re-upload a key to the keyserver? I hate to think
the keyserver
I was wondering something similar. I have a few keys which I have
invalidated and disabled but there is no way to delete them. I am using
this new key which I have not uploaded because if something happens and
I must re-create the key that will too become just clutter on the server.
On 22/08/2011
On 2011.08.22. 17:31, Werner Koch wrote:
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 15:27, y...@yyy.id.lv said:
This certificate does not have BasicConstraints, maybe this is a cause
of error?
Quite likely. That is required for CA certifciates.
Is it possible to override check for BasicConstraints? Is it a bug?
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 00:10, marshallabr...@comcast.net said:
encrypted file using gpg2.exe. There didn't seem to be a GUI. Reading thru
the manual, I see that there is supposed to be an extension/plug-in on the
Windows Explorer menu for GpgEX, but I don't see it. What should I do?
If you are
On 23/08/11 12:39 AM, Mike Acker wrote:
some of us use more than one email address. with GPG it is simple to
add a secondary ID to a key and this seems to work quite well.
when a change like this is made it is desirable to update the
keyserver. what happens when you re-upload a key to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/22/2011 07:01 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:29, papill...@gmail.com said:
because I don't like having to use pinentry since it doesn't support cut
and paste. My questions are these:
That is on purpose. If you have your
18 matches
Mail list logo
