On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 03:47, papill...@gmail.com said:
stored in a Keepass database that resides in a TrueCrypt container. It's
protected well. My actual key is protected by a 62 character passphrase
... as long as the box is pwoered down. Hard disk encryption does not
help if the box is up and
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:05, y...@yyy.id.lv said:
So, order of certificate hashes, relative of certificate order in
keyring, is critically important?
No. You need to make sure to not use lines of more than ~255
characters. Check that your editor didn't reflow a comment block or
similar.
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:44, mike_ac...@charter.net said:
result of a search... it would need to first search for the key by
whatever search text was provided, and then search for hits on the
fingerprint... if there is a revoke cert then you want to return that.
Keyservers store one copy of a
On 08/23/2011 02:04 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 03:47, papill...@gmail.com said:
Spying on X windows is pretty easy and thus Pinentry tries to make it
harder.
Werner,
Since I've never used Pinentry, I'm obviously missing something here.
While I'm aware that spying on X-Window
On 2011.08.23. 10:07, Werner Koch wrote:
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:05, y...@yyy.id.lv said:
So, order of certificate hashes, relative of certificate order in
keyring, is critically important?
No. You need to make sure to not use lines of more than ~255
characters. Check that your editor
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:39, y...@yyy.id.lv said:
For some certificates gpgsm asks during import, whether to trust them
(and if confirmed, add entry to trustlist.txt automatically). Is it
possible to make gpgsm to ask whether to trust it, for any certificate?
It does that for all proper
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 09:06, do...@dougbarton.us said:
Any suggestions on how I can debug why gpgme is not recognizing that
there is a signature in the message?
That is not enough information to help you.
To look at what gpgme is doing you may set an envvar before starting
claws like here:
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 10:02:30 +0200
Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org wrote:
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 09:06, do...@dougbarton.us said:
Any suggestions on how I can debug why gpgme is not recognizing that
there is a signature in the message?
That is not enough information to help you.
To look at
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 11:09, do...@dougbarton.us said:
Awesome, thanks! The problem turned out to be the fingerprint option in
Right, fingerprint is a command and may thus not be combined with other
commands.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein
On 08/23/2011 02:44, Werner Koch wrote:
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 11:09, do...@dougbarton.us said:
Awesome, thanks! The problem turned out to be the fingerprint option in
Right, fingerprint is a command and may thus not be combined with other
commands.
Well sure, it makes sense when you say it
I have 64-bit Windows 7. But there may be a hope. Microsoft has an
emulator/virtual machine called Windows XP Mode THAT runs many older Windows
XP programs and that are not natively compatible with Windows 7. Do you
know if Gpg4win will install GpgEX running in Windows XP Mode?
Werner Koch
Hi!
Am 20:59, schrieb Anthony Papillion:
My passphrases are
stored in a Keepass database that resides in a TrueCrypt container. It's
protected well. My actual key is protected by a 62 character passphrase
One could argue that this is equivalent to having a passphrase-less
keyring within the
Would it be reasonable to say that you may use a significantly smaller
PIN for your smartcard than would be required of a passphrase, since
the smartcard locks itself after 3 tries?
Since I don't use a reader with a pinpad, I must type my PIN in, and
thus have about 8 alpha-numeric characters for
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 15:12, da...@systemoverlord.com said:
Would it be reasonable to say that you may use a significantly smaller
PIN for your smartcard than would be required of a passphrase, since
the smartcard locks itself after 3 tries?
Yes. It is up to 6 tries because an attacker may also
Hello,
I use this syntax to sign files in a script--it works without problems,
but when trying to manually sign a file, I'm receiving the following
result:
gpg --batch --armor -keyring /Publib/.../ARP_pubring.gpg
--secret-keyring /Prodlib/.../ARP_secring.gpg --local-user 55EC3D41\!
--output
Michael Quigley/TheWay wrote on 08/23/2011 09:51:59 AM:
Hello,
I use this syntax to sign files in a script--it works without
problems, but when trying to manually sign a file, I'm receiving the
following result:
gpg --batch --armor -keyring /Publib/.../ARP_pubring.gpg --secret-
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:15:27AM -0400, michaelquig...@theway.org wrote:
gpg: conflicting commands
$
I'm sure I'm overlooking something simple, but I'm just not seeing it
today.
Okay -- I found the dash in clear-sign--which should read clearsign.
Of course I find it shortly after
On Tue Aug 23, 2011 at 09:51:59 -0400, michaelquig...@theway.org wrote:
Hello,
I use this syntax to sign files in a script--it works without problems,
but when trying to manually sign a file, I'm receiving the following
result:
gpg --batch --armor -keyring /Publib/.../ARP_pubring.gpg
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 15:51, michaelquig...@theway.org said:
gpg --batch --armor -keyring /Publib/.../ARP_pubring.gpg
This is the same as -k -e -y -r -i -n -g - thus you are asking for a key
lising and encryption ... - Use two dashes.
Back to the fingerprint
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org wrote:
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 15:12, da...@systemoverlord.com said:
Would it be reasonable to say that you may use a significantly smaller
PIN for your smartcard than would be required of a passphrase, since
the smartcard locks itself
On 8/23/11 12:43 PM, David Tomaschik wrote:
So even a 4-digit PIN would ensure a less than 1% chance of guessing
the PIN. (Assuming that the user does not select obvious pins like
birthdates, anniversaries, etc.) At 8 digits, the probability becomes
something like 6*10^-8, if I do the
On Thursday 18 August 2011, Alex (via GPGTools) wrote:
Hi there,
On 18.08.2011, at 20:39, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
why should it support something strange like a
multipart/alternative message with a text/plain part and a
PGP/MIME part.
isn't this what the message This is an OpenPGP/MIME
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
El 03-08-2011 9:40, ved...@nym.hush.com escribió:
Sorry, wrong link extension,
here is the correct one: http://www.pgpdump.net/
By the way, what would be required to run pgpdump locally? I guess
there is no compiled version for windows...
On 08/23/2011 06:52 PM, Faramir wrote:
El 03-08-2011 9:40, ved...@nym.hush.com escribió:
Sorry, wrong link extension,
here is the correct one: http://www.pgpdump.net/
By the way, what would be required to run pgpdump locally? I guess
there is no compiled version for windows...
Best
On 8/23/11 9:14 PM, David Tomaschik wrote:
I don't see a windows binary, but it looks to be written in pure C with
no external dependencies, so I would assume you could easily build it
under Cygwin.
Cygwin isn't necessary: it compiles just fine under plain MinGW. I've
got a native Win32
25 matches
Mail list logo
