-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Run sudo apt-get install bzip2 and see if that helps. Have you
changed your kernel at all?
David Manouchehri
On 8/25/2011 11:22 AM, Lance W. Haverkamp wrote:
gpg: invalid item `BZIP2' in preference string
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
On 26/08/11 3:37 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 17:22, la...@thehaverkamps.net said:
changing from 4096 to 8192 bit)
DON'T.
I understand the reasons for this, but is there any reason for not
using an 8kb (or larger) master/certification key with more normal
subkeys (e.g. a
Hi,
I have the problem that the process 'scim-bridge' crashes (segfault)
from time to time on my system. After that, keyboard input doesn't work
anymore and I have to kill and restart scim in a console outside of X. I
suspect that this problem is related to pinentry (gtk2) because it
happens just
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 11:00, b...@adversary.org said:
I understand the reasons for this, but is there any reason for not
using an 8kb (or larger) master/certification key with more normal
subkeys (e.g. a 2048-bit signing subkey and a 4096-bit encryption
Actually the primary keys are the most
On 26/08/11 11:05 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
Actually the primary keys are the most worry some.
That's a shame.
I have a one 8k key in my keyring
So do I, but it's mine and it is not used for correspondence at all.
and checking the key signatures made but that key takes a noticeable
time.
I
On 26-08-2011 15:05, Werner Koch wrote:
and also consider
that nowadays more and more low-processing power devices are used.
Does that mean we can expect GnuPG versions for mobile systems? I can't
wait to install a Symbian or Android port.
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
Johan Wevers
XKCD says it best: https://www.xkcd.com/538/
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org wrote:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 11:00, b...@adversary.org said:
I understand the reasons for this, but is there any reason for not
using an 8kb (or larger) master/certification key with more
Does that mean we can expect GnuPG versions for mobile systems? I can't
wait to install a Symbian or Android port.
There's APG for Android right now.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
My passphrases are
stored in a Keepass database that resides in a TrueCrypt container. It's
protected well. My actual key is protected by a 62 character passphrase
One could argue that this is equivalent to having a passphrase-less
keyring within the Truecrypt container.
Keepass is also
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 15:56, joh...@vulcan.xs4all.nl said:
Does that mean we can expect GnuPG versions for mobile systems? I can't
wait to install a Symbian or Android port.
Kmail (Kontact Touch) runs on the N900 (Linux based) and the HTC Touch
pro 2 (WindowsMobile 6.5). With full GnuPG crypto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
El 26-08-2011 12:35, Aaron Toponce escribió:
...
Also, 62-character passphrase might be a bit extreme, giving you a
false-sense of security. Using a truly random sequence of characters
from the 94-printable ASCII pool of characters, a
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Faramir faramir...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
El 26-08-2011 12:35, Aaron Toponce escribió:
...
Also, 62-character passphrase might be a bit extreme, giving you a
false-sense of security. Using a truly random sequence of
Actually I think https://www.xkcd.com/936/ says it better. :)
On 08/26/2011 11:08, David Tomaschik wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Faramir faramir...@gmail.com wrote:
El 26-08-2011 12:35, Aaron Toponce escribió:
...
Also, 62-character passphrase might be a bit extreme, giving you a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 8/26/2011 10:25 AM, Aaron Toponce wrote:
Oh, you can own an encrypted filesystem, even if the box is down. The
Evil Maid attack makes this trivial. And it doesn't matter the
encryption software used either.
I read about this attack a few
On 26/08/11 21:07, Anthony Papillion wrote:
Oh, you can own an encrypted filesystem, even if the box is down. The
Evil Maid attack makes this trivial. And it doesn't matter the
encryption software used either.
I read about this attack a few years ago on Bruce Scheiner's blog. It
scared the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
So in the course of another discussion on this group, I was told that I
might not actually need my 160+ random character passphrase for good
security. A few URL's were included, including this one
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/25/2011 11:02, Aaron Toponce wrote:
On 08/25/2011 11:56 AM, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
Do you want to sign every key in your keyring? If so, it's not
hard to get
On 08/26/2011 14:18, Nicholas Cole wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote:
http://dougbarton.us/PGP/gen_challenges.html
Dear Doug,
I don't mean this in a negative way, but I struggle to see the point
of such challenges.
So feel free not to use
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote:
One could certainly argue that my doing this is verification step is
overly fussy (and you wouldn't be the first), but that's my policy.
I honestly did not mean to be critical. I was just struggling to see
the security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
El 26-08-2011 15:08, David Tomaschik escribió:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Faramir faramir...@gmail.com
wrote:
According to keepass strength measurer, you can get more than 128
bits with just 30 characters (including some symbols of
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:29:04PM +0100, Nicholas Cole wrote:
I *do* see the uses for them. The debian keyring, for example is
huge, and it is useful to be able to selectively include it or not in
the gpg.conf file. But there more I've thought about this, the more I
think that it would be
On 08/26/2011 14:56, Nicholas Cole wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote:
One could certainly argue that my doing this is verification step is
overly fussy (and you wouldn't be the first), but that's my policy.
I honestly did not mean to be
[some snippage]
On 08/26/2011 14:29, Nicholas Cole wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote:
BTW, this is another one of the reasons that I find the ability to have
multiple keyrings useful, and would very much miss that functionality if
it disappeared
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/26/2011 16:45, Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 01:41:41PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
Actually I think https://www.xkcd.com/936/ says it better. :)
Yep, I was just going to comment that it's obvious that Randall Munroe
reads
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Actually Anthony, you are correct. It can't be defeated, or at least as
far as I know. What I was suggesting was to move the vulnerable part
(bootloader and kernel) of the system off to a portable storage device,
so it would be easier to keep an
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 01:41:41PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
Actually I think https://www.xkcd.com/936/ says it better. :)
Yep, I was just going to comment that it's obvious that Randall Munroe
reads this list :)
On 08/26/2011 11:08, David Tomaschik wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:31 PM,
26 matches
Mail list logo
