On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 01:46, marcus.brinkm...@ruhr-uni-bochum.de said:
not ask for data that is not available for whatever reason. I think your
interpretation of the regulations in that area is overly pessimistic, but I
could be wrong. Maybe you can verify this?
Actually the German Federal
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 04:16:01AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
On 10/19/2011 09:30 PM, Peter Lebbing wrote:
However, I think you're not ambitious enough when you opt for using DNS for
key
distribution. Yes, the infrastructure and RR types[1] are already there.
But it
brings this
On 20-10-2011 22:25, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
What about making everyone their own provider?
Is that technically equivalent to running your own mailserver? Because
that also gives some problems: I run my own server at vulcan.xs4all.nl
(bsmtp at a subdomain of my provider) but get some
Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
What about making everyone their own provider? The efforts in this
direction intiated by Eben Moglen that lead to the FreedomBox and other
projects seem to go in the right direction. It doesn't seem to me less
realistic than requiring cooperation from
Le 21/10/2011 16:12, Jean-David Beyer a écrit :
Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
What about making everyone their own provider? The efforts in this
direction intiated by Eben Moglen that lead to the FreedomBox and other
projects seem to go in the right direction. It doesn't seem to me less
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Thursday 20 October 2011 at 10:04:15 AM, in
mid:87hb34xcds@vigenere.g10code.de, Werner Koch wrote:
Most users don't have personal web pages. So what now?
Well many users have a facebook page - but this would
make facebook mandatory
