Re: Testing GPG EMail encryption

2012-05-24 Thread Mika Suomalainen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 23.05.2012 18:57, Brad Rogers wrote: On Wed, 23 May 2012 12:30:54 +0300 Mika Suomalainen mika.henrik.mai...@hotmail.com wrote: Hello Mika, I cannot verify your signature, because you use PGP/MIME and this mailing list uses mailing list

Re: Draft of nine new FAQ questions

2012-05-24 Thread Werner Koch
On Wed, 23 May 2012 23:40, ds...@jabberwocky.com said: Excellent. One note on the new text - it states that 2048-bit DSA keys use a 224-bit hash. In fact, a 2048-bit DSA key can use either 224 or 256-bit hashes. GnuPG uses 256 here (but will of course accept For the records: Before 2.0.13,

Scripts

2012-05-24 Thread Rob
Hello, Does anyone here consider himself/herself an expert at writing CMD scripts for use with/by GPG? I ask because I have a problem with such a script and I'm seeking help or advice. Rob ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org

Re: Testing GPG EMail encryption AKA PGP/MIME

2012-05-24 Thread Werner Koch
On Wed, 23 May 2012 18:17, da...@gbenet.com said: I've had your key for ages - so why not attach it? Sorry, I don't understand. You want my key? Look into the OpenPGP mail header or simply use a keyserver. Shalom-Salam, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein

Re: Draft of nine new FAQ questions

2012-05-24 Thread Werner Koch
On Thu, 24 May 2012 01:03, mailinglis...@hauke-laging.de said: That sounds like there has never been a security problem. El-Gamal signatures, anyone? Right, there was a bug in the Elgamal signature code. However this was a regression long after we changed the default to DSA with version

Re: Draft of nine new FAQ questions

2012-05-24 Thread Rupali Chitre
Hello,   I want to opt out from emails. I don't see unsubscribe option. How can I opt out?   Thanks, Rupali --- On Thu, 5/24/12, Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org wrote: From: Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org Subject: Re: Draft of nine new FAQ questions To: Hauke Laging mailinglis...@hauke-laging.de Cc:

Re: Testing GPG EMail encryption

2012-05-24 Thread Mark H. Wood
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 09:39:04PM +0100, da...@gbenet.com wrote: I ran the debugging programme with Openpgp debugging options to console and I got the message that with gpg2 installed one was not able to digitally sign an e-mail whilst encrypting to their public key which in all the named

Re: Draft of nine new FAQ questions

2012-05-24 Thread Werner Koch
On Thu, 24 May 2012 13:13, rychi...@yahoo.com said: I want to opt out from emails. I don't see unsubscribe option. How can I opt out? Have a look at the last line of each mail: http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users Or look into the mail headers. Salam-Shalom, Werner

Re: Scripts

2012-05-24 Thread Tanguy Herrmann
Hello, I'm interested in it too. I know GPG gives a lot of readable output, so I guess I must take only the return value of the gpg executable, right ? But for example, I don't know how to display only the fingerprint of a key without all the display around that I must grep/cut/sed away. But

Re: Testing GPG EMail encryption

2012-05-24 Thread Robert J. Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 5/24/12 3:09 AM, Mika Suomalainen wrote: At least Enigmail fails to recognize PGP/MIME signatures on some mailman mailing lists. Every time this has been reported to us, it has turned out to be a bug in Mailman and not Enigmail. If you can

Re: Testing GPG EMail encryption

2012-05-24 Thread Brad Rogers
On Thu, 24 May 2012 10:09:05 +0300 Mika Suomalainen mika.henrik.mai...@hotmail.com wrote: Hello Mika, At least Enigmail fails to recognize PGP/MIME signatures on some mailman mailing lists. That would explain the difference in what you and I see; No enigmail here. -- Regards _ /

Re: Scripts

2012-05-24 Thread Werner Koch
On Thu, 24 May 2012 14:04, tanguy.herrm...@gmail.com said: But for example, I don't know how to display only the fingerprint of a key without all the display around that I must grep/cut/sed away. But maybe I $ gpg --fingerprint --with-colons 1e42b367 | awk -F: '$1==fpr {print $10}'

Re: Testing GPG EMail encryption

2012-05-24 Thread da...@gbenet.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 24/05/12 13:55, Mark H. Wood wrote: On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 09:39:04PM +0100, da...@gbenet.com wrote: I ran the debugging programme with Openpgp debugging options to console and I got the message that with gpg2 installed one was not able to

Re: Testing GPG EMail encryption

2012-05-24 Thread Werner Koch
Hi David, your mails are hard to read because you do not trim the quotes and use lines of 90 characters or longer. Please don't use more than about 72. One hint anyway: GNOME has a thing called gnome-keyring which hijacks the gpg-agent IPC and thus you run into problems when using GnuPG-2. It

Re: Testing GPG EMail encryption

2012-05-24 Thread michael crane
mwood@mhw ~ $ dir /usr/bin/gpg* ^^^ -- keyID: 0x4BFEBB31 ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: Testing GPG EMail encryption

2012-05-24 Thread da...@gbenet.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 24/05/12 19:48, Werner Koch wrote: Hi David, your mails are hard to read because you do not trim the quotes and use lines of 90 characters or longer. Please don't use more than about 72. One hint anyway: GNOME has a thing called

Unsubscribing (was Re: Draft of nine new FAQ questions)

2012-05-24 Thread John Clizbe
Rupali Chitre wrote: Hello, I want to opt out from emails. I don't see unsubscribe option. How can I opt out? ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users Visit the link above -

Re: Draft of nine new FAQ questions

2012-05-24 Thread reynt0
On Wed, 23 May 2012, Robert J. Hansen wrote: On 5/23/12 6:50 PM, reynt0 wrote: Also, just to mention, best to avoid smart apostrophes/quotes in the final version, naturally, right? Not a whelk’s chance in a supernova. Those aren’t smart quotes, they’re perfectly valid UTF-8 typographic

Re: Draft of nine new FAQ questions

2012-05-24 Thread Robert J. Hansen
On 5/24/12 7:56 PM, reynt0 wrote: I was just guessing what they might be. They showed as garbage character groups in some browser rendering. They may render as 'no such glyph', depending on which font you use. I'd suggest using a better font. :) Also, if your browser is set to render

PGP interoperability

2012-05-24 Thread Robert J. Hansen
Looking over the PGP product offerings after their acquisition by Symantec, it seems they have dropped support for 2048- and 3072-bit DSA. This decision makes no sense to me, and is sufficiently weird that I wonder if the marketing copy is horribly in error. However, the marketing copy is clear