Re: Confusion with signature digest type.

2013-05-02 Thread Werner Koch
On Thu, 2 May 2013 06:48, r...@sixdemonbag.org said: thinking of these problems, and if-and-when Werner and g10 Code decide to shift the default behaviors I'm certain it will be towards a stronger hash algorithm. We always tried to make sure that new algorithms are deployed for a long time

FW: gpgee operation failed

2013-05-02 Thread 儒風管理部-潘右文
Hi, Peter. Thanks for help. I definitely will try your method next time because my colleague do the PC recovery into earlier date. Then, everyrhing goes back to normal. It used to work without signing the identity of public key though.Right now, I have no PC to try it out until next error

Re: [Announce] GPA 0.9.4 released

2013-05-02 Thread Richard Outerbridge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- w - does the new GPA work with win7-64? or are you still waiting 4funding? On 2013-05-01 (121), at 06:18:43, Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org wrote: __outer -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: 10.3.0.8741

Re: [Announce] GPA 0.9.4 released

2013-05-02 Thread Werner Koch
On Thu, 2 May 2013 00:56, ou...@interlog.com said: w - does the new GPA work with win7-64? Sure it has always worked with it. What does not work with 64 bit versions of Windows is GpgOL (Outlook plugin) [1] and GpgEX (Explorer plugin). If you encountered a problem with GPA in the 1.1.1-beta

Re: 2.0.20 beta available

2013-05-02 Thread Abel Luck
Is it planned to support --delete-secret-keys? ~abel Werner Koch: Hi, it is now more than a year since we released 2.0.19. Thus it is really time to get 2.0.20 out of the door. If you want to quickly try a beta you may use:

Re: 2.0.20 beta available

2013-05-02 Thread Pete Stephenson
On 5/2/2013 8:06 PM, Abel Luck wrote: Is it planned to support --delete-secret-keys? Do existing versions not support --delete-secret-keys? I've been using 2.0.17 and 2.0.19 on both Linux and Windows and have had no issues with --delete-secret-keys. It seems to have worked for me: I moved

determine encryption key without trying to decrypt

2013-05-02 Thread Hauke Laging
Hello, how can I determine the key(s) for which a file has been encrypted without gpg trying to decrypt the file? I don't understand why --list-packets tries to decrypt it anyway. --batch and --no-tty do not solve the problem. I don't consider my two ideas very elegant: 1) Call gpg --status-fd

Re: determine encryption key without trying to decrypt

2013-05-02 Thread Hauke Laging
Am Do 02.05.2013, 23:46:41 schrieb Kristian Fiskerstrand: how can I determine the key(s) for which a file has been encrypted without gpg trying to decrypt the file? Try --list-only Yeah, that's it. Still dark corners in man gpg I am unfamiliar with... And what a response time,

Re: determine encryption key without trying to decrypt

2013-05-02 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 05/02/2013 11:41 PM, Hauke Laging wrote: Hello, how can I determine the key(s) for which a file has been encrypted without gpg trying to decrypt the file? Hi Hauke, Try --list-only - -- - Kristian