Re: Building Pinentry for Windows

2013-10-25 Thread Andre Heinecke
Hi, On Thursday 24 October 2013 20:49:09 Nikola Radovanovic wrote: 1) When trying to build whole Gpg4Win i ran into several problems. Package for gtkhtmlviewer2 couldn't be found, but i have resolved it. This archive is now moved to plugins_obsolete folder (instead plugins) on a target url.

Re: 2048 or 4096 for new keys? aka defaults vs. Debian

2013-10-25 Thread Heinz Diehl
On 25.10.2013, Sylvain wrote: Is this zealotry on the Debian front, or something to update in gnupg? It's a matter of taste, and there are arguments both for and against. In my case, having a 4096 bit key has no major drawbacks, so I'm using one. If you trust gpg, you can safely trust the

Re: Building Pinentry for Windows

2013-10-25 Thread Werner Koch
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 13:53, nikola.radovano...@seavus.com said: Right now, by building the whole gpg4win i have succeeded in what i wanted, but i will certainly try again with MXE to see what is the problem there. I am glad to hear that. I will add some more tests to the installer. Just for

Re: none

2013-10-25 Thread Werner Koch
On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 20:49, nikola.radovano...@seavus.com said: 1) When trying to build whole Gpg4Win i ran into several problems. Package for gtkhtmlviewer2 couldn't be found, but i have Unfortunately this kind of problems happen from time to time. You may delete the claws-mail tar package

Re: trust your corporation for keyowner identification?

2013-10-25 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 13-10-22 04:57 PM, MFPA wrote: Hi Hi, It appears you probably meant the communication with bob@corporate.domain was the out-of-band channel by which you and Bob told each other your OpenPGP key fingerprints, and that being able to send emails from those corporate accounts also doubled as

Re: 2048 or 4096 for new keys? aka defaults vs. Debian

2013-10-25 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 21:05 +0200, Sylvain wrote: Is this zealotry on the Debian front, or something to update in gnupg? As they write,... they don't see a specific (i.e. technical or performance) reason not to do so. Some people may argue that 2048 is secure enough for many many years to come.

RE: (GnuPG) 1.4.2 - Signature Verification Issue

2013-10-25 Thread VINEETA DESHMUKH (CRGL-THIRDPARTY.COM)
Hi David, Thank you for your prompt response. The files which are sent by JP Morgan are using ascii mode of transfer and the files are ascii armored as well. Let me know if you have any other questions. Thanks, Vineeta -Original Message- From: David Shaw [mailto:ds...@jabberwocky.com]

RE: Building Pinentry for Windows

2013-10-25 Thread Nikola Radovanovic
Hello, Thanks for reply. I have did all that you wrote in the previous mail. I have dropped the pinentry.mk that you attached in the email to the mxe/src folder, but it won't work. But, just some moments ago i have successfully built the whole Gpg4Win :), by following the instructions from

Re: 2048 or 4096 for new keys? aka defaults vs. Debian

2013-10-25 Thread Pete Stephenson
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Christoph Anton Mitterer christoph.anton.mitte...@lmu.de wrote: On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 21:05 +0200, Sylvain wrote: Is this zealotry on the Debian front, or something to update in gnupg? As they write,... they don't see a specific (i.e. technical or performance)

Re: 2048 or 4096 for new keys? aka defaults vs. Debian

2013-10-25 Thread Johan Wevers
On 25-10-2013 1:46, Robert J. Hansen wrote: Mostly zealotry. According to NIST, RSA-2048 is expected to be secure for about the next 25 years. The authority of NIST is of course severely reduced since the Snowden revelations and their own suspicious behaviour with the Dual EC PRNG. Further,

Re: 2048 or 4096 for new keys? aka defaults vs. Debian

2013-10-25 Thread Paul R. Ramer
Johan Wevers joh...@vulcan.xs4all.nl wrote: On 25-10-2013 1:46, Robert J. Hansen wrote: Mostly zealotry. According to NIST, RSA-2048 is expected to be secure for about the next 25 years. The authority of NIST is of course severely reduced since the Snowden revelations and their own suspicious

Re: 2048 or 4096 for new keys? aka defaults vs. Debian

2013-10-25 Thread Paul R. Ramer
On 10/24/2013 04:46 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote: Is this zealotry on the Debian front, or something to update in gnupg? Mostly zealotry. According to NIST, RSA-2048 is expected to be secure for about the next 25 years. To add further to this, the U.S. military uses 2048 bit RSA keys for