-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi!
[This was originally planed as an open letter, but I thought it might
be better to hear your arguments beforehand.]
We think gnupg still is the most used and most important encryption tool
in the Free Software community. [1] But there is a big
Hello!
The GNU project is pleased to announce the availability of Libgcrypt
version 1.6.0. This is the new stable version of Libgcrypt with the API
being mostly compatible to previous versions. Due to the removal of
certain long deprecated functions this version introduces an ABI change.
On 12/14/2013 09:32 AM, Sam Tuke wrote:
This has been on the todo list for a while (the blog is all static hand
written HTML at the moment). I made separate pages as requested just now and
they're online. Should make linking easier (just click on the article headings
on the blog front page).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16/12/13 18:49, Werner Koch wrote:
* Added support for Deterministic DSA as per RFC-6969.
I think this is a typo and you mean RFC-6979 Deterministic Usage of the
Digital Signature Algorithm (DSA) and Elliptic Curve Digital Signature
Algorithm
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 18:37, adrela...@riseup.net said:
[This was originally planed as an open letter, but I thought it might
be better to hear your arguments beforehand.]
May I suggest to read the archives of just a few weeks to collect the
reasons why suggestions of using SHA-512 are missing
We think...
If you're writing on behalf of a group, I would love to know the name
of the group and the names of its members. Otherwise, I can only
assume you are suffering a mental illness and are speaking for the
multiple voices in your head -- either that or else perhaps you're
On 12/16/2013 02:32 PM, Micah Lee wrote:
Also, looks like the CA is CAcert--an awesome CA, but not trusted by
browsers by default. I'd suggest getting a cert from StartSSL
[https://startssl.com/], since they're they only CA that gives certs for
free. And a wildcard cert (for *.gnupg.org) ends
for well-known free software projects (Also, as a business in Israel,
StartSSL is the target of an ongoing international boycott due to
Israeli domestic policy -- http://www.bdsmovement.net/).
Although I support each person's right to believe what they want with
respect to Israeli domestic
On 12/15/2013 04:58 AM, Peter Lebbing wrote:
On 14/12/13 21:14, Leo Gaspard wrote:
Maybe if you explained what the limitations of are...?
My guess is the fact that only supports secrets up to 1024 bits; if you
want to share a larger secret you need to do a hybrid approach where you
Werner Koch:
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 18:37, adrela...@riseup.net said:
[This was originally planed as an open letter, but I thought it might
be better to hear your arguments beforehand.]
May I suggest to read the archives of just a few weeks to collect the
reasons why suggestions of using
Robert J. Hansen: We think...
If you're writing on behalf of a group, I would love to know the name of
the group and the names of its members.
Understandable. At the moment it's just one person sharing that opinion.
[Didn't ask many more yet.] I asked if I am allowed to tell names,
probably
On 12/16/2013 6:11 PM, adrelanos wrote:
When I searched for this on search engines, I haven't found one in a
project's character. (I.e. were it's open for debate/pull
requests/changes.)
Perhaps not, but you *did* find them. Your original email referenced,
for instance, the Debian GnuPG
On 12/16/2013 12:35 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
Regardless of how you feel about the CA cartel in general, StartSSL is
not the only member of the cartel offering gratis certs, particularly
for well-known free software projects
Oh interesting, I didn't realize there were other CAs that give
this looks like a significant upgrade
if i have already compiled gnupg 2.x with libgcrypt 1.5.3, and i want to
use the new 1.6.0, do i need to uninstall gnupg libcrypt and then
compile both again together, and re-install ?
gnupg 2.x would not work with the new libgcrypt if i just install it
14 matches
Mail list logo
