Hey all,
Does anyone know if there is any chance of using an OpenPGP smart card for
Java? I know that GnuPG doesn't support PKCS#11, but I was wondering if
things work the otherway around: java using the OpenPGP card. It would be
super useful to be able to use the same smartcard for both
Il 07/01/2014 04:01, Hans-Christoph Steiner ha scritto:
Does anyone know if there is any chance of using an OpenPGP smart card for
Java? I know that GnuPG doesn't support PKCS#11, but I was wondering if
things work the otherway around: java using the OpenPGP card. It would be
super useful
NdK wrote:
Il 07/01/2014 04:01, Hans-Christoph Steiner ha scritto:
Does anyone know if there is any chance of using an OpenPGP smart card for
Java? I know that GnuPG doesn't support PKCS#11, but I was wondering if
things work the otherway around: java using the OpenPGP card. It would be
Dear Werner,
Thank you for your kind reply.
On 06/01/2014, Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org wrote:
The question is whether this is really helpful. Yes, it protects your
PIN
That is helpful. No question about this part!
After a successful verification of the PIN the card allows the use of
the
On Tue, 7 Jan 2014 16:28, sam.ku...@uclmail.net said:
PSO:DEC but does not define it. That document also mentions
PSO:DECRYPT but does not define it. And finally, that document
defines PSO: DECIPHER. Are these three terms synonyms, or do they
I guess so.
2. I assume that your PSO Decrypt
On 07/01/14 17:27, Werner Koch wrote:
See the card HOWTO or try gpg --card-edit, admin, help.
Additionally, in the OpenPGP Card 2.0.1 spec, the DO with tag C4 on page 17,
section 7.2.2 (VERIFY) and section 7.2.8 (PSO: COMPUTE DIGITAL SIGNATURE) all
specify this one-VERIFY-per-SIG behaviour.
On 01/07/2014 09:32 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
NdK wrote:
Il 07/01/2014 04:01, Hans-Christoph Steiner ha scritto:
Does anyone know if there is any chance of using an OpenPGP smart card for
Java? I know that GnuPG doesn't support PKCS#11, but I was wondering if
things work the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Monday 6 January 2014 at 2:24:10 AM, in
mid:7677715.1slnlpw...@inno.berlin.laging.de, Hauke Laging wrote:
That is correct. I am not aware of a possibility to get
the data and the signature from GnuPG. But that doesn't
mean it's not