Re: Download of public keys

2017-02-17 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 02/17/2017 09:46 PM, si...@web.de wrote: > Am 17.02.2017 um 20:43 schrieb Kristian Fiskerstrand: >> On 02/17/2017 07:17 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: >> >> That change would also be consistent with >>

Re: Download of public keys

2017-02-17 Thread sivmu
Am 17.02.2017 um 20:43 schrieb Kristian Fiskerstrand: > On 02/17/2017 07:17 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: >> On 02/17/2017 07:00 PM, si...@web.de wrote: >>> keyserver hkps://jirk5u4osbsr34t5.onion >>> keyserver hkps://keys.gnupg.net >>> >>> would solve this I guess. >> >> No, that'd result in

Re: GPG homedir path length limit

2017-02-17 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Fri 2017-02-17 04:42:14 -0500, Justus Winter wrote: > Well, I tested it on all systems I had access to at that time. I could > have written a small test program, and asked people to run it on systems > we don't have access to. But we never got to that point :( That would be a way to advance

Re: powertop(8) Points at gpg-agent.

2017-02-17 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Fri 2017-02-17 08:59:52 -0500, Ralph Corderoy wrote: > There's a few relevant patches by Daniel Kahn Gillmor, e.g. cancelling > the socket check if inotify(7) can be used. > https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2016-November/032012.html We're shipping these patches in debian testing

Re: Download of public keys

2017-02-17 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 02/17/2017 07:17 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 02/17/2017 07:00 PM, si...@web.de wrote: >> keyserver hkps://jirk5u4osbsr34t5.onion >> keyserver hkps://keys.gnupg.net >> >> would solve this I guess. > > No, that'd result in certificate errors and non-responsive servers > That said,

Re: Download of public keys

2017-02-17 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 02/17/2017 07:00 PM, si...@web.de wrote: > keyserver hkps://jirk5u4osbsr34t5.onion > keyserver hkps://keys.gnupg.net > > would solve this I guess. No, that'd result in certificate errors and non-responsive servers -- Kristian Fiskerstrand Blog:

Re: Download of public keys

2017-02-17 Thread sivmu
Am 17.02.2017 um 17:31 schrieb Kristian Fiskerstrand: > On 02/17/2017 01:37 PM, si...@web.de wrote: >> Is there something I missed or is this unintended? > > gnupg does not ship an installed dirmngr.conf, when no keyserver is > specified it defaults to hkps://hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net, the >

Re: Download of public keys

2017-02-17 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 02/17/2017 01:37 PM, si...@web.de wrote: > Is there something I missed or is this unintended? gnupg does not ship an installed dirmngr.conf, when no keyserver is specified it defaults to hkps://hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net, the existence of a (I presume) arch installed dirmngr.conf changes

Re: GPG, subkeys smartcard and computer

2017-02-17 Thread Andrew Gallagher
Stefano, I meant to reply last night, but didn't fancy writing this out on a phone keyboard. No need to resend questions - this tends to be a high-latency list for people in odd time zones, working from home, on the move etc. NB all the below is IMHO, YMMV etc. :-D On 16/02/17 15:04, Stefano

powertop(8) Points at gpg-agent.

2017-02-17 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi, gnupg 2.1.18-1 on Arch Linux. I noticed powertop ranking the gpg-agents, one per user, quite highly, and their impact is multiplied by their number. strace(1) showed the two-second select(2) timing out with no syscalls in between, and the forking of two siblings to have a `GETINFO pid' chat

GPG, subkeys smartcard and computer

2017-02-17 Thread Stefano Tranquillini
Hi all, I'm sort of new to GPG/PGP, I'm not new to the encryption/crypto world and to computers, however, some concepts are yet not clear to me. I can't get my head around on how to use GPG in the "correct" way to guarantee the maximum result. That is: protect, at the best, my privacy and also

Download of public keys

2017-02-17 Thread sivmu
Some time ago I asked about the unencrypted download of public keys. The answer was that the current gnupg does use https by default to fetch the keys. I found the time to retest this on a new setup and found that gnupg 2.1.18 still uses http connections to fetch the keys. I uses a newly

Re: GPG homedir path length limit

2017-02-17 Thread Justus Winter
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes: > On Thu 2017-02-16 04:12:36 -0500, Justus Winter wrote: >> That is still wrong. The length of the path of the socket is not >> limited in any way, the length of the path passed to connect is. > > this is a clever approach to *connect* to such