On 2017-03-03 at 09:51 +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
> Not cleaning expired subkeys is a good thing for secret key export, so
> that you can keep on decyrpting old mails.
Sure, but this is a non-secret export, for the versions for publication.
> Exporting
Anyone have any thoughts on this?
On 2/27/17, 9:20 AM, "Gnupg-users on behalf of Jeffrey Stedfast"
wrote:
Hi all,
I'm working on re-implementing GMime to use libgpgme (1.8.0 on Fedora 25)
instead of using my
On 03/03/2017 06:04 PM, Gerd v. Egidy wrote:
> When reading the gpg2 manpage on return codes:
One quick observation, if using this in automated way and return code
matters, you likely want to check out "gpgv", otherwise you should be
parsing --status-fd output for more details
--
On Wednesday, 01 March 2017 20:27:00 CET Werner Koch wrote:
> Noteworthy changes in version 2.1.19
>
>
> ..
>
> * scd: Support for multiple card readers.
>
> * scd: Improved detection of card inserting and removal.
thanks for the new release!
The support
Hi Kristian,
On Friday, 03 March 2017 18:11:04 CET Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 03/03/2017 06:04 PM, Gerd v. Egidy wrote:
> > When reading the gpg2 manpage on return codes:
> One quick observation, if using this in automated way and return code
> matters, you likely want to check out
On Tuesday, 28 February 2017 00:28:21 CET NIIBE Yutaka wrote:
> Anyhow, it would be possible for Gnuk to add U2F support (somehow
> limited, because of available resource on board).
regarding limited resources, the Yubikey people did a fine trick:
There is no per-website data stored on the
Hi Robert,
> > I think it should return 1 in this case. But I get 2. Why?
>
> Because there were no bad signatures. A signature which cannot be
> verified is neither good nor bad, it just is.
ok.
> The alternative would be for GnuPG to return a bad signature literally
> *whenever* it had no
> I think it should return 1 in this case. But I get 2. Why?
Because there were no bad signatures. A signature which cannot be
verified is neither good nor bad, it just is.
The alternative would be for GnuPG to return a bad signature literally
*whenever* it had no public key with which to
Hi,
I have a scenario where a signature on a file should be checked. The file is
signed by several keys and for this scenario it is ok if at least one is
correct. In some cases it can happen that the system doing the check does not
have access to all public keys that are used for signing.
When
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 21:03, ankos...@gmail.com said:
> Would it be possible with the next release to build also the python-2
> & 3 bindings for Windows?
Good suggestion - we will look into it.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
On Fri, 3 Mar 2017 07:21, gnupg-us...@spodhuis.org said:
> Why is `export-clean` not dropping the expired subkey? Is it that
> export-clean only filters unusable userids, not unusable subkeys?
Right:
/* Always do the cleaning on the public key part if requested.
* Note that both
11 matches
Mail list logo