Re: Automating and integrating GPG

On 09/19/2017 03:53 PM, Andreas Heinlein wrote: > Handling of the passphrase is about one of the most sensitive > tasks when dealing with encryption. I currently can think of no way you > could handle passphrases on your own in python which I would call > 'secure'. In such a scenario I'd likely

Re: OT: Which smartphone would you use

On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 17:32:51 +0200, Thomas Hejze wrote: >Hello everyone, >I know this is off-topic, but since it is related to IT security and >therefore more or less to GNUPG, I hope that I get some helping >answers, though. > >Having been objecting to smartphones for a long time

[Announce] GnuPG 2.2.1 released

Hello! We are is pleased to announce the availability of a new GnuPG release: version 2.2.1. This is a maintenance release; see below for a list of fixed bugs. About GnuPG === The GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) is a complete and free implementation of the OpenPGP standard which is commonly

Re: using --keyserver but still getting gpg: no keyserver known (use option --keyserver)

On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 23:37, d...@fifthhorseman.net said: > modern versions of gpg should default to the hkps pool, and shouldn't > need any explicit configuration. Right, and it is also more future proof to use the keyserver option in dirmngr.conf instead of gpg.conf. But as you say, no