Re: Will gpg 1.x remain supported for the foreseeable future?

2018-01-20 Thread Dan Kegel
On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 4:08 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote: > I think that's https://dev.gnupg.org/T2290 Thanks. Say, anyone know how to get bug tracker problems resolved? Somehow my email address there lacks a dot before .com, so I can't get confirmation emails. - Dan

Re: Will gpg 1.x remain supported for the foreseeable future?

2018-01-20 Thread Todd Zullinger
Dan Kegel wrote: > - might save time and anguish if apt-key (and thus gpg[v]?) accepted > armored keyrings even if filename ends in .gpg I think that's https://dev.gnupg.org/T2290, in case you want to follow it or submit a patch to implement it. Werner did provide some details about how it would

Re: Will gpg 1.x remain supported for the foreseeable future?

2018-01-20 Thread Dan Kegel
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:58 PM, Dan Kegel wrote: >> The keys referred to via signed-by are the only acceptable keys for the >> associated apt repo. >> >> does that make sense? > > That'd be great if it worked. Since it's hard to explain what's broken > without a simple script

Re: SCM SPR332 PIN entry doesn't work

2018-01-20 Thread Maciej S. Szmigiero
On 14.01.2018 01:01, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote: > Hi all, > > I've just received a SCM SPR332 from FLOSS-Shop (marked as "SPR332 V2" > on its bottom side) and while its basic reader functionality seems to work > just fine I can't get the secure PIN entry mode to work at all. > > I've tried two

Re: gnupg-2.2.4: how to deal with failed tests

2018-01-20 Thread MFPA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Friday 19 January 2018 at 3:50:22 PM, in , Shannon Mess via Gnupg-users wrote:- > REMOVE my email address from this thread! You are subscribed to the mailing list or not subscribed to it.