On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 18:47:05 +0100, Stefan Claas wrote:
> > But i fail to see what any of this has to do with minors
> > specifically (surely the good guidance applies after reaching the
> > age of majority as well), or how law enforcement happened to sneak
> > in at the end there. I suspect
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 11:31:35 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Fri 2018-11-16 17:00:33 +0100, Stefan Claas wrote:
> > I understand your points, but like to point out my view of sig0
> > and why i think it is not good and why i wrote a policy that way.
>
> I think you're talking about this:
On Fri 2018-11-16 17:00:33 +0100, Stefan Claas wrote:
> I understand your points, but like to point out my view of sig0
> and why i think it is not good and why i wrote a policy that way.
I think you're talking about this:
> With the sig0 approach i have the following problem: I could create
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 08:03:09 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Thu 2018-11-15 23:41:32 +0100, Stefan Claas wrote:
> > or if i sign with sig0 a key on a key signing party, where i also
> > don't know that the person who attended is a good or bad person
>
> OpenPGP identity certifications
On Thu 2018-11-15 23:41:32 +0100, Stefan Claas wrote:
> or if i sign with sig0 a key on a key signing party, where i also don't
> know that the person who attended is a good or bad person
OpenPGP identity certifications ("keysignings") make no claims one way
or the other about a person's moral
On 16.11.2018 00:40, Dirk Gottschalk via Gnupg-users wrote:
> There's documentation about the trustdb. I read it a while ago, but not
> entirely. You can also set the amount of needed signatures for the
> trust calculations and so on. Then comes the trust deepness into play.
> I also have to read
