Re: Garbled data in keyservers

On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 18:34:49 +0100, Wiktor Kwapisiewicz wrote: > On 10.12.2018 17:32, Stefan Claas wrote: > > As per Werner's suggestion to make only the fingerprint available for > > (Web/API) searches, > > is also a thing, because like i previously said a list of fingerprints for > > example

Re: Garbled data in keyservers

On 10.12.2018 17:32, Stefan Claas wrote: > Yes, it seems it would be a good start. However, if unwanted data can then be > still > submitted remains to bee seen, because what if anonymous email services would > use > DKIM too? Well it depends on the implementation. In current keyserver model

Re: Garbled data in keyservers

On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 14:25:08 +0100, Wiktor Kwapisiewicz wrote: Hi Wiktor, > That's an interesting idea, it seems GnuPG has some support for sending keys > via > e-mail. > By the way validation of keys sent from e-mail would require DKIM as it's easy > to spoof "From" (that's why most

Re: Garbled data in keyservers

Hi, I use an address I control, but the email was not even sent so I guess the error happened before the key hit the network. Kind regards, Wiktor Dnia December 10, 2018 2:56:54 PM UTC, Damien Goutte-Gattat napisał(a): >On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 02:25:08PM +0100, Wiktor Kwapisiewicz via

Re: Garbled data in keyservers

On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 02:25:08PM +0100, Wiktor Kwapisiewicz via Gnupg-users wrote: > On 09.12.2018 20:48, Stefan Claas wrote: > > Mind you in the 90's PGP key servers accepted also email and Usenet > > submissions, if i remember correctly. The keyword was then simple > > the word "add" in the

Re: Garbled data in keyservers

On 09.12.2018 20:48, Stefan Claas wrote: > Mind you in the 90's PGP key servers accepted also email and Usenet > submissions, if i remember correctly. The keyword was then simple > the word "add" in the subject line of an email. > > That's an interesting