raf via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote:
>
> > Andrew Gallagher wrote:
> >
> > > * And finally: “don’t encrypt email”? Yes, well. Email is not going away.
> > > Just like passwords, its death has been long anticipated, yet never
> > > arrives. So what do we do in the
Thanks, that explains it.
And the faketime gpgsm command worked (after installing faketime).
But that's a hack, and users should not have to do this. Especially
since GnuPG 2.1 defauls to keybox and more people recommend it with of
the recent flooding issues.
I opened an issue to track
Hi,
I'm trying to switch to my third S/MIME cert after two earlier expired
ones in gpgsm. The private key and the certificate are valid into the
year 2022, but gpgsm (version 2.2.15) tells me this:
shell$ LANG=C gpgsm --sign -u 0x310C60AF
[…]
gpgsm: certificate is good
gpgsm: intermediate
> On 18 Jul 2019, at 17:46, Todd Fleisher wrote:
>
> "Unfortunately, there is currently no
> good way to distribute revocations that doesn't also reveal the revoked
> identity itself. We don't want to distribute revoked identities, so we can't
> distribute the identity at all."
We can kill two
On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 23:41, i...@zeromail.org said:
> But the keybox file didn't get any smaller:
Good catch. In gpg we have not implenteted the compression run:
/* FIXME: Do a compress run if needed and no other
user is currently using the keybox. */
However, in gpgsm this is
On 07/18/2019 04:21 AM, U'll Be King of the Stars wrote:
> On 18/07/2019 05:40, Mirimir via Gnupg-users wrote:
>> When I need to share stuff among GUI-less VPS, with no Javascript
>> capable browser, I sometimes use pastebins. I encrypt with GnuPG, and
>> then base64 encode.
>
> I love pastebins.
On 18/07/2019 05:40, Mirimir via Gnupg-users wrote:
When I need to share stuff among GUI-less VPS, with no Javascript
capable browser, I sometimes use pastebins. I encrypt with GnuPG, and
then base64 encode.
I love pastebins. I think they are an excellent "first serious web app"
type of
Hi all,
On 18.07.19 12:19, ilf wrote:
> Same on a different box with a different keyring. I trimmed it down from
> ~1250 keys to ~350 keys, but the size of pubring.kbx remains 19M.
>
> Does --delete really mean *delete* with keybox?
>
> ilf:
>> This got my keyring down from 4.600 to 1.000
