Re: gpg tells me a signature from my own key is a forgery.

2019-08-30 Thread Brian Minton
On 8/30/19 12:41 PM, Brian Minton wrote: > I am testing signing with multiple keys. However, gpg tells me that my > own key is a forgery. I know it is not a forgery because I didn't forge > it. Is there a way to tell gpg that my own key is good? I'm using > trust model tofu+pgp, and both of my

gpg tells me a signature from my own key is a forgery.

2019-08-30 Thread Brian Minton
I am testing signing with multiple keys. However, gpg tells me that my own key is a forgery. I know it is not a forgery because I didn't forge it. Is there a way to tell gpg that my own key is good? I'm using trust model tofu+pgp, and both of my keys are cross-signed and set to ultimate trust.

Re: What is the practical strength of DSA1024/Elgamal2048 (former GnuPG default)?

2019-08-30 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 30.08.2019 01:02, Brian Minton wrote: > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 11:19:15AM +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: >> On 4/25/19 9:20 AM, Bernhard Reiter wrote: >>> Wikipedia points out a strong sensitivity of the algorithm to the quality >>> of >>> random number generators and that

Re: What is the practical strength of DSA1024/Elgamal2048 (former GnuPG default)?

2019-08-30 Thread Brian Minton
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 11:19:15AM +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 4/25/19 9:20 AM, Bernhard Reiter wrote: > > Wikipedia points out a strong sensitivity of the algorithm to the quality > > of > > random number generators and that implementations could deliberately leak > > information