Re: add-photo continued ...

2019-09-04 Thread raf via Gnupg-users
Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote: > Hi all, > > some of you may remember the add-photo thread we had a while ago > and I wondered why the max image size for a UAT packet is 16 MB. > > Recently I saw a Twitter post explaining that a .jpeg image header > can contain 16 MB of data. That's just

Re: add-photo continued ...

2019-09-04 Thread Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users
Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote: > Recently I saw a Twitter post explaining that a .jpeg image header > can contain 16 MB of data. I do not have the link currently handy, > sorry! I think I talked nonsense here about the 16 MB header size! Hopefully I can find the authors technique again,

Forward entire gnupg $HOME

2019-09-04 Thread Andre Klärner
Hi all, is there a way to properly shared the entire keyring and trust settings between two machines? My use case is the following: Mutt, my email client, runs on a containerized mailserver on another machine right under my desk. My GPG key is stored on a Yubikey attached to my workstation

add-photo continued ...

2019-09-04 Thread Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users
Hi all, some of you may remember the add-photo thread we had a while ago and I wondered why the max image size for a UAT packet is 16 MB. Recently I saw a Twitter post explaining that a .jpeg image header can contain 16 MB of data. I do not have the link currently handy, sorry! So here is a

Re: Fresh certificate marked as expired / messed-up certificate chain pulling expired root cert in gpgsm

2019-09-04 Thread Dr. Thomas Orgis
Am Tue, 30 Jul 2019 13:28:32 +0200 schrieb "Dr. Thomas Orgis" : > And even with it present, is it > correct behaviour for gpgsm to consider the chain invalid instead of > just the cross-signature? It _does_ trust the new root cert already … > no need for any further signature. Just now the third