> On 31. 5. 2021, at 12:30, Andreas Mattheiss
> wrote:
>
> I don't have any pinentry defined in any of my settings in .gnupg/ neither.
FYI for the archives, this was the problem. ~/.gnupg/gpg-agent.conf had the
following entry:
pinentry-program
Hello,
is there a reason why the new software distribution key for GnuPG (
0x528897B826403ADA ) comes with no chain of trust at all? It does not
have any signature from any preceding key.
Past distribution keys like 0x53B620D01CE0C630 had signatures from other
keys you might have trusted like
Hello!
I use Debian unstable+experimental. Debian unstable has gpg version 2.2.27,
while Debian experimental has gpg version 2.3.1. I'm using gpg mainly in the
context of pass (https://passwordstore.org), but also for encrypting files and
such. Additionally, I use ProtonMail, and I have the
> On 31. 5. 2021, at 12:30, Andreas Mattheiss
> wrote:
>
> Am Mon, 31 May 2021 07:59:35 +0200 schrieb Christopher Richardson via
> Gnupg-users:
>
>> This is probably something very trivial, but Im building gpg for the
>> first time since, apparently, 2013, according to my old binary. The
I tried the same sequence on the same host A but for new test user with
clean ~/.gnupg without success. Could you help me to debug this, please.
--
sergio.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Hello,
Am Mon, 31 May 2021 07:59:35 +0200 schrieb Christopher Richardson via
Gnupg-users:
> This is probably something very trivial, but Im building gpg for the
> first time since, apparently, 2013, according to my old binary. The build
> seems fine, but ...
>
a bit of a longshot, but if your
This is probably something very trivial, but I’m building gpg for the first
time since, apparently, 2013, according to my old binary. The build seems
fine, but ...
cwr@cwr2019mbp passwds % gpg --decrypt personal.gpg
gpg: encrypted with elg2048 key, ID 4CDB599A36DD7843, created 2000-07-26
