Re: gpg: keyserver receive failed: No name - for gpg --keyserver hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net

On 24/06/2021 22:39, Brandon Anderson via Gnupg-users wrote: $ host pool.sks-keyservers.net Host pool.sks-keyservers.net not found: 3(NXDOMAIN) Did these names get permanently deleted? Any workarounds or suggestions would

Re: gpg: keyserver receive failed: No name - for gpg --keyserver hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net

The keyserver situation seems a bit difficult currently, maybe https://keys.openpgp.org/ is the best (easiest) workaround for now. But WKD is really worth looking at! My understanding is the Ubuntu Key-server is staying up, I could be wrong, but https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/ seems to be

Re: gpg: keyserver receive failed: No name - for gpg --keyserver hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net

Am 24.06.21 um 19:19 schrieb Alexander Polcyn via Gnupg-users: > () > Host ipv4.pool.sks-keyservers.net > not found: 3(NXDOMAIN) > () > Did these names get permanently deleted? Any workarounds or suggestions > would be appreciated. One alternative

Re: gpg: keyserver receive failed: No name - for gpg --keyserver hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net

Starting on the morning of June 21 between ~6am and 9am PDT, one of our CI jobs which fetches gpg keys with: gpg --keyserver hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys ... started failing because of what looks like a failure to resolve the pool name.

gpg: keyserver receive failed: No name - for gpg --keyserver hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net

Starting on the morning of June 21 between ~6am and 9am PDT, one of our CI jobs which fetches gpg keys with: gpg --keyserver hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys ... started failing because of what looks like a failure to resolve the pool name. FWIW the following also fails in the

GPGME Cannot allocate memory on gpgme_op_decrypt_start

Hi all. I'm having this problem with code that would like to decrypt a large gpg file (252 MB) which is password protected! I set the environment which works whit smaller files but in this case I face 117473366 --> Cannot allocate memory Is there any option that I can set to use something

Re: Detaching signature from signed object

On Wed, 23 Jun 2021 17:55, Matthew Richardson said: > provide enough inforation to extract the signature? Does it vary depending > upon whether the signature is ASCII armored? Actually gpgsplit can be used to slit an OpenPGP message. In theory it is possible to convert an encrypted and signed

Re: Command line decryption/encryption

On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 09:41, john doe said: > The executable is in the subdirectory 'bin' as 'gpg.exe'. Which is usuallay part of the PATH. > A better idea is to use a file that contains the passthrase if you need > to automate d/encryption or to use the agent. An even better idea is not to use

Re: Long Term Key Management With Hardware Tokens

On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 02:21, Brandon Anderson said: > First, if you are working on a new revision of the OpenPGP card, > please let me know if I can reasonably do anything to help. While I Thanks for your offer. However, it is mainly a spec and hardware thing and the software part is minor. If

Re: Long Term Key Management With Hardware Tokens

I am not arguing that paper copies are less reliable; of course, they are; however, they are not as secure. As I reread this email, I realized what I said here may have been unclear. I meant to say, of course, paper copies are more reliable than hardware tokens; they are just less secure.

Re: Long Term Key Management With Hardware Tokens

concerned, you could use three. The probability that one card out of ten will have a failure in a decade is far higher than the chance that You should also be concerned that malware bricks your (backup) card. You can only avoid that by using an always air-gaped box which is pretty

Re: Command line decryption/encryption

On 6/23/2021 3:31 PM, Terry Pierce wrote: Hi, Let me start off with I am totally new to GPG/Kleopatra. We use different encryption tools here and one of our clients uses GPG. I have already automated the processing of files using our tool and now have a need to build in a call to handle

Re: SHA Hash for DMG

On Donnerstag, 24. Juni 2021 00:14:19 CEST Wayne Ho via Gnupg-users wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering if anyone knows that SHA1 checksum for the MacOS file > GnuPG-2.2.28.dmg. It seems to be missing from > https://www.gnupg.org/download/integrity_check.html. It's not missing. The MacOS installer