Re: GnuPG 2.2.36 released

2022-07-13 Thread Michael Richardson
Todd Zullinger via Gnupg-users wrote: > It's frustrating that the releases are signed with a cipher that cannot > be verified on a reasonably popular distro. At least, multiple signatures could be made. -- Michael Richardson. o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman

Re: GnuPG 2.2.36 released

2022-07-13 Thread Konstantin Ryabitsev via Gnupg-users
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 09:22:36AM -0400, Todd Zullinger via Gnupg-users wrote: > > Maybe it helps to report the problem of missing crypto algorithms to your > > GNU/Linux distribution. > > They aren't really missing but rather intentionally removed > due to legal issues on Fedora/Red Hat. This

Re: GnuPG 2.2.36 released

2022-07-13 Thread Todd Zullinger via Gnupg-users
Bernhard Reiter wrote: > Am Montag 11 Juli 2022 14:50:24 schrieb Konstantin Ryabitsev via Gnupg-users: >>> See https://dev.gnupg.org/T5949#159890 for why it doesn't work for you. >> >> Ah, okay, that's unfortunate. I guess I'll skip this release, since I can't >> verify it without building gnupg

Re: GnuPG 2.2.36 released

2022-07-13 Thread Bernhard Reiter
Hi Ralf, Am Donnerstag 07 Juli 2022 05:35:57 schrieb Ralph Seichter via Gnupg-users: > GnuPG for OS X / macOS version 2.2.36 is now available via the URL > https://sourceforge.net/projects/gpgosx/files/ . > > This is the first relase since Patrick Brunschwig passed stewardship of > the project to

Re: GnuPG 2.2.36 released

2022-07-13 Thread Bernhard Reiter
Am Montag 11 Juli 2022 14:50:24 schrieb Konstantin Ryabitsev via Gnupg-users: > > See https://dev.gnupg.org/T5949#159890 for why it doesn't work for you. > > Ah, okay, that's unfortunate. I guess I'll skip this release, since I can't > verify it without building gnupg from scratch (without