[I am resending from my list-subscribed email address.]
On 06/05/2019 11:17, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
> Another option is to buy a burner phone and SIM paying cash.
> I've seen both available in stores and supermarkets and street stands
> in at least 3 countries.
In which countries is this
Hello,
I am gradually getting back into using Alpine for the times I need to
work with email on an interactive TTY. I have written to the
Alpine-info list before, asking for recommendations for using OpenPGP
implementations, particularly GnuPG [1].
I received many useful responses. However I
On 27/03/2019 20:32, Eduardo Chappa wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Mar 2019, Andrew Luke Nesbit wrote:
>
>> I received many useful responses. However I would like to explore
>> options for native integration rather than using external filters.
>>
>> Does anybody know of an
Hey Arthur, what makes you think that Yubikey is trustworthy?
Is it because you have assessed your threat model and you disbelieve
that any potential attacks via Yubikey would be not used against you?
Or have you done an independent audit of the Yubikey and satisfied
yourself that it's safe
On 12/12/2018 21:43, Wiktor Kwapisiewicz wrote:
>> Should I issue and publish a revocation certificate? Will this cause
>> problems considering that I'm still using the same master key?
>
> I don't think revocation is necessary if the private subkeys are still safe.
Yes, they are still safe.
On 12/12/2018 09:15, Wiktor Kwapisiewicz via Gnupg-users wrote:
>> Coming soon to Fedora30 (rawhide), gnupg v1.4.x renamed to gnupg1. Also
>> dropping keyserver support at Werner's suggestion since upstream plans to
>> disable that soon.
>
> Source:
Please excuse any previous attempt at posting this, which was sent
"From: " the wrong address.
On 07/11/2018 20:50, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> GPGTools has some problems in that they can't see the source for
Mail.app, and as a result they've sometimes been slower to patch things
than Enigmail.
On 23/09/2018 21:19, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Sun 2018-09-23 18:18:13 +0200, Peter Lebbing wrote:
>> The intent of this mail is not to ask whether something works. This can
>> be easily verified. It's asking whether it is a supported way of doing
>> things. I hope I can get some guidance on
