Hello,
Please unsubscribe me from this list.
Chris
On 10/01/2022 15:08, gnupg-users-requ...@gnupg.org wrote:
Send Gnupg-users mailing list submissions to
gnupg-users@gnupg.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo
However, I would like to question your need for requiring two gpg keys.
How are they two gpg going to be more secure?
Guessing that possibly two different people need to be in agreement in
order to access data, along the lines of needing two keys to launch
missiles? :)
Otherwise, I agree
The hash of my gpg file on my laptop is different to it's hash on the
thumb drive. For comparison, the hash of the tar.gz file (i.e. before
encryption) is the same before and after I copy it to the thumb drive.
Are there any techniques I should be using to protect my gpg file?
Chris Taylor
onto other meda?
Chris.
On 29/10/2021 12:05, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
On 29 Oct 2021, at 10:17, Chris Taylor wrote:
I am developing a backup process for personal files, on USB thumb drive. I tar
and zip my files (30GB) then encrypt them with:
gpg --no-symkey-cache --symmetric --cipher
ING: encrypted message has been manipulated!
gpg: block_filter: pending bytes!
I have gpg version 2.2.19, libgcrypt 1.8.5. Without encryption this
process has worked perfectly well many times.
Any advice greatly appreciated.
Chris.
___
Gnupg-us
On Tue, 2021-03-02 at 10:35 +, Romain Lebrun Thauront via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I start using my gpg key as my ssh key and I configure gpg-agent to manage my
> ssh keys as mention in the arch wiki
> article.
> The problem is, it work well but my gpg-agent is now "link" to the
ild.opensuse.org/project/show/SUSE:SLE-15-SP2:GA
https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/SUSE:SLE-15-SP2:Update
I would try to get it from one of the original SLE repos, or ask on a
SUSE mailing list about why it's missing from SP1.
Cheers,
Chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
I wouldn't think you would want to be able to do that. If it can be done
without the private key, then I can revoke your key for you... :-)
-C
On 2/5/2020 3:59 PM, Mark wrote:
Is there anyway to revoke an OLD LOST PGP key? I no longer have either
the public or private keys but can find the
YubiKeys are supported. You can use NFC key to perform crypto gimmicks or plug
USB one.
OpenKeychain does support quite large palette of hardware tokens.
Paired with K-9 it actually provides relatively good UX.___
Gnupg-users mailing list
ously would be beneficial.
Should it be advertised as a new go-to standard or as
transitional standard, beta/alpha/whatever - I don't know,
it's debatable.
Cheers,
Chris
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On 12/10/2019 12:14, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
> After 20 years of strong resistance against implementing OpenPGP [1], they
> finally seem to do it. That is a good move.
Do you know why they resited OpenPGP adoption it so much?
Cheers,
n. You need to look at it from product/business
development perspective and it makes perfect sense that they want to
ship their own UX.
Also, they mention that the key management workflow is something they
plan to address.
Cheers,
Chris
___
Gnupg-users m
ion if
they want to achieve any sensible level of adoption.
There is another matter of key distribution and I guess they plan
on taking control over it to provide acceptable level of UX.
Cheers,
Chris
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
h
lly don't want to continue this
fruitless conversation.
Chris
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
> On 10/4/19 3:35 AM, Stefan Claas wrote:
>> And do those 20 companies business with their customers were GnuPG
>> signatures are legally binding, like real signatures on letters?
>
> _At least_ 20 fortune 500 businesses _that I know of_. Mind you, I'm
not even counting governments.
20? Wow.
d.
Cheers,
Chris
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
rry that you will be disappointed.
Cheers,
Chris Narkiewicz
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
threat profile.
Cheers,
Chris Narkiewicz
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On 26/08/2019 19:47, Wiktor Kwapisiewicz via Gnupg-users wrote:
> If one sets URL field on the
> token then just plugging the token when OpenKeychain is opened is enough
> to get the key ready-to-use.
Can you explain what kind of workflow do you mean here?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
one combination that provides reasonable
use experience on mobile.
Android + K-9 Mail + OpenKeychain + YubiKey with NFC.
Cheers,
Chris Narkiewicz
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://
by using 'gpgconf --kill gpg-agent'. Your
next invocation of a gpg command will launch a fresh daemon using the
correct version.
Chris
On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 11:50, Matthias Herrmann via Gnupg-users <
gnupg-users@gnupg.org> wrote:
> Hello
>
> I've recently upgraded to Debian buster, an
> I must have missed the memo
> describing the exact nature of the problem.
https://gist.github.com/rjhansen/67ab921ffb4084c865b3618d6955275f___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
did not publish his key?
Best regards,
Chris
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On Feb-23-19, Peter Lebbing wrote:
On 23/02/2019 12:43, Chris Coutinho wrote:
I'm not exactly sure what the difference is between that and a fingerprint
A key's fingerprint is something specific to OpenPGP. It includes
OpenPGP-specific information and formats. As such, it is undefined
.
Cheers,
Chris
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
nds
for systemd-based remotes?
Regards,
Chris
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
:
$ gpgconf --list-dir socketdir
/home/chris/.gnupg
On remote:
$ gpgconf --list-dir socketdir
/run/user/1001/gnupg
Regards,
Chris
On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 at 11:42, Chris Coutinho wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to forward my local gpg-agent over ssh to a remote that
> controls the gnupg sock
OpenKeychain plus K9, both free and fully featured.
On November 3, 2018 12:04:45 PM EDT, Yagthara Aghhay-Boor
wrote:
>Hello Group,
>
>I'm very new to GPG and email encryption and looking for a app to use
>gpg
>and signed email on my android devices.
>Can you recommend me a email app to use
Yep did all of that, my auth key is in sshcontrol. Pagent simply doesn't
see it, and ssh-add -l is blank. If I connect my PGP smartcard it works
just fine.
If I do a gpg --list-keys my keys all show up just fine.
'Tis a mystery.
Chris
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 12:08 AM NIIBE Yutaka wrote
a smart card?
Chris
--
Chris Horry
Ham Radio - KG4TSM
zer...@gmail.com
https://twitter.com/zerbey <http://twitter.com/zerbey>
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Werne,
Thanks for letting me know and for the patch,
73,
Chris
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 10:34 AM Werner Koch wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Oct 2018 21:04, zer...@gmail.com said:
>
> > gpg: bad data signature from key : Wrong key usage (0x19, 0x2)
> > Secret key is available.
&g
was revoked on 2018-09-26 by RSA key Chris
Horry
sub rsa4096/
created: 2018-09-23 revoked: 2018-09-26 usage: SEA
The following key was revoked on 2018-09-26 by RSA key Chris
Horry
sub rsa4096/
created: 2018-09-23 revoked: 2018-09-26 usage: E
[ultimate] (1). Chris Horry
Thanks for your reply Peter, the ForwardAgent flag is exactly what I was
looking for. Although some sources note the potential security holes of
using this method, it works great for my use case
https://heipei.github.io/2015/02/26/SSH-Agent-Forwarding-considered-harmful/
Regards,
Chris
, and from there connect to a third remote git server
using the ssh credentials from my local machine.
Is this functionality available?
Regards,
Chris
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http
far as thorough about consolidating. If someone can point
me to another resource on this topic, I would certainly appreciate it.
Best Regards,
Chris
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http
Hi,
I have a question around key expiry that I can't seem to find any thorough
documentation on; & the @Gnupg twitter account pointed me here.
What purpose does key expiration have?
At first I thought it may be a mechanism for revalidating private key ownership
but key expiration doesnt
On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 18:52 +0200, Francesco Ariis wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 08:58:59AM -0500, Chris wrote:
> >
> > I've noticed the above recently when I see a post from certain
> > users
> > including myself in a couple of the Ubuntu mailing lists. I don't
signature: parse error
I'm not sure what else to post here for anyone to look at that may help
but I believe it's something to do with the list that changed and not
on my end. If I can post any more information please let me know.
Chris
--
Chris
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C
31.11972; -97.90167 (Elev. 1092
04231C T
OPENPGP.1 - - - - -
OK
– I don't have an authentication subkey.
I know this is much information, but as all of this was asked for in the thread
mentioned above, I thought it'd be better providing you with all of these
outputs now than sending them one at a
I have asked this on HN[1] as well as Reddit[2] too, but I realised you
people might be a better audience for the question! (...And it gives me
a good excuse to subscribe to my first mailing list!) Question below:
Understanding how git works internally "from the ground up" has been
incredibly
d world is more open to third party developers so it's
probably easier there, but I expect it should be possible either way.
Regardless, if the system relies on code you can't see, then (in
principle) you can't trust it completely.
-Chris
___
Gnup
On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 07:40 +0200, Hauke Laging wrote:
Am Do 02.10.2014, 22:38:56 schrieb Chris:
I'm having to put my system back together again after my Mandriva box
crashed back in August. I'm up to getting my key installed and when
sending myself a test post I get this:
gpg: WARNING
: [159 bits]
gpg: armor header:
gpg: Signature made Fri 03 Oct 2014 07:56:45 PM CDT using DSA key ID
98E6705C
gpg: using PGP trust model
gpg: key 98E6705C: accepted as trusted key
gpg: Good signature from Chris Pollock (New email address as of
04/21/07) cpoll...@embarqmail.com
gpg: aka
: using PGP trust model
gpg: Good signature from Chris Pollock (New email address as of
04/21/07) cpoll...@embarqmail.com
gpg: aka Chris Pollock cpoll...@earthlink.net
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication
T=1 protocol
Reading commands from STDIN
00 44 00 00
00 44 00 00
6A 88 : Wrong parameter(s) P1-P2. Referenced data not found.
Thanks,
Chris
--
Chris Boot
bo...@bootc.net
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http
wish I hadn't fat-fingered my terminal and
closed it.
For others following this thread, 'scriptor' is in the pcsc-tools
package in Debian, and seems to be a pretty neat if scary tool for
sending raw ADPUs to smart cards.
Thanks again Peter for pointing me at that Python script.
Cheers,
Chris
On 11/03/2014 21:00, Peter Lebbing wrote:
On 11/03/14 18:20, Chris Boot wrote:
scd reset
[...]
reset
You forgot the 'scd' prefix on reset. That might be the problem.
Sadly that makes no difference either :-(
Cheers,
Chris
--
Chris Boot
bo...@bootc.net
can't even get gpg-connect-agent to talk to the
cards now (gpg: OpenPGP card not available: Not supported), nor even
tools like opensc-explorer.
Please CC me as I'm not subscribed.
Cheers,
Chris
--
Chris Boot
bo...@bootc.net
___
Gnupg-users mailing
to the
serialno command:
$ gpg-connect-agent
/hex
reset
OK
scd serialno undefined
ERR 100663356 Not supported SCD
scd apdu 00 e6 00 00
ERR 100663351 Invalid value SCD
scd apdu 00 44 00 00
ERR 100663351 Invalid value SCD
This is running GnuPG 2.0.22.
Cheers,
Chris
--
Chris Boot
bo
On 2014-02-24 15:28:12 +0800, Chris Down wrote:
I use SCIM[0] to input Pinyin on Linux. This works with other programs,
but not the GTK pinentry dialog for gpg-agent.
I just tried with pinentry-qt4, and it works, so I guess I'll use that
for now. It would be nice if this was looked into, though
I use SCIM[0] to input Pinyin on Linux. This works with other programs,
but not the GTK pinentry dialog for gpg-agent.
In gpg-agent, no characters are recorded when I press keys. Disabling
SCIM fixes this problem, but that's not an acceptable solution for me --
I need it.
The changelog notes
) applications using:
gpgme_set_engine_info(GPGME_PROTOCOL_OpenPGP,c:\\gnupg\\gpg.exe,
c:\\Users\\Chris\\AppData\\Roaming\\gnupg\\);
gpgme_check_version (NULL);
err = gpgme_get_engine_info (info);
printf( version = %s \n, info-version );
fail_if_err (err);
The test app t-engine-info prints out
Robert J. Hansen rjh at sixdemonbag.org writes:
What I note immediately is EXPORTS is declared twice. Now, I'm hardly a
libtool expert, but this seems ... incorrect. Any ideas?
I was curious what you did to fix this issue? As I am also running into it,
and I'm not sure where to go from
On 12/17/2013 2:54 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
The amount of energy we're talking about here is so large there is a
non-zero chance it would disturb the false vacuum of spacetime and
annihilate the cosmos.
Well, probably not - because in order to apply this energy to your
brute-force
On 11/19/2013 3:50 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
[...]
then used to do all further crypto operations. To put the data forever
beyond recovery, you generate a new nonce, encrypt it with the same
passphrase, and write it over the old nonce. If someone demands your
cryptographic key you can
better than throwing my hands in
the air. :) )
Thanks!
-Chris
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Hi,
That might be the cause for the problem. The translations (*.mo) files
from the old installer may not match the newer gettext version as used
by gpgex.
good point and thanks for this hint. Will try to use the
gpg4win-light-2.1.2-beta20.exe and let you know when i still have this
problem.
it to you via a
direct e-mail.
Thanks
Chris
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Hi,
just want to let you know that using the latest gpgex-1.0.0-beta24 on a
german windows 7 professional sp1 64bit system leads to some strange
context menus [1].
Using beta19 doesn't translate the context menu to german but the
context menu is not broken.
[1]
with a pen, and mailing it to the one
you want it to go to yourself?
If the idea is that the document isn't a format that lends itself to
printing, how do they merge your signature image with it in any
meaningful way that you couldn't do yourself just as easily?
Just curious...
-Chris
algorithms:
Pubkey: RSA, ELG, DSA
Cipher: 3DES, CAST5, BLOWFISH, AES, AES192, AES256, TWOFISH, CAMELLIA128,
CAMELLIA192, CAMELLIA256
Hash: MD5, SHA1, RIPEMD160, SHA256, SHA384, SHA512, SHA224
Compression: Uncompressed, ZIP, ZLIB, BZIP2
Thanks,
Chris
Got it, I will try that next. Thanks.
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Hauke Laging mailinglis...@hauke-laging.de
wrote:
Am Mi 25.07.2012, 12:48:57 schrieb Chris Clifton:
Forgive me, can you elaborate on 'encrypting the file to the other one
and
your own key' ?
You can give several
Forgive me, can you elaborate on 'encrypting the file to the other one and
your own key' ?
Thanks,
Chris
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Hauke Laging
mailinglis...@hauke-laging.de wrote:
Am Mi 25.07.2012, 10:37:54 schrieb Chris Clifton:
I moved the gpg keyring to the new server and can
decrypt with our key at
least.
Thanks,
Chris
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Hauke Laging mailinglis...@hauke-laging.de
wrote:
Am Mi 25.07.2012, 12:48:57 schrieb Chris Clifton:
Forgive me, can you elaborate on 'encrypting the file to the other one
and
your own key' ?
You can give
.
Cheers
Chris Poole
[PGP BAD246F9]
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
, DSA or Elgamal.
Are you able to recommend any particular resources or books that cover ECC in a
more complete and up to date fashion?
Cheers
Chris Poole
[PGP BAD246F9]
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org
On 1 Feb 2012, at 15:00, Robert J. Hansen r...@sixdemonbag.org wrote:
Googling for nsa suite b qould be a pretty good starting place,
probably. The National Security Agency has approved the use of ECC for
classified material as part of their Suite B cryptography package. As
is the case with
On 1 Feb 2012, at 15:41, Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org wrote:
@book{Hankerson:2003:GEC:940321
Thank you, that's useful.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
.)
Cheers,
Chris
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
think it's kind of absurd to have a larger signing subkey
than the primary key. The weak link in the chain is going to be the
primary key.
That makes sense, thanks.
Chris
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org
keys but
also the signatures on the subkeys.
That was what I hadn't thought about. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.
Cheers,
Chris
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
is still being done by the subkeys, so is
it simply that they're signed by the parent 1024-bit key, and this key
is easier to fake?
Thanks,
Chris Poole
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Hi,
I start gpg-agent with the -q option to make it quiet.
I then run a script that executes gpg -qse ... on several files,
encrypting and signing them (quietly).
I still find output like this in my terminal window:
You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for
user: Chris Poole ch
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Peter Lebbing pe...@digitalbrains.com wrote:
The trick obviously is that find can do multiple executions. I didn't know
this
either, I just tried it out :). There are different variations. This one
outputs
the hashes on stdout, and I don't know a way to
://grepular.com/Automatically_Encrypting_all_Incoming_Email
Thanks, that's interesting reading. I use `getmail` to grab the messages, and
just pass them through gpg when this runs, so it works well for what I want.
Cheers
Chris Poole
[PGP BAD246F9]
___
Gnupg
already been tampered
with, is it OK to simply run
gpg -o somefile.gpg -s somefile.gpg
or is it better to decrypt them all, and then sign and encrypt in one go?
Thanks,
Chris Poole
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 10:27 PM, David Tomaschik
da...@systemoverlord.com wrote:
I would just produce a list of SHA1s of the files and then sign that.
OK thanks, I hadn't thought of that. I'd still have to decrypt and re-encrypt
them to keep hashes of all plaintext versions of the files though.
about, but presumably it is the same
as on unix-like machines.
In this case, the things you type are being passed to the program correctly,
it's just that nothing is shown on screen (no ***'s, etc) to inform you of this.
Cheers
Chris Poole
[PGP BAD246F9
confirm that gpg works correctly for you, such that your bad
passphrase warning you're getting is the result of you having and/or entering
an incorrect passphrase.
Best of luck.
Chris Poole
[PGP BAD246F9]
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users
-and-decryption-cache? (I guess, if I really wanted this I
should provide a patch. :-) )
That was precisely my point; if anything, entering the passphrase twice is more
of a security risk than storing it for 2 subkeys at the same time (risk of being
overlooked, etc.).
Cheers
Chris Poole
[PGP BAD246F9
your passphrase has been cached for each of those *actions*, it
will remain in gpg-agent's memory for the duration of the cache set in
your home directory ~/.gnupg/gpg-agent.conf
That's a shame, but thanks.
Cheers
Chris Poole
[PGP BAD246F9]
___
Gnupg
) once for the
encryption key, and then again, for the signing key.
Can I instruct the agent to give the passphrase for any subkey? Given
that they're both subkeys, the passphrases are the same.
Thanks
Chris Poole
[PGP BAD246F9]
___
Gnupg-users mailing
keys, so I'm being prompted twice, but they
are both belonging to the same primary key: can that passphrase apply to all
subkeys when entered for any one?
I hope that clarifies what I want to do...
Cheers
Chris Poole
[PGP BAD246F9]
___
Gnupg-users
, to make
sure corruption didn't occur during network transfer (i.e., nothing
cryptographic).
Thanks for the help. I'm just going to get used to entering my
passphrase a little more!
Cheers
Chris Poole
[PGP BAD246F9]
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg
change the encrypted data in
such a way that I won't notice it when I decrypt the file, but somehow
the file will still decrypt?
Thanks
Chris Poole
PGP key: BAD246F9
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo
, where did you read this?)
I can't remember, but possibly some Duplicity documentation. It's a backup
program that uses gpg for encryption, and allows for both encryption and
signing.
Cheers
Chris Poole
[PGP BAD246F9]
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg
be in a certain container isn't, or something extra is
there in its place.
Have you considered a separate key for the signature?
I use a separate signing key anyway, for all my signatures. How would using a
separate key help here?... I'd still need to give my passphrase somehow.
Cheers
Chris Poole
[PGP
to realise this, somehow. A separate manifest file (also encrypted)
keeps track of which encrypted containers hold which files, so the attack is
definitely harder (or at least more noticeable). I think it's still best to sign
though, just to remove more possible attack vectors.
Cheers
Chris Poole
count (in the secret key packet section). Does this map
to the number I gave on the command line when changing my passphrase?
Thanks
Chris Poole
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
as a SHA512 digest after 6553600
iterations of the hash function?
Cheers
Chris
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Thank you.
On 8 Jul 2011, at 20:06, Hauke Laging mailinglis...@hauke-laging.de wrote:
Am Freitag, 8. Juli 2011, 20:35:57 schrieb Chris Poole:
On 8 Jul 2011, at 17:31, David Shaw ds...@jabberwocky.com wrote:
Yes. Note that the list-packets output shows the internal packed value:
6553600
it takes to run for x.y seconds
would be useful. KeePass, for example, automatically calculates how many rounds
can be calculated in 1 second, and will set the count accordingly.
On 8 Jul 2011, at 20:08, David Shaw ds...@jabberwocky.com wrote:
On Jul 8, 2011, at 2:35 PM, Chris Poole wrote
can
just use the --s2k-count flag again, to change this. Presumably it's pretty
pointless to change the count for asymmetrically-encrypted messages, since the
session key will be long enough to discourage any brute forcing anyway.
Cheers
Chris
On 4 Jul 2011, at 04:01, David Shaw ds
passphrase, then pass it through the key stretching algorithm
that gpg uses, before trying to decrypt the key. How often does the work
function defining how long the key stretching process take, get updated? (I
can't find an option to make it user configurable.)
Thanks
Chris
On 3 Jul 2011, at 01:38
Hi,
I changed the order of preferred ciphers and hash functions using setpref. My
public key has changed, but not the fingerprint.
Is the done thing now to ask anyone with the key to pull the latest version?
(I've already updated the keyserver version.)
Thanks
the passphrase cache time?
I was decrypting a large number of files ( 12,000), and about half
way through I was asked for my passphrase again. I assume the cache
had expired.
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Grant Olson k...@grant-olson.net wrote:
On 5/19/2011 7:07 AM, Chris Poole wrote:
Hi
I often
on the matter, or even
whether or not this is the best approach.
Thanks
Chris Poole
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Git repository in /path/to/libgcrypt/.git/
fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
$ git clone git://git.gnupg.org/libksba/trunk libksba
Initialized empty Git repository in /path/to/libksba/.git/
fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
TIA
--
__
Chris Ruff
the options
debug-ccid-driver
debug 2048
log-file /foo/bar/scdaemon.log
- to ~/.gnupg/scdaemon.log .
+ to ~/.gnupg/scdaemon.conf
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
__
Chris Ruff
email: jcr...@gmail.com
gpg key: 0xDD55B6FC
gpg fgpr: 1BA1 71D7 ADA7 1E8B 1623
it should say =2.0. Feedback from others if this was
a typo in teh doc and should be =2.0?
--
__
Chris Ruff
email: jcr...@gmail.com
gpg key: 0xDD55B6FC
gpg fgpr: 1BA1 71D7 ADA7 1E8B 1623
A43D 283B 2F81 BDD5 B810
1 - 100 of 203 matches
Mail list logo
