On Saturday 27 February 2010, Doug Barton wrote:
On 02/26/10 10:34, Martin Bretschneider wrote:
Hi,
I want to recreate my GnuPG keys. My question is if I can omit the
email address? Since I do not want my email addresses to appear on
the keyservers because of spammers and so on.
On Saturday 27 February 2010, Martin Bretschneider wrote:
Am Samstag 27 Februar 2010 schrieb Laurent Jumet:
Hi Laurent,
Martin Bretschneider mailing-lists-m...@bretschneidernet.de wrote:
I want to recreate my GnuPG keys. My question is if I can omit
the email address? Since I do not
On Sunday 24 January 2010, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
On 01/23/2010 03:57 PM, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
Yes, there is. The (obvious) explanation is: You didn't post
anything to this list before March 5, 2006. ;-)
This seems ... strange. It does not jibe with my memory at all, not
one bit
On Saturday 23 January 2010, Chris De Young wrote:
Sven Radde wrote:
Hi!
Mark H. Wood schrieb:
I too would like to find some way to get the word
out about what it is and why my correspondent might find it
desirable.
What about inline signatures when emailing people that do not yet
On Saturday 23 January 2010, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
A while ago I downloaded the entire archives of the GnuPG-Users
mailing list, from the first message to the present. (Having this
archive makes it a lot easier to refer people to older threads that
addressed the same subject.)
Strangely,
On Sunday 08 November 2009, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
What I know is simple. I created a key today and tried it signing one
file and it worked. Now, few hours later, I cannot do anything, and a
message is wrong passphrase. I checked mod.time of secret keyring and
it looks like was not modified
On Thursday 01 October 2009, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 09/30/2009 05:32 PM, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
Hmm, AFAIU, for someone who does not blindly certify such keys this
shouldn't be a problem since those malicious keys wouldn't be valid
and thus wouldn't take preference over a valid key
On Wednesday 30 September 2009, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
Thanks for the discussion, Ingo! This is really useful to me, and i
appreciate the thought you've obviously put in here.
Thank you, the same to you! You really make me thinking.
On 09/29/2009 04:32 PM, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
She
On Tuesday 29 September 2009, nschroth wrote:
Interesting. The key is not listed twice, but...
--list-keys PrimaryUserName shows ALL THREE keys while
--list-keys PrimaryEmailAddress shows only the primary host key.
Could it be that the name I used for the primary key was CompanyName
and
On Monday 28 September 2009, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 09/25/2009 02:40 PM, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
0xF661F608 (This is _not_ one of my keys. Funny enough this Ingo
Klöcker went to the same school and the same university as I did.)
0x104B0FAF, 0x5706A4B4, 0xD96484AC, 0x7C52AC99
On Friday 25 September 2009, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 09/24/2009 04:56 PM, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
Does it also work with keys like 0xCB0D4CAF or 0xAB1BC4E6 created
with PGP 6 (or earlier) where the user ID is not UTF-8 encoded?
hm; 0xCB0D4CAF looks to me like it expired 5 years ago
On Friday 25 September 2009, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 09/25/2009 11:06 AM, David Shaw wrote:
What troubles me about this sort of behavior is that it is
genuinely good and helpful in some cases and baffling and
off-putting in others. For example, someone has two different Alice
keys
On Thursday 24 September 2009, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 09/23/2009 06:04 PM, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
I'm pretty sure that this will break horribly as soon as the user
ID contains non-ASCII characters (as does my user ID). For exactly
this reason I made KMail use the key ID instead
On Wednesday 23 September 2009, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 09/23/2009 12:17 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
Please keep in mind that using a user ID is just to help the user
in the most common case. Any proper mail tool won't accept such a
solution but either presenr the user a list of matching
On Thursday 27 August 2009, debianfeed wrote:
Hello
does anybody here know a possibility to use gpg key-groups under
gnome? groups defined in the gpg.conf
(e.g. group mygroupname = 0x9DB0 0x9540)
do not show up in nautilus' seahorse extension.
kgpg is capable of dealing with
On Sunday 21 June 2009, Michel Messerschmidt wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 02:42:45AM -0500, John Clizbe wrote:
Joel C. Salomon wrote:
gpg command line and output:
C:\\Program Files\\GNU\\GnuPG\\gpg.exe --charset utf8 --batch
--no-tty --status-fd 2 --keyserver-options
On Monday 08 June 2009, Werner Koch wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 22:52, malte.g...@gmx.de said:
Does the GPG4Win package support the GnuPG smartcard? Of course,
given there is a reader and its driver installed first...
Yes.
And, how powerful is the Claws client? Does it support multiple
On Saturday 06 June 2009, Kārlis Repsons wrote:
On Saturday 06 June 2009 13:30:08 David Shaw wrote:
On Jun 6, 2009, at 5:26 AM, Kārlis Repsons wrote:
Hi,
still I have questions :)
This time: is there some gnupg dictated way of setting preference
of which
signing/encrypting key to
On Monday 01 June 2009, Roger wrote:
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 22:52 +0100, Benjamin Donnachie wrote:
2009/5/31 Roger rog...@sdf.lonestar.org:
I know this sounds ridiculous, but when you consider a
console/terminal to be as good look'n as a girl, and then you're
made to a X window and
On Saturday 16 May 2009, webmas...@felipe1982.com wrote:
I will do my best to describe as succinctly and clearly as possible.
To begin, I use openSUSE, openoffice for documents, and [usually]
kmail for email. I created a document in OOo and clicked on the
'email' button to send it to my other
On Wednesday 06 May 2009, Steven W. Orr wrote:
I'm running Fedora 10 (if anyone cares) with
gnupg2-2.0.10-1.fc10.i386.
I'm up and rolling, but I'd like to know more about configuring the
agent. I started the agent via the recommended incantation:
eval $(gpg-agent --daemon)
in my
On Saturday 25 April 2009, John Clizbe wrote:
david wrote:
Hi all,
Late here in Cyprus, in Thunderbird, OpenPGP I can sign and encrypt
- but say I cc'd to a few people - because if those people are in
my key ring will it encrypt for each?
If a valid key can be located for each
On Saturday 18 April 2009, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
Faramir wrote:
And my last question is how to find for a specific key ?
I am not sure, the GUIs I use do that for me.
gpg --keyserver x-hkp://pool.sks.keyservers.net --recv-key [keyID]
Or, if you do not know the key ID:
gpg
On Friday 06 March 2009, Thomas Bohn wrote:
I currently try to get the gpg-agent to start just one time and not
to get one more gpg-agent session each time I log in, but it doesn't
work.
Even the hint in the gpg-agent man page won't work, I still get more
than one gpg-agent process and more
On Monday 16 February 2009, Werner Koch wrote:
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:48, faramir...@gmail.com said:
The signatures not checked seems pretty self explanatory. What
does the bad signatures mean?
The signed data does not match the signature. That is the signed
data or the signature has
On Wednesday 11 February 2009, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
Dr. Scott S. Jones wrote:
I run both Win xp and ubuntu 8.10. My wife runs win xp on her
laptop. We are at the point now where we both want to enable
encrypted emailing AND we want to find a nice way of educating
those we email to
On Wednesday 11 February 2009, David Shaw wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:59:48PM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer
wrote:
A good workaround is to use disk encryption (dm-crypt or similar
things).
Encrypted disks don't help without serious OS support around suspend.
Obviously.
Your
On Wednesday 11 February 2009, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 22:37 +0100, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
Your machine suspends, and writes a snapshot of its memory to
disk. Sure, let's say it's even encrypted. When you wake the
machine, is the encrypted disk still mounted
On Wednesday 11 February 2009, David Shaw wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:37:43PM +0100, Ingo Kl?cker wrote:
On Wednesday 11 February 2009, David Shaw wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:59:48PM +0100, Christoph Anton
Mitterer
wrote:
A good workaround is to use disk encryption
On Sunday 08 February 2009, Ian Hill wrote:
I have a question about paperkey, bearing in mind that this
application may not always be available can one restore the secret
key just using the printed paperkey and the public key from
keyservers manually.
Yes. All you need to know is the format
On Sunday 08 February 2009, Alex Amiryan wrote:
I've printed out my paperkey and keeping it in my home. I am not
making any illegal things, so police will not come to investigate my
house one day :).
You are using GnuPG. Unfortunately, this makes you suspicious in the
eyes of lots of people.
On Sunday 08 February 2009, Alex Amiryan wrote:
Ingo Klöcker wrote:
On Sunday 08 February 2009, Alex Amiryan wrote:
I've printed out my paperkey and keeping it in my home. I am not
making any illegal things, so police will not come to investigate
my house one day :).
You are using
On Friday 06 February 2009, Chris Babcock wrote:
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 06:11:32 -0800 (PST)
raj raj kayr...@yahoo.com wrote:
Is there are command to supress these 2 lines.
gpg: Signature made using DSA key ID
gpg: Good signature xx.com
It would help if you'd tell us why you want to
On Thursday 29 January 2009, Peter Thomas wrote:
2009/1/28 Ingo Klöcker kloec...@kde.org:
See http://www.fourmilab.ch/hotbits/ for a random number generator
using radioactive decay.
Under http://von-und-fuer-lau.de/ct-randcam.html you can download a
(mostly) non-deterministic random
On Wednesday 28 January 2009, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
Peter Thomas wrote:
I've read about special hardware devices that (claim to) give true
random numbers, some based on thermodynamics some even on quantum
mechanics.
True randomness exists in nature, but so far we're unable to detect
On Sunday 25 January 2009, Faramir wrote:
David Shaw escribió:
On Jan 24, 2009, at 4:46 PM, Faramir wrote:
David Newman escribió:
Michael Lucas' gpg/pgp book recommends setting a relatively short
expiration time, such as a year, for personal keys.
Well... I am not sure if that is a
On Saturday 03 January 2009, Chris wrote:
On Friday 02 January 2009 20:39:04 Chris wrote:
I've updated my Mandrake 10.1 box to 2009. On the 10.1 system gpg
and gpg-agent were working smoothly. I installed gnupg-2.0.9 from
source and copied my old .conf files over to the .gnupg folder. I
On Saturday 03 January 2009, Chris wrote:
On Saturday 03 January 2009 05:59:26 Ingo Klöcker wrote:
On Saturday 03 January 2009, Chris wrote:
On Friday 02 January 2009 20:39:04 Chris wrote:
I've updated my Mandrake 10.1 box to 2009. On the 10.1 system
gpg and gpg-agent were working
On Saturday 03 January 2009, Chris wrote:
On Saturday 03 January 2009 11:07:47 Chris wrote:
On Saturday 03 January 2009 09:21:58 Ingo Klöcker wrote:
Starting as root worked
Please don't do anything as root. It is totally unnecessary, very
dangerous and will only lead to confusion
On Monday 03 November 2008, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
Fair enough, but I think all these examples rely on faulty or
insufficient metadata. For instance if the from, to, cc, bcc and
subject headers were included in the sealing, things like this
would not happen. (Not sure exactly what headers
On Thursday 30 October 2008, Ramon Loureiro wrote:
Hi
How can I delete my signature from a given keyID?
Why do you want to delete your signature?
If the key (including your signature) has already been uploaded to a
keyserver then removing your signature is pointless. Instead you might
want
On Thursday 25 September 2008, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
David Shaw wrote:
It seems odd for a malware author to spend time going after such a
small target market. Going after company-wide installs, perhaps?
I would imagine the author thinks people with keyrings are high-value
targets, who
On Monday 11 August 2008, reynt0 wrote:
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008, Andrew Berg wrote:
. . .
I've gotten into the habit of typing my passwords very quickly with
very little finger movement in order to make it difficult for
anyone looking over my shoulder to figure them out.
Or anyone sitting
On Monday 28 July 2008, Carlos Williams wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Faramir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Kunal Shah escribió:
I am not getting my own messages or reply to any of my messages.
It seems it is usual with gmail to don't be able to see your own
messages, at least,
On Saturday 28 June 2008, Faramir wrote:
Well, as far as I know, it adds support for s/MIME... and if I am not
wrong, that would mean certificates like the ones issued by CAcert,
Comodo, et all... But, is GnuPG capable of generating those
certificates? Or we will still require OpenSSL or
On Thursday 29 May 2008, Non scrivetemi wrote:
I just tryed the plug-in Enigmail on Thunderbird, and it seems very
good.
Enigmail is indeed quite brilliant. It's so good that once you've
installed it you quickly yearn for a better mail client than
Thunderbird, which is as bug-ridden a
On Saturday 24 May 2008, Paul Cartwright wrote:
On Fri May 23 2008, Nicholas Sushkin wrote:
You need gnupg2 package for KMail to support S/MIME.
well, I found that you can change the path for gpg 1.4.9 using
the ./configure --prefix=PATH. so I recompiled it with /usr/bin
instead of the
On Sunday 20 April 2008, Jamie Griffin wrote:
now that you've clarified that you're better than us 'normal' folk,
perhaps you'd care to explain it in more detail. For the benefit of
the list of course.
Robert neither wrote nor implied this. The lesson you should learn from
Robert is that you
On Wednesday 09 April 2008, Paul wrote:
On Wed, 09 Apr 2008 02:42:08 -0500
Robert J. Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't really matter if there were a hundred other S/MIME
implementations tested by Sphinx, or if GnuPG's S/MIME
implementation was the only one. The Sphinx evaluation
On Thursday 03 April 2008, Sven Radde wrote:
Hi!
Am Donnerstag, den 03.04.2008, 18:41 +0200 schrieb Werner Koch:
The real reason for GnuPG-2 is the support for S/MIME.
I'm just curious and do not mean to be offensive or to belittle the
effort to implement S/MIME, but is GnuPG's S/MIME
On Thursday 21 February 2008, Maury Markowitz wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 1:53 PM, John Clizbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
For the passphrase issue: the times I've seen this, it is usually
due to the passphrase having characters that don't map into the
command line code-page.
Wait, is
On Friday 25 January 2008, Sascha Wilde wrote:
Ingo Klöcker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 24 January 2008, Sascha Wilde wrote:
Bernhard Reiter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SPOILER WARNING - SPOILER WARNING - SPOILER WARNING - SPOILER
WARNING
Hi,
on Wednesday 23 January 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sorry,
forgot that this list changes the email address
by replacing the @ with the word 'at'
so the previous clearsigned post came out bad,
;-((
This list doesn't do such a thing. Your messages arrived with a good
signature in my
On Thursday 20 December 2007, Robert D. wrote:
I was trying to build 2.0.8 on my Intel mac and came across these
errors and found libassuan and libksba but not Pth and also
wonder where do I put them so the make-file can find them?
I suggest to have a look at the Fink project
On Thursday 28 June 2007 10:24, Ken Takusagawa wrote:
I have many files that are all encrypted with the same public key,
and the private key is protected with a passphrase. Is there a way
that I can decrypt all of them at once, concatenate the results and
print it all to standard output but
On Friday 25 May 2007 05:09, engage wrote:
On Thursday 24 May 2007 11:54, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
On Thursday 24 May 2007 01:21, engage wrote:
I wasn't prompted for a passphrase!
gnupg2-1.9.22-2.2mdv2007.0
gnupg-1.4.7-0.2mdv2007.0
kdepim-kmail-3.5.4-12mdv2007.0
That's just a wild
On Thursday 24 May 2007 01:21, engage wrote:
I wasn't prompted for a passphrase!
gnupg2-1.9.22-2.2mdv2007.0
gnupg-1.4.7-0.2mdv2007.0
kdepim-kmail-3.5.4-12mdv2007.0
That's just a wild guess, but the usual reason for this behavior is that
gpg-agent is not setup correctly. I suggest you read
On Monday 02 April 2007 17:34, Werner Koch wrote:
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 17:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
No, you're misunderstanding me. I'm not concerned with the
technical user who posts a question to a news list and understands
the issue. I'm wondering about the non-technical (business) user
Am Dienstag, 25. Juli 2006 08:43 schrieb Atom Smasher:
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, David Shaw wrote:
Note that there is a difference between what page at
http://www.hantslug.org.uk/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?LinuxHints/KeySigning
says and what you say above. The page (correctly) notes that all
that is
On Saturday 15 July 2006 08:42, Laurent Jumet wrote:
Hello !
Does somebody has an explanation about this fact:
Checking a ClearSign signature inside my mailer answers Bad.
Copying that message inside the clipboard and checking it,
answers Good.
May be this could happen
On Sunday 09 July 2006 06:27, Alphax wrote:
Michael Kallas wrote:
David Shaw schrieb:
I've been away on vacation and only picked up this thread now.
This statement is not correct. Back in the PGP 2.x days, this
might have been true, but with OpenPGP, there is no particular
requirement
Am Freitag, 7. Juli 2006 06:31 schrieb Todd Zullinger:
What I don't see in any of the links is more information about
sending an email challenge before signing a key. (My apologies if
I'm overlooking it on your page or any of the others.)
It's been discussed here before but I've not found
On Friday 07 July 2006 16:56, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Ingo Klöcker wrote:
I haven't used it myself because I'm using a self-written script
for creating challenges with KMail.
Could you elaborate a little on the procedure you use to generate the
challenges? I'd love to have some examples
On Friday 07 July 2006 17:09, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Marcus Frings wrote:
* Todd Zullinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I don't see in any of the links is more information about
sending an email challenge before signing a key. (My apologies if
I'm overlooking it on your page or any of
Am Dienstag, 13. Juni 2006 09:02 schrieb Samuel ]slund:
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 11:55:54PM +0200, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
No, it doesn't. You are still believing in security-by-obscurity
meaning that your additional encryption only works as long as you
and the recipient are the only ones who
On Tuesday 13 June 2006 19:03, markus reichelt wrote:
* markus reichelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Essentially you're saying: no backup of a private key generated
on/via a smartcard cannot be exported. Because if it could be
exported, importing the key(s) in question just works.
Sorry, that
Am Montag, 12. Juni 2006 04:42 schrieb Tom Thekathyil:
A wishes to send message to B.
A encrypts message using B's key. Opens encrypted message and
corrupts the file by altering one or more characters/adding redundant
lines of code, e.g. changes case of first occurrence of 'T' in the
code.
On Monday 12 June 2006 22:15, Tom Thekathyil wrote:
Hi Robert,
Thanks for your response: that was for a trivial case :)
Now let's try a curveball. We substitute lines 9 to 12 for the
equivalent _somewhere else_ in the code, so it won't be a simple
transform. This is based on a rule that a
On Sunday 04 June 2006 07:54, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Ingo Klöcker wrote:
On Saturday 03 June 2006 04:57, engage wrote:
On Thursday 01 June 2006 08:59 pm, Todd Zullinger wrote:
engage wrote:
Why is someone sending an encrypted message to this list?
It's not encrypted. It's just signed
On Saturday 03 June 2006 04:57, engage wrote:
On Thursday 01 June 2006 08:59 pm, Todd Zullinger wrote:
engage wrote:
Why is someone sending an encrypted message to this list?
It's not encrypted. It's just signed and armored.
Doesn't your mail client automatically display this for you?
On Monday 15 May 2006 11:04, Adam Funk wrote:
(Two apologies: this is slightly off-topic, and I've also posted the
same question to the debian-user list.)
You should have tried [EMAIL PROTECTED] :-)
I'm running the Debian kmail 3.3.2-3 package and gpg 1.4.3 compiled
from the source.
As far
301 - 371 of 371 matches
Mail list logo
