On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 09:54:45PM +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
> |No it isn't. Changing the subject and adding the footer is a damaging
> |anti-pattern from mid-nineties. If the end-user wants to filter mail, \
> |they can
> |do it based on the List-Id header or any other criteria. Lists
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 06:45:37PM +0200, Alessandro Vesely via Gnupg-users
wrote:
> > What the list-software would need to do is to strip the original DKIM
> > signature
>
> Why? Original signatures can often be recovered. They shouldn't be removed
> anyway.
If list-software is doing
On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 03:22:42PM +0200, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
> >> > gpg (GnuPG) 2.0.22
>
> That version reached end-of-life more than 5 years ago. Don't use it.
If you need a newer version of GnuPG for RHEL7 systems, you can install
gnupg24-static from this COPR:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 09:22:36AM -0400, Todd Zullinger via Gnupg-users wrote:
> > Maybe it helps to report the problem of missing crypto algorithms to your
> > GNU/Linux distribution.
>
> They aren't really missing but rather intentionally removed
> due to legal issues on Fedora/Red Hat. This
On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 11:07:36PM +0200, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> > That key doesn't appear to be provided via
> > https://gnupg.org/signature_key.asc.
>
> Yes, it is.
>
> ```
> $ curl https://gnupg.org/signature_key.asc | gpg --import
> [...]
> gpg: key 549E695E905BA208: 1 signature not checked
On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 08:38:04PM +0200, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This is a quick announcement that a new GnuPG release for 2.2 is
> available. We will also preprare a 2.3 release in the next days but due
> to summer holidays things are a bit delayed.
Hello:
I'm trying to
On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 12:17:05PM -0400, Todd Zullinger via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> I wrote:
> > Dirk Gottschalk via Gnupg-users wrote:
> >> A workaround for this is to download the SRPM, remove the
> >> line '--disable-brainpool' and rebuild the package.
> >
> > Ahh, excellent.
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 12:32:50PM -0800, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) via Gnupg-users
wrote:
> Thus, using that as a prefetch method to grab the current version of our
> codesign@ key into our keyring is not helpful either, unless we "faked it"
> by attempting to encrypt a message to that address, then
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 05:53:53PM +0200, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> Am Dienstag 29 Juni 2021 14:44:39 schrieb Konstantin Ryabitsev via
> Gnupg-users:
> > With this change, they are replacing PGP with ed25519, but everything else
> > remains pretty much the same
>
> But O
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 08:37:56AM +0200, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> Am Sonntag 27 Juni 2021 18:56:15 schrieb Стефан Васильев via Gnupg-users:
> > maybe interesting for some of you.
> > https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Apt/Spec/AptSign
>
> This does not have references on the problems it is claiming
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 04:19:24PM +, Ajax via Gnupg-users wrote:
> > >> $ build-aux/getswdb.sh
> > >
> > > Which gave :
> > > ... No such file or directory
> >
> > $ tar tjvf gnupg-2.2.28.tar.bz2 | grep getswdb.sh
> > -rwxr-xr-x 1000/1000 4831 2021-05-21 07:35
> >
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 04:29:32PM +, Ajax via Gnupg-users wrote:
> With gnuupg-2.3.1
>
> make -f build-aux/speedo.mk native
>
> gives "download of swdb.lst failed"
>
> The above is on a Debian 10 buster box.
>
> I've not been able to find swdb.lst nor how to work without it; I'd be
>
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 09:46:01AM -0500, Robert J. Hansen via Gnupg-users
wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-01-05 at 15:38 +0100, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
> > Virtually nobody uses the WoT...
>
> Strangely, the Linux kernel folks still use it a decent amount.
> They're the only large group I can
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 07:27:14AM -0500, Jean-David Beyer via Gnupg-users
wrote:
> Building a web of trust is so hopeless, from my point of view, that I have
> abandonned gnupg. I have made keys for myself, obtained enigmail for my
> Firefox browser, etc. But those with whom I correspond by
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 05:37:57PM +0200, Stefan Claas wrote:
>
> Why I came up with this idea? Well I thought of a way to send private content
> digitally,
> without Internet usage, so that 3rd parties outside the EU have it difficult
> to intercept
> such messages, in order to protect EU
On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 06:44:35PM +0200, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Hello!
>
> We are pleased to announce the availability of a new GnuPG release:
> version 2.2.23. This version fixes a *critical security bug* in
> versions 2.2.21 and 2.2.22.
For those using gnupg22-static on el7 via
16 matches
Mail list logo
