Hello Werner,
Yesterday, Aug 8, Werner Koch wrote to lists.gnupg-us...@duinheks.nl about...:
WK You should better use
WK gpg --batch --sign --armour --clearsig --passphrase-fd 0 --yes -o
$1.asc $1
I will do that in future.
WK to avoid the mv. Even better use gpg-agent.
That will take
Hello,
I call PGP from Pine with a simple script:
#!/bin/sh
echo | /usr/bin/gpg --batch --sign --armour --clearsig
--passphrase-fd 0 $1
mv $1.asc $2
Lately I noticed that it did not work, withour giving me any
warning.
When I use it 'by hand' I see an error:
echo
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:58:38PM +0100 Also sprach Ingo Klöcker:
I claim that of all 4096 keys that can be found on the public keyservers
most have been created by people who just went for the highest number.
Because bigger must be better, right?
I cannot resist offering the following
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:36:57PM -0400 Also sprach Robert J. Hansen:
On 3/19/11 10:34 PM, Jonathan Ely wrote:
but be sure to set your preferences and choose a 4096 over 2048.
Why? This is like saying, I like the bank vault on my front door, but
I wish it was thicker: I want the extra
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 08:28:57AM -0700 Also sprach Robert J. Hansen:
IME, engineering starting from a base maxim of, why not?, ultimately
leads to curious things that leave you scratching your head (like the
aforementioned, why are you using SHA512 with DSA-1K?). This is why I
would much
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 09:40:07PM -0500 Also sprach David Tomaschik:
I've recently received my smart card, but was wondering what the best
practices are, mainly from a physical standpoint. When I use it in
my laptop reader, it sticks about 2 out of the side, and I have some
concern about this
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 01:13:16PM + Also sprach Guy Halford-Thompson:
Not GPG specific, but I was wondering if someone could point me in the
direction of some resources that explain why we use different keys to
sign and encrypt (for cases where the same key _could_ do both e.g.
RSA).
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 07:19:15AM -0500 Also sprach Jerry:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 14:55:14 -0500
Robert J. Hansen r...@sixdemonbag.org articulated:
On 2/19/11 9:53 AM, lists.gn...@mephisto.fastmail.net wrote:
Think we'll see this included one day in OpenPGP, or will we just
skip to SHA-3
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 05:38:47AM -0800 Also sprach AgoristTeen1994:
Okay thanks for the help though I'm still somewhat confused...I understand
that they key id is the entire keypair, but then how do I found out what is
just my public key, and just my secret key, the reason Im asking is
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 05:38:47AM -0800 Also sprach AgoristTeen1994:
Okay thanks for the help though I'm still somewhat confused...I understand
that they key id is the entire keypair, but then how do I found out what is
just my public key, and just my secret key, the reason Im asking is
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 14:02 +0100, Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 04:44:35 -0500, ved...@hush.com wrote:
symmetrical encryption is a simple way to avoid signing, while
still maintaining relative reliability of knowledge as to who sent
the message
That is not
11 matches
Mail list logo
