On Sun, 2021-06-13 at 14:06 +, knighttemplar5--- via Gnupg-users
wrote:
> I have been contemplating subscribing to an email forwarding service that
> will encrypt all the forwarded mails to me with my public key.
> Lets imagine the country where the forwarding takes place can see all my
>
On Fri, 2020-08-28 at 21:39 +0200, mlnl via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Hi,
>
> today, i have compiled 2.2.22 under Debian Buster. Decryption of
> files fail in terminal. Decryption of e-mails with Claws-Mail fail too.
> For Claws i had compiled and installed gpgme-1.12.1. I'm using a Yubikey
> for key
On Fri, 2020-08-28 at 21:39 +0200, mlnl via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Hi,
>
> today, i have compiled 2.2.22 under Debian Buster. Decryption of
> files fail in terminal. Decryption of e-mails with Claws-Mail fail too.
> For Claws i had compiled and installed gpgme-1.12.1. I'm using a Yubikey
> for key
On Mon, 2020-08-10 at 17:14 +0200, Stefan Claas wrote:
> ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್ via Gnupg-users wrote:
>
> > 10/08/20 09:07 ನಲ್ಲಿ, Stefan Claas ಬರೆದರು:
> > > Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > >
> > > > El día domingo, agosto 09, 2020 a las 10:06:13p. m. +0200, Stefan Claas
> > > > escribió:
> > > >
> > > > >
On Sun, 2020-07-05 at 14:30 +, renws via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've accidentally deleted ~/.gnupg/pubring.gpg and now I'm not able to see
> any output from `gpg --list-keys' and `gpg --list-secret-keys'.
>
> Is it possible to still use my private key to decrypt previously encrypted
On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 10:01 +0200, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 25/05/2020 09:47, Michał Górny wrote:
> > ...and that's really a good thing they can do that instead of choosing
> > a more painful way of getting your fingerprints.
>
> How is that an advantage compared to passphrases? As soon as
On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 09:36 +0200, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 24/05/2020 21:39, Mark wrote:
> > I know there are other options maybe even some that use
> > biometrics to decrypt the database.
>
> I am very wary of biometrics for authentication purposes. There are so
> many examples where the
On Fri, 2020-05-15 at 16:52 -0700, Mark wrote:
> I know this may be a subjective question but what is the best keyserver
> to use? I use GPG4Win with the Enigmail plugin for Thunderbird. The
> keyservers listed in Enigmail are:
>
> vks://keys.openpgp.org, hkps://hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net,
>
W dniu pon, 11.05.2020 o godzinie 17∶22 -0700, użytkownik Mark napisał:
> Kinda of a stupid question here about updating your keys. I'm curious
> as
> to what changes would require you to re-upload it to a keyserver.
>
> I assume updating the passphrase would not because that is tied to
> the
On Sat, 2020-03-21 at 23:39 +, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
> It would appear that the python2/3 migration dumpster fire has claimed
> yet another good package[1]:
>
> ```
> > Hi,
> > Has there been further development? Otherwise I'd suggest to remove
> monkeysign
> > for now, it's blocking the
On Wed, 2020-02-26 at 13:34 -0500, vedaal via Gnupg-users wrote:
>
> On 2/26/2020 at 11:27 AM, "Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users"
> wrote:
>
> > I like to make a proposal for future versions of GnuPG,
> > where a user can change the line witdh of ASCII armor
> > output.
>
> =
>
> It would
Hi,
Gentoo recently started signing UIDs on the keys of our developers.
As part of the system, we revoke signatures of developers who resign.
However, some eventually return and if they return with the same key,
we have a problem.
When I try to sign the key (again), I get the following error:
Hello,
We received a report from one of our users who was unable to get GnuPG
to fetch keys from behind a HTTP proxy [1]. From our investigation, it
seems that GnuPG does not even try to use the proxy if the system does
not have a DNS server configured. In particular, the log posted at [2]
On Fri, 2019-10-18 at 09:19 +0200, Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>
> > 1. How should we handle the SKS keyserver attacks?
>
> I would list in the FAQ the kind of attacks possible,
> to educate users, before they choose one for uploading
> their key.
>
> > One
On Thu, 2019-10-17 at 15:18 -0400, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> 1. How should we handle the SKS keyserver attacks?
>
> One school of thought says "SKS is tremendously diminished as a
> resource, because using it can wedge older GnuPG installations and we
> can't make people upgrade. We should
On Wed, 2019-10-16 at 13:02 +0200, Daniel Bossert wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is anybody using pgp on Android? I did some years ago, would like to, but am
> afraid of security reason.
>
> I have safed my keys on my laptop only.
>
> How are you handling it in ages of mobiles?
>
Get yourself a hardware
On Sun, 2019-07-07 at 07:22 +0700, Konstantin Boyandin via Gnupg-users
wrote:
> I believe this subject is way off the mailing list, but just my 5 cents.
>
> 1. GDPR, as any other bloated, convoluted, written in inhuman juridical
> language law, mostly benefits two kinds of people: lawyers and
>
On Wed, 2019-07-03 at 03:01 -0700, Mirimir via Gnupg-users wrote:
> On 07/02/2019 11:42 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Then, they may decide to start mass poisoning other keys just to
> > prove this is not the right solution.
>
> If what I propose is workable, attackers can poison as many keys as
Dnia July 3, 2019 6:23:37 AM UTC, Mirimir via Gnupg-users
napisał(a):
>On 07/02/2019 08:28 PM, Konstantin Boyandin via Gnupg-users wrote:
>> Hello All,
>>
>> After having read the recent multitude of messages related to SKS
>> keyservers related issue, I figured out that
>>
>> a. The entire
On Fri, 2019-06-14 at 10:12 +0200, Oscar Carlsson via Gnupg-users wrote:
> I'm generally curious on your opinions on the latest new keyserver, this
> time running a new software than the normal keyservers.
>
> They seem to have a different model which minimize the amount of
> information
On Tue, 2019-06-25 at 16:30 +0200, Vincent Breitmoser via Gnupg-users
wrote:
> > Hi @ll.
>
> Hi Dirk,
>
> thanks for your thoughts!
>
> > I don't think it's such a good idea to drop Signatures on keys.
>
> As mentioned in our FAQ, the reason we don't support those is that with the
> SKS
>
On Mon, 2019-07-01 at 15:38 +0100, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
> On 2019/07/01 15:13, Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote:
> > I agree with Professor Green. Maybe he and his students can
> > program a POC something more simple, preferably in Golang and
> > while using the NaCl* library.
>
> Golang?
On Mon, 2019-07-01 at 12:18 +0200, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> Am Montag 01 Juli 2019 01:36:41 schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
> > Now we've got Autocrypt, WKD, and Hagrid: of these Autocrypt is probably the
> > most mature and the easiest for email users.
>
> The problem with autocrypt are the cases
23 matches
Mail list logo
