on secure hardware and OS (could be that your safe text
editor is a cherry on a rotting cake ;) ).
(...)
--
Regards,
Milo
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
--
Regards,
Milo
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Peter.
On 09/09/2012 08:39 PM, Peter Lebbing wrote:
On 09/09/12 13:12, Milo wrote:
Also there are vim scrips allowing some level of integration with gnupg.
Personally, I'd have more faith in a text editor that was written ground-up
with
security in mind. If you take a full-fledged editor
Hi!
On 09/09/2012 09:16 PM, Peter Lebbing wrote:
On 09/09/12 21:06, Milo wrote:
I'm not sure what you are trying to say/prove by polemics with things I
didn't wrote. I won't speculate about your faith in editors, your threat
model, and probably there is no real point for you to speculate
4.6.3-1ubuntu5+5ubuntu1
mingw-w64 2.0.1-1
mingw-w64-dev 2.0.1-1
mingw-w64-tools 2.0.1-1
mingw32-runtime 3.15.2-0ubuntu1
(...)
--
Regards,
Milo
On 05/05/2012 01:57 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
On 05/04/2012 04:35 PM, Milo wrote:
Yes - niche, proof-of-concept, poorly analyzed ciphers. Let's talk
about those widely used and considered mainstream. Those are our
biggest concern.
McEliece is almost as old as RSA. Generations of graduate
On 05/05/2012 10:13 AM, Faramir wrote:
El 04-05-2012 10:17, Milo escribió:
Hello Robert, Hello all.
...
How many petabytes are sent across the wire each day? Do you
really think people will be storing all of today's traffic for
twenty years, just so some analyst not even born yet
On 05/05/2012 12:08 PM, Peter Lebbing wrote:
On 04/05/12 22:35, Milo wrote:
You can't tell consumer or end-user that he can't use 256-bit, symmetric
cipher for his (even!) porn stash because this is some kind of faux pas
and he is iconoclast because of this. It's up to him.
Why should
On 05/05/2012 01:09 PM, Peter Lebbing wrote:
On 05/05/12 12:49, Milo wrote:
1) You are responding to citation regarding symmetric crypto with
widely used key length.
(...)
One more time - this is not up to you or software authors to
decide what's the value behind encrypted data. Even
On 05/05/2012 02:20 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
On 5/5/12 4:37 AM, Milo wrote:
This is futile. I'm reminding you that you are giving one example of
rarely used algo (so _niche_ and _out_of_mainsteam_) to back your
statement that there is good amount of them.
Rarely used is not the same
On 05/05/2012 03:13 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
On 5/5/12 8:57 AM, Milo wrote:
Derivatives of Shor's algorithm are widely conjectured to be effective
against all mainstream public-key algorithms including RSA,
Diffie-Hellman and elliptic curve cryptography. I'm not considering all
of them. I
On 05/05/2012 04:26 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
On 5/5/12 10:17 AM, Milo wrote:
(...) This improves the strength of the algorithm when using keying
option 2, and _provides_ _backward_compatibility_ with DES with keying
option 3.
One-key 3DES *is* DES.
Obviously it's not. It's for example
On 05/05/2012 04:17 PM, Milo wrote:
(...)
You are mixing two topics:
Need of security margin better then provided by one of common, widely
used asymmetric algorithms using 4k key
I was rather thinking about 4k RSA key or security equivalent provided
by one of common, widely used
that key exchange is already completed before
authentication with RSA starts.
Hm, shouldn't authentication happen before exchanging key for
symmetric part of encryption during the SSH session?
Peter.
--
Regards,
Milo
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg
and is simply _average_ smartphone)
--
Kind regards,
Milo
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On 05/04/2012 05:13 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
On 05/04/2012 10:17 AM, Milo wrote:
Well, many expect rise of the quantum computing during lives of most
of us. This can trash most (if not all) asymmetric algorithms
(Shor's algorithm)
No. It can trash *some* asymmetric algorithms
/diginotar-damage-disclosure
http://www.links.org/?p=1196
... And many, many more examples. There were discussions about x509 and
CA's credibility or ability to perform their tasks. Not much to add here
I think.
--
Regards,
Milo
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
discussing alternatives and
- more or less - advertising proprietary software on GPL-powered
project's mailing list.
--
Regards,
Milo
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
extreme form of relativism is better to not
anwser at all.
I think that informative and didactic value of such response is negligible.
--
Kind regards,
Milo
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg
of
libcs or
doing workarounds). So beign probaly the easiest way it's not easy way at all.
Some project are
distributing userland piece of code with kernel module - perhaps this is the
way to
introduce your idea?
--
Regards,
Milo
___
Gnupg-users mailing
20 matches
Mail list logo
