>>> "MA" == Matthias Apitz writes:
> El día viernes, septiembre 02, 2022 a las 10:33:13a. m. +0200, Uwe Brauer via
> Gnupg-users escribió:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Sorry for this elementary question, but I can't find an answer googling.
>>
>&g
Hi
Sorry for this elementary question, but I can't find an answer googling.
Is it possible to have a password that contains UTF8 chars, like Arabic,
Hebrew, Chinese or some IPA symbols??? That concerns also gpgsm
Regards
Uwe Brauer
--
I strongly condemn Putin's war of aggression against
>>> "JC" == Juergen Christoffel writes:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 05:45:53PM +0200, Uwe Brauer via Gnupg-users wrote:
>> 1. just for the first very rough analysis what is a convenient command to
>> get a list of files that have high entropy?
> The fi
s 3.999888140 (error 27.32 percent)
| candidate |
So I am not sure what is the best line, but the question boils down to this,
anybody know enough sed or awk or whatsoever to
tell me how ot filter the ent output?
thanks
Uwe Brauer
--
I strongly condemn Putin's
entropy). However I should then study the distribution of each
letter to be sure.
So is there any other way to run find and some other script to find
suspicious files? Google is not really helpful
Regards
Uwe Brauer
--
I strongly condemn Putin's war of aggression against the Ukraine.
I
>>> "UBvG" == Uwe Brauer via Gnupg-users writes:
> Hi
> I am on Ubuntu 16.04 running
> gpgsm (GnuPG) 2.1.11
> libgcrypt 1.6.5
> libksba 1.3.3-unknown
> I am also a die hard user of emacs and use it for encrypting and
> decrypting my mails.
>
ave old certificates of
this user.
Any help would be strongly appreciated.
Regards
Uwe Brauer
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
as method of last resort?)
Regards
Uwe Brauer
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
>>> "BM" == Brian Minton writes:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 09:40:25AM +0200, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
>> If you trust a set of root certificates, like the ones shipped with your
>> operating system or a different application, you could just import them all
>> and mark them trusted. Of course you
led (Ubuntu 16.06)
and run
gpgconf --launch dirmngr
However the root certificate is still not found. Thunderbird provides
this certificate so I could install it manually.
However I would prefer an automated solution.
Any hints?
Thanks and regards
Uwe Brauer
smime.p7s
Description: S/M
led (Ubuntu 16.06)
and run
gpgconf --launch dirmngr
However the root certificate is still not found. Thunderbird provides
this certificate so I could install it manually.
However I would prefer an automated solution.
Any hints?
Thanks and regards
Uwe Bra
>>> "MHWvG" == Mark H Wood via Gnupg-users writes:
> On Sun, Dec 08, 2019 at 10:38:43AM +0100, Uwe Brauer via Gnupg-users wrote:
>> Now to the question s/mime versus gnupg.
>>
>> There are the following points which make s/mime easier.
&g
>>> "JBvG" == Juergen Bruckner via Gnupg-users writes:
Hell Juergen
> Hello Uwe,
> i use Gmail for business for a very long time and never had any issue
> like that.
You are not going to belive that. I deactivated the s/mime support of
gmail's webinterface and even deleted the certificate.
> Uwe Brauer via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Sorry, I can't help you but I do have a question, if you don't mind ...
> Why are the Students at the University don't use OpenPGP with Gmail
> via the free Mailvelope add-on for Firefox, Chrome? Wouldn't that be
> not
>>> "UBvG" == Uwe Brauer via Gnupg-users writes:
>>> "UBvG" == Uwe Brauer via Gnupg-users writes:
>> Hi
>> It seems to me a complete security breach.
> I repeated the test with other gmail accounts, with emacs or
> th
>>> "UBvG" == Uwe Brauer via Gnupg-users writes:
> Hi
> It seems to me a complete security breach.
I repeated the test with other gmail accounts, with emacs or
thunderbird, always I receive messages which are on signed but not
encrypted although I did enable
signed.
Can somebody please confirm this strange behavior?
Is this connected to the fact that my university enabled smime support?
It seems to me a complete security breach.
Regards
Uwe Brauer
Footnotes:
[1] purely encrypted messages are rejected by the server
> MFPA via Gnupg-users wrote in <1171562612.20191022004056@my_localhost_AR>:
> |On Sunday 20 October 2019 at 3:20:41 PM, in
> |, Uwe Brauer via Gnupg-users wrote:-
> |
> |> I just found that
> |> https://extrassl.actalis.it/portal/uapub/doPro
> Hi
> On Sunday 20 October 2019 at 3:20:41 PM, in
> , Uwe Brauer via Gnupg-users wrote:-
> [...]
> I'm no expert but their Certificate Policy reads to me that the
> private key is compromised right from the start. I think usually the
> keys are generated on the subscri
the certificate.
But this time not, I just obtained a pfx file which I could import, but
does somebody know whether there is a security breach, the way this
certificate was generated?
Thanks
Uwe Brauer
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
the certificate.
But this time not, I just obtained a pfx file which I could import, but
does somebody know whether there is a security breach, the way this
certificate was generated?
Thanks
Uwe Brauer
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http
>>> "WT" == Wolfgang Traylor writes:
>> However given a cer file, how can I find out its fingerprint?
> This command will show you the details of the certificates from the website[1]
> you mentioned including its fingerprint:
> openssl x509 -noout -text -fingerprint -inform DER -in
be desperate, what do I miss?
Thanks
Uwe Brauer
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Sent from my iPhone
> On 6. Feb 2019, at 18:03, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
>
> Add the CA certifcate of Sectigo to ~/.gnupg/trustlist.txt
My problem was I did not know where to find that CA certificate!
Pointers are welcome.
Finally I solved it as I described in a different message.
smime.p7s
': Missing issuer certificate
How can I solve that issue?
Thanks
Uwe Brauer
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
list
Thanks
Uwe Brauer
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
---
| If you allow a mail user agent to render HTML for you, you expose
| yourself to various kinds of surveillance and swindles. Now, it seems,
| one of those might be a decryption exploit.
|
| Does the exploit depend on Javascript code that the MUI will execute?
`----
Any comments?
Thanks
Uw
-keys
I obtained
gpgsm: lock not made: link() failed: Operation not permitted
So what is the problem?
Thanks
Uwe Brauer
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Werner == Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org writes:
(setq mml2015-signer 0x65AD077A)
The correct setting is
(setq mml2015-signers (list 0x65AD077A))
Just in case
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing
David == David Shaw ds...@jabberwocky.com writes:
However it seems that the application expects for some reason another a
password during the import process.
Interesting. I wonder why it does that - perhaps it stores the key
unencrypted internally? What happens if you
Daniel == Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net writes:
Hi Uwe--
I just implemented such a feature for gnus in Xemacs, but it seems that
enigmail does not recognise the key! Does anybody know whether other MUA
support this format?
This seems like a question you'd
just tried to compile old 2.62 on kubuntu 10.04 but failed, does
anybody has a suggestion?
thanks
Uwe Brauer
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman
Hello
Finally I decided to generate a new 4096 keypair.
Now gpg --list-keys tells me I have
sec 1024R/93B61FDD 1998-09-17
uid Uwe Brauer o...@mat.ucm.es
uid Uwe Brauer o...@btmpx1.mat.uni-bayreuth.de
uid Uwe Brauer oub.oub@gmail.com
uid
Kristian == Kristian Fiskerstrand
kristian.fiskerstr...@sumptuouscapital.com writes:
http://www.kfwebs.net/articles/article/42/GnuPG-2.0---IDEA-support
#secure method=smime mode=sign
cool, thanks!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
not recognise the key! Does anybody know whether other MUA
support this format?
thanks
Uwe Brauer
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
oub2.asc
Did not really add a passphrase, since I could import oub2.asc as a
different user, without being asked the password.
Any advice is strongly appreciated.
Uwe Brauer
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gnupg-users
David == David Shaw ds...@jabberwocky.com writes:
On Jan 27, 2014, at 3:02 PM, Uwe Brauer o...@mat.ucm.es wrote:
Hello
I just tried out iPGmail a app for the iPhone which supports
pgp. However I want to import my private key and here the trouble
starts. For some reason
and smime keys are secured by a password, but there is no
time delay, which makes a brute force attack possible.
Could a time delay be implemented similar to the one I just mentioned?
regards
Uwe Brauer
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Jens == Jens Lechtenboerger
clou...@informationelle-selbstbestimmung-im-internet.de writes:
(defun my-message-header-setup-hook ()
(let ((group (or gnus-newsgroup-name )))
(when (or (message-fetch-field newsgroups)
(gnus-group-find-parameter group
Jens == Jens Lechtenboerger
clou...@informationelle-selbstbestimmung-im-internet.de writes:
On So, Dez 22 2013, Uwe Brauer wrote:
Jens == Jens Lechtenboerger
P.S. Do you know Mail-Followup-To (MFT)?
Do you find this annoying?
MFT has benefits: If I reply to a message
Jens == Jens Lechtenboerger
clou...@informationelle-selbstbestimmung-im-internet.de writes:
On Sa, Dez 21 2013, Uwe Brauer wrote:
I am on Kubuntu 10.04 and I have both gnupg and gnupg2
installed. Now since 2.x is not affected by the problem mentioned
I prefer to use
K == K Raven m...@kairaven.de writes:
Hi,
I'm using Kubuntu (13.10) too and because many packets depend on gnupg,
i use the Alternatives system to leave gnupg1 installed and use gnupg2
in parallel. You can see that on
http://wiki.kairaven.de/open/krypto/gpg/p/gpg4#linux (in
mentioned I prefer to use
it. However how can I be sure that gnupg2 is used for my email
correspondence for which I use pgp-mime and not gnupg? (I am using
Xemacs+gnus)
thanks
Uwe Brauer
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gnupg
to this list ;-).
Since you are mentioned in this webpage, do you know by any chance
whether gpgsm is vulnerable in a similar way?
Uwe Brauer
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http
.
thanks
Uwe Brauer
gpgsm --no-tty --status-fd 1 --yes --output /tmp/oub/epg-outputR_HIIF
--detach-sign -u F69E1EFB6147C786
gpgsm: note: non-critical certificate policy not allowed
gpgsm: note: non-critical certificate policy not allowed
gpgsm: note: non-critical certificate policy not allowed
Jens == Jens Lechtenboerger
clou...@informationelle-selbstbestimmung-im-internet.de writes:
On Mi, Dez 18 2013, Uwe Brauer wrote:
I am using Xemacs, gnus the epa pkg for encrypting s/mime using gpgsm.
Hi Uwe,
if I understand you correctly, you fail to encrypt to your
MFPA == MFPA expires2...@ymail.com writes:
Hi
On Thursday 7 November 2013 at 11:16:36 AM, in
mid:87txfotqaz@gilgamesch.quim.ucm.es, Uwe Brauer wrote:
I had to search for and import some more root certificates from the
Comodo website before I could encrypt to you using
MFPA == MFPA expires2...@ymail.com writes:
Hi
Hi
On Monday 4 November 2013 at 10:43:43 PM, in
mid:87habrrdnk@mat.ucm.es, Uwe Brauer wrote:
- from my own experience I am convinced that smime
is much easierthan gpg[2] for reasons I am not
going to repeat here
by such
certificates. [4]
Uwe Brauer
Footnotes:
[1] I must add that I don't share your general view about government
based organisations. I still hope that abuse is the exception not
the rule..
[2] although pgp seems technically better, since some implementations of
smime allow a relative short
.
That was *precisely* my point, thanks for clarifying it
Uwe Brauer
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
MFPA == MFPA expires2...@ymail.com writes:
Hi
On Sunday 27 October 2013 at 2:46:05 PM, in
mid:8761si4vrm@mat.ucm.es, Uwe Brauer wrote:
Isn't the NSA a government based organisation? Surely
guilt-by-association renders every government based organisation just
to indicate that the old pair gets a new
signature. Is this correct? But what if I apply with a different
browser I applied the last time.
thanks
Uwe Brauer
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg
If you generate a new keypair for the new certificate (which is
probably a good idea) then gpgsm (and presumably any other
certificate-using software) will figure out what private key will be
needed to decrypt a particular message and, so long as you still have
the private key
Then a think gpg would be as easy to use as smime, but till then
Uwe Brauer
Footnotes:
[1] I tried to use gpg on a non jailbroken iPhone and it is honestly a hassle.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gnupg-users
Hello
I use gpgsm, via gnus+Xemacs and I have installed a free certificate
from Comodo. This certificate expires in a couple of weeks and I have to
apply for a new one. However I need the old one to read old messages.
Can gpgsm deal with this situation?
thanks
Uwe Brauer
smime.p7s
and gpgsm will know by the date of the
certificate which certificate to use for which message?
- old for old messages
- the new for the new messages
thanks
Uwe Brauer
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing
Daniel == Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net writes:
On 01/08/2013 05:02 PM, Uwe Brauer wrote:
Are there any plans to modify the signature (backward compatible?) such
that it contains the public key embedded as in smime?
Not that i know of. Why do you think this would
Hello
Are there any plans to modify the signature (backward compatible?) such
that it contains the public key embedded as in smime?
thanks
Uwe Brauer
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users
author referred to the gpgsm manual or the mailing list, however
I can't find a relevant description
Can somebody help me?
Thanks very much in advance
Uwe Brauer
Footnotes:
[1] I used gpg, but most of the people I correspondence considered it
as to user unfriendly
sks.keyserver.penguin.de.
Is this possible, or would the same key in different flavours cause
problems and confusions?
Thanks
Uwe Brauer
pgpDX2lRrABVI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman
David == David Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 05:21:13PM +, Uwe Brauer wrote:
David == David Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 04:18:00PM +, Uwe Brauer
David wrote: There is only one version of the key
behaviour.
Thanks
Uwe Brauer
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
62 matches
Mail list logo