Hi,
I need to send personal infos to a recipient who has no idea what
encryption is nor is able to decrypt an encrypted e-mail.
I do not want to use Gmail to send that kind of informations and I'm
comtemplating using posteo.de.
Is this any better?
In other words, how do you use e-mails with
On 8/27/23 08:42, isp_stream via Gnupg-users wrote:
I do not get the point of this thread, please stop.
--
John Doe
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Sorry for hijacking the thread but without the context I'm not sure that
my question would have been understandable.
On 8/7/2022 7:59 PM, Andrew Gallagher via Gnupg-users wrote:
On 7 Aug 2022, at 17:28, Jay Sulzberger via Gnupg-users
wrote:
Andrew, do the sks keyservers work today?
I was
On 6/11/2022 4:24 PM, Linus Virtanen via Gnupg-users wrote:
hii try to verify GPG signature of mutiple applications on windows but i
failed.a friend of mine tried and failed. He said that you do not need
verify GPG signature.He says it is waste of time. is it really necessary
to verify GPG
On 2/22/2022 5:28 PM, Fourhundred Thecat via Gnupg-users wrote:
Hello,
when I type a gpg command in the terminal, such as:
gpg -c foo
the GUI pinentry dialog pops up to ask for password (I guess its
pinentry-gtk-2)
How can I confugure so that the ncurses (text based) dialog is used
On 1/4/2022 4:17 AM, Rayapati Rama Rao (NCS) wrote:
Hi Team,
Good Morning!
Could you please let me know which gnupg software to download for Linux machine to
make use of gpg encryption & decryption.
Also, may I know if any packages required to install on Linux prior to gnupg
installation.
If
On 10/8/2021 9:01 AM, luc.dedroog--- via Gnupg-users wrote:
Hi,
I have an issue with gnupg because I would like to run it in batch (to allow
several users to maintain the keys) but I never succeed to use the parameter
'--command-fd n' or '--command-file file' as explain in the documentation
On 8/4/2021 10:35 AM, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 11:19, Vincent Breitmoser said:
Unlike the other keyservers, keys.openpgp.org has a [privacy policy] that
doesn't permit distributing email addresses without consent. The key
It is not a privacy policy but a serious
On 8/2/2021 11:02 PM, Yuri Kanivetsky via Gnupg-users wrote:
Hi,
```
$ gpg --delete-keys --yes 7D2BAF1CF37B13E2069D6956105BD0E739499BDB
gpg (GnuPG) 2.2.29; Copyright (C) 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY,
On 7/15/2021 12:51 AM, Стефан Васильев via Gnupg-users wrote:
Brandon Anderson wrote:
Andrew Gallagher wrote:
On 14 Jul 2021, at 18:34, Стефан Васильев via Gnupg-users
wrote:
Viktor wrote:
Is 'Стефан Васильев ' the same person that was
ban from this very list a fiew month back?
It looks
On 7/15/2021 12:24 PM, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
On Donnerstag, 15. Juli 2021 03:22:47 CEST Brandon Anderson via Gnupg-users
wrote:
I have several Yubikeys and smartcards in my setup, each with its own
signing subkeys, and I use these, among other things, to sign email
messages. Whenever I want to
On 6/23/2021 3:31 PM, Terry Pierce wrote:
Hi,
Let me start off with I am totally new to GPG/Kleopatra. We use different
encryption tools here and one of our clients uses GPG. I have already
automated the processing of files using our tool and now have a need to build
in a call to handle
On 4/8/2021 5:19 PM, Robert J. Hansen via Gnupg-users wrote:
If anyone in the community has strong feelings about the FAQ -- what
should go in, what should be left out, etc. -- now's the time.
The only thing that I can say is that I would rather see a FAQ that
reflect the current
On 3/25/2021 12:34 PM, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
Hi,
Am Do den 25. Mär 2021 um 11:51 schrieb Bernhard Reiter:
To me the protected headers implementation Thunderbird is a step back,
as it leads to unnecessary data leaks (subject and cc) to other clients
with are OpenPGP/MIME compatible.
Well, there
On 3/18/2021 2:39 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
https://www.gentoo.org/glep/glep-0063.html
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Infrastructure/Generating_GLEP_63_based_OpenPGP_keys
Reading the URLs given by the OP, I see that the GPG FAQ (1) talks about
a default of '2048' but in the latest
On 3/18/2021 10:21 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Hi David,
when Gentoo switched to requiring gpg-signed git commits and pushes, we put
some thought into requirements and best practices. Minus the Gentoo-specific
parts, this is probably good reading:
https://www.gentoo.org/glep/glep-0063.html
On 11/29/2020 12:53 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
On Sat, 28 Nov 2020 07:57, john doe said:
If I look at Debian (1) for example, the checksum file is gpg signed.
Assuming that I understand correctly, the Debian approach is not a safe
way to make the checksums available?propagate?
No, that is a safe
On 11/26/2020 9:10 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
Hi,
and thanks for asking.
Thanks for this.
To be sure that I understand you correctly, I took the liberty of
rewording your answers.
On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 19:12, john doe said:
Is there a URL to download those sha1sums and those public keyss as
Hello all,
I see that at (1) and (2) the public keys block and the sha1sums
respectively are listed on their corresponding page.
Is there a URL to download those sha1sums and those public keyss as files?
That is for checksumming I could simply do:
$ wget
$ sha1sum -c --ignore-missing
and
On 11/7/2020 6:55 PM, pavel hora via Gnupg-users wrote:
Hi,
I would like to use GPG to verify installation files (True Crypt this time to be
specific) that come with a signature .sig and PGP public key .asc.
You should use veracrypt instead.
I have installed GPG 4 Win 3.1.13.
I have imported
20 matches
Mail list logo
